Skip to comments.Who is Judge Michael Malihi?
Posted on 02/07/2012 7:15:53 PM PST by Windflier
Immediately after hearing that Georgia Judge Michael Malihi ruled against the Plaintiffs in the case regarding Obamas eligibility to be on the 2012 presidential ballot, and hearing that Malihi was a Muslim Iranian, I decided to find out all I could about him. Is his ancestry really Iranian? Is his faith really Muslim? And did either of these things, if true, play a role in his decision to side with Obama in the Georgia eligibility hearing?
I set out to find all the details I could. What I found was precious little.
Judge Michael MalihiJudge Malihi is the Deputy Chief Judge for the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings. He was appointed Judge in 1995. If you go to the official website for his office, what you dont find may be more interesting than what you do find. On the OSAH website there is a page which lists bios for all the judges, including Malihi. I clicked on Malihi and all that was listed for him was this:
Thats it! If you click on the links for all the other judges listed, you will find a brief bio telling of where the particular judge was born, where they went to school, etc. But for Malihi? Nada! Zip! Niente! Bupkis! Nothing!
I decided to look at other websites for other state or federal judges to see if its common practice to have absolutely no information listed in their bios.
The Federal Judiciary Center has a massive list.
The directory includes the biographies of presidentially-appointed judges who have served since 1789 on the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, the Supreme Court of the United States, the former U.S. Circuit Courts, and the federal judiciarys courts of special jurisdiction.
I examined a sampling of about 50 judges listed on this site and they all had bios which contained at least when and where they were born, when they died if applicable, where they went to school, where they practiced their career path.
At the official Supreme Court site, bios of all judges were listed.
I looked up judges in various states, in a variety of different roles and guess what? Out of the approximately 15 different sites I visited for different states, bios were present for all judges! I looked up Circuit Court judges, Appellate judges, Superior Court judges, and more. They ALL had bios listed.
Nothing on Judge Michael Malihi.
Isnt that interesting? So I ran searches on several search engines on his name. Was I able to find out much more?
On Google, all I found was essentially what has already been posted on this blog, and others regarding his recent ruling in favor of Obama and his eligibility to be on the 2012 Presidential ballot in GA.
I am not new here. I was a Common Sense Suspicious Birther until April of this year, and even worked with another freeper to produce the youtube video, "Show Me The BirthFAX."
But I have NEVER bought into this two citizen parent lunacy. It is simply NOT the law. I have my own Think Tank, and since last summer, most of my Internet Articles are ones debunking the two citizen parent stuff. (Prior to that it was mostly about discussing Obama's refusal to cough up his long form.)
Here is a good article of mine to work you through your difficulties. This particular Internet Article really irritated Mario Apuzzo, Esq. Tee Hee! Tee Hee!:
We're already living in "interesting times". Simply accessing the data you speak of, as overtly as you suggest, could put someone at the top of a whole bunch of lists.
Your idea has great merit, but none of this is easy.
With that in mind, consider that in the decades beginning in 1960 and extending through 2003, the United States took in almost 22 million immigrants, over 81 percent of whom were from dual-citizenship countries. Of immigrants from the top-20 sending countries to the United States in the years 1994-2002, an average of over 90 percent were dual-citizen immigrants. Of the estimated 8-10 million illegal immigrants in the country in 2002, 85 percent were from dual-citizenship countries. Their children too, become dual citizens.
Being dual citizens causes conflicts with allegiance, patriotism, voting, and longevity. It is very much like sovereign polygamy.
Gonna waste some more time on you:
Shove it, Squeeky. You're the one with difficulties.
I spent some time in the last hour looking through your posting history. What stands out prominently to me, is that you're an arrogant and disrespectful person.
You spent nearly the whole of November 13th, 2011 arguing with two of this community's most long-tenured and well-respected members. What grabbed me, was your sniveling, dismissive tone. I've rarely seen a newbie be so insulting to regulars on this forum.
I'm actually surprised that you didn't get the boot for that behavior. The fact that you didn't, speaks volumes about the quality of character of the ladies you spent hours belittling. Either one of them could have pulled rank on you, and at least had your posts pulled, or had you put on probation.
As far as your arguments tonight, they're patently weak, and are the minority view about the constitutional meaning of NBC. I'd roll up my sleeves and debate the issue with you, but I've tired of doing that over and over again with you arrogant newcomers. We Freepers have been through this subject a million times. Maybe someone else wants to educate you, but with your juvenile attitude, I doubt it. Most are going to just tell you to get bent.
I don’t see a disagreement.
Yes, naturalized citizens can hold dual citizenship but a natural born American cannot. That is why only NBC’s can run for the Office of US President.
If you’re a citizen, do something. Doing anything is better than just watching America die. Hassle your election officials for fun and games.
“Here is a good article of mine to work you through your difficulties.”
I’ll bet you throw your head up and point your nose to the heavens just like Barry does.
What are your thoughts on the two Documents of Certification submitted by Pelosi and Alice Travis Germond-Sec./DNC prior to the elections of 2008?
If there was no question as to Barry’s eligibility, why the two differing Certificates?
Why the coincidental death of Lt. Quarels Harris?
However, they slip up on several of the attempts. First, Nichols proposed changes where he does not say anything about two citizen parents. He just "got it wrong" is what the producers say to trap the unwary.
Then, there are two or three attempts wherein NATIVE BORN is equated with NATURAL BORN, which is pretty much the same thing a lot of the courts do. Again, no mention of a requirement for two citizen parents.
So, this video is like cotton candy. Looks big, but mostly air. Here is a video I produced with the help of my BFF Fabia Sheen, Esq., a lawyer. I hope you like it:
A Natural Born Citizen cannot. However, a person Born in the United States to one or more parents who are not citizens of the United States can be a dual citizen. It really depends on the sovereign claim of the parents' nations that govern this situation of dual citizenship.
From YOUR site:
“Certificates of Birth, Long Form.
There seems to be a lack???
But Please Admit that you dont like
Obama cause hes Black.”
Jeeze, Squeeky...didn’t you say:
Some of the people here thought I was just a Obot, and did not realize I was a Common Sense Suspicious Birther up until April 27 when Obama finally coughed up his long form.
Good Lord, girl...get your story straight!You’re all over the place!
Good night and good bye—no more attention for you!
“Newbie”? “Pulled Rank”? “Probation”?
Welcome to Free Republic. Play nice.
Pimping your blog again?
after you read the above article, you will then need to decide from whom he inherited his sect of the cult. If the kenyan was his father, his membership came from the Peninsula with the slavers. That’s sunni.
If his father was a controversial African-American radical who converted to sunni islam in April, 1964, he also inherited his membership to that same sect.
And as neither potenial MALE ancestors (I use the word potential because we do not know his parentage) were anywhere in the vicinity of the region now known as Iraq when the split between these two sects of the cult of mohammadanism took place, shiite would appear to be most unlikely.
1603 Rucker Rd
Alpharetta GA 30004-1435
MARK O NDESANDJO
Born Nov 1965
15925 FREEMANVILLE RD
ALPHARETTA, GA 30004
Great thread! thanks
Perhaps, but eventually all the “stealth” people will need to reveal(perhaps in smug arrogance) themselves when the “long game” really begins. I think we’ll find that while enormous damage and bloodshed may occur at the outset, these ‘stealth’ people will have no depth or large numbers to maintain control and that the temporary alliances and groups they’ve used to achieve their initial ends will fall apart and these folks will turn on each other as God turns up the heat!
Peter Boyles Show
Monday, February 06, 2012
February 6, 2012 6am
Dr. Jerome Corsi joins the show to discuss the ruling handed down by Judge Malihi which will allow Obama to appear on the Georgia ballot in November. Peter takes calls in the latter half of the hour.
What Price Freedom?
POST-MALIHI RULING ANALYSIS AND INTERVIEW WITH CARL SWENSSON
One of the standard reference books on judges' bios, both federal and state levels, covering the entire country, is The American Bench. You will find it in any good reference library. No administrative law judges would be included. Furthermore, even amongst the true judges, there is a wide range of degree of detail, depending on what information each individual judge wishes to supply.
Malihi might be an Iranian immigrant, but most Iranian immigrants to the US since the overthrow of the Shah and the beginning of the mullah regime (1979) are staunchly anti-Islamist.
Well, if you really want to talk about arrogance, I suggest you take a look in the mirror. Tell me what you see when there is this person staring back at you who:
1.Pretends to know the law about natural born citizenship.
2. Is a member of a group that makes up imaginary legal requirements (the two citizen parent stuff)
3. But, when they present their arguments in court gets laughed out of every court in which they are made.
4. Then, try to blame it all on the judges when they lose, refusing to consider the possibility that they are just wrong, and their legal theory a steaming pile of nonsense.
5. Gets laughed at and jeered by conservative lawyers such as Ann Coulter and Mark Levin for their absurd beliefs.
6. Yet, continues to blithely lie to other conservatives about the ineligibility of people like Mark Rubio and Bobby Jindal.
7. And, when somebody points out their insanity and bad behavior to them, tries to intimidate them into silence.
Cause you know what??? That is the person staring back at you in the mirror.
Has any research been done on SoS Brian Kemp?
You are correct. It's funny but during the entire '08 campaign, there aren't but two or three posts max (generating few if any further replies) discussing the two citizen parent "requirement" here on this forum until Leo introduced it shortly after the election. Suddenly, "We all learned this in school!" became the rallying cry (and I'm still waiting for someone to cite a civics textbook that uses this interpretation of NBC). Once the absurd and convoluted "Kenyan birth" conspiracy fell apart under the weight of its own preposterousness, Leo comes riding in with his wholly invented "Plan B" and now people are incredulous that nobody is buying it.
Excuse me, but I, Windflier, don't presume anything. I simply posted an article of general interest.
Thanks for your explanation, though. It's a good counterweight to the prevailing sentiment of conspiracy.
Squeeky, you're an ass. Plain and simple.
You're a relative newcomer to this community, yet you seem to have no regard for that fact. People here don't know you. You haven't developed any sort of rapport or reputation with us. A simple mindset of good manners and general civility is required of any newcomer to an established group. We're real people, and I highly suggest that you treat us as such.
If you don't instinctively know all this, then you've got issues with people skills, and probably quickly make enemies wherever you go. You're quickly doing that here.
I don't have any issue at all with your having a diametrically opposed opinion to mine about the NBC subject. None at all. For most conservatives, it's not hard to debate other conservatives in a civil fashion. Even when debates become heated, one needn't sink into verbal abuse and nastiness. In fact, that behavior is a common mark of one who has lost the argument. The fact that you begin your debates with that behavior is telling.
In a nutshell, Squeeky, you have an opportunity to become part of one of the most important conservative communities in the country, but you won't last long here, if you insist upon being nasty and abusive with everyone you disagree with.
I'm pretty sure someone posted something about him on the thread, or at the source article.
1. Who says YOU are a conservative??? What do we call people who make up laws to suit their beliefs??? Uh, LIBERALS!!! Like LIBERAL activist judges do. This is what YOU are doing with your Imaginary Two Citizen Parent requirement.
2. Politeness??? Yeah, I can do polite. Problem is that the two citizen parent Birthers here can’t. Disagree with them, and they start calling you names. Two citizen parent Birthers can NOT distinguish any boundary between REALITY and PERSONAL OPINION.
All this stuff is very personal to them, so that when you point out their numerous legal boo-boos they personalize it and think someone is out to get them or something. There is a profound mental disconnect for the two citizen parent Birthers so that “what I think the law should be” becomes “what the law is.” This is why two citizen parent Birthers are sooo RABID.
3. Wanna an example of Number 2 above??? Let’s look at YOUR post here. When I mentioned the Ankeny case in post number 41 above, this is what YOU replied in post number 47. Quoting YOU:
“I’ve been a part of the Birther conversations on Free Republic since Obama’s run for office first sparked them. I have spent hundreds of hours following those conversations, and studying countless references elsewhere. I haven’t read the case you refer to, but I must say that I’m surprised that few have mentioned it, until now.”
That paragraph above is what YOU said. Sooo, YOU have never read the Ankeny decision, and yet when the Georgia Judge hands down his decision, based on the reasoning found in Ankeny, what is YOUR reaction??? Is it to go and actually read the Ankeny decision so that you might understand where Malihi is coming from, to decide whether he is right or wrong??? To decide whether or not he is following the law??? Oh H*LL NO!!!
Instead, YOU do a thread called “Who Is Judge Michael Malihi?,” and fill it up with all sorts of insults against him, without ever once even bothering to actually read the relatively short and easy-to-read Ankeny case.
See. This issue isn’t about the LAW for you and your brethern here. It is some kind of weird psychological thing where you pretend the law is what you want it to be, as opposed to what it is. Then, you plop a “CONSERVATIVE” label on yourself, and set out to preach (lie) to other conservatives here how Rubio and Jindal are not eligible, when you haven’t even read the relatively few cases that apply.
Sooo, I think you need to examine your own motives and behavior and if you do, you might come to the conclusion that what I really am isn’t IMPOLITE. I am far, far worse than that. I am PERCEPTIVE.
I say this hoping you will do the right thing and get off this Imaginary Law stuff.
Your research is awesome! Thanks!!!
Less than two years here on FR. Yeah, you’re new here. I don’t take anyone seriously who uses “thingy”, “and everything”, “stuff”, “Tee Hee! Tee Hee!”, and condescension to try to make their point. And by the way, judges hand down bad decisions with case law to back them up all the time. To wit and for example, the infamous 9th District Court of Appeals.
Well, I hate to admit it, but I am just dying of curiosity how somebody decides a judge has made a bad decision when they haven’t bothered to read the case the judge based his decision on.
Was there a seance??? Did the candles all blow out??? Were there voices and did the table jump up and down??? Cause that would be kind of trippy.
Back to the thread.
Check out # 63 , 66 , 67 , 68 .
Then # 71 , 72, 73 .
Skip the annoyances.
[Thanks for the pings.]
Did someone pressure Malihi to write the judgment that he did? Could be, but I would think the people who might have done so had no connection to Iran.
At a guess, I could say that’s why the Harvard Law School group photographs between 1987 and 2003 are missing:
Name: William C Ayers
Birth Date: 26 Aug 1944
Address: POB 78, W Somerville, MA, 02144 (1985)
Ships that pass in the night?
Obama attended Harvard Law School from 1988 to 1991. During his time at Harvard, Obama lived at 365 Broadway in Somerville, according to his parking tickets...
You, Miss Squeeky, are off your ever lovin’ rocker. Call that an ad hominem if you like, but given your behavior here, I’m just stating a fact.
I don’t know what’s going on with you, or what sort of interpersonal relationship issues you have, but one thing is certain — you can’t have a civil conversation to save your life.
I’ve tried very hard to bring you up to speed on where you are, and who you’re talking to, but apparently that’s gone in one ear, and out the other. Again — this is an established community of real people who know each other quite well — many in real life. Some relationships here go back well over a decade, and even many newer members have established themselves as decent, intelligent, and worthy individuals.
Respect here is earned - not given under duress. I’ve earned what respect and friendship I have here. And I have quite a bit, primarily because I understand the simple concepts of courtesy and manners. No one’s asking you to bow and kowtow to anyone. Simply act like an adult, and you’ll probably be alright. Keep up the nasty tongue lashing routine, and your days here will be few.
You need to get it through your head that this isn’t YouTube, or some other open forum where no one cares if you’re a trash mouth. Step out of line here too often, and the owner may bounce you off the forum.
I think the people who might have pressured Malihi have connections that are much further west.
That was very well said; thank you. I haven't got a terribly impressive tenure (to put it mildly) built up yet, but I've known since even before I signed up that the level of decorum and civility expected in this place is an order of magnitude above what I've witnessed by this individual, both on this thread and on previous ones.
Not sure about Sheriff Joe ... his investigation of Obummer were scheduled (originally) to reveal their results in February (this was back in early December).
Now March ...
Don't hold your breath.
I checked its short posting history, and it's full of bitter nastiness toward one and all. Utter rudeness is about the best way to describe that one's attitude.
You can't even begin a discussion with someone who behaves like that.
A few prior cases ...
(no links - EXCERPTS)
State judge rebuffs Anissa Jones’ residency challenge against James Beverly
Macon Examiner (GA) - Thursday, July 14, 2011
On Tuesday, July 12th, a state judge dismissed a residency challenge by House District 139 candidate Anissa Jones who contended that her opponent, James Beverly, doesn’t live in the East Macon district..
Judge Michael Malihi ‘s ruling confirms Beverly’s eligibility to run for House District 139; even though Beverly admitted that he does have two residences.
State judge assigned to Bibb-Monroe County border dispute
Macon Telegraph, The (GA) - Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Author: Mike Stucka, firstname.lastname@example.org
A state judge was assigned Monday to scrutinize a long-standing Bibb-Monroe county border dispute. Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi will hear the case late this month in the Office of State Administrative Hearings. However, his intervention won’t settle the case. Malihi will review the facts and make a recommendation, which would be sent back to Secretary of State Karen Handel. The judge will review the plat, a land survey, Bibb County’s protest to the survey and Monroe County’s response to the protest.
State will review complaint against Clayton school board
Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The (GA) - Friday, July 4, 2008
Author: JOHN HOLLIS, MEGAN MATTEUCCI ; Staff
Gov. Sonny Perdue said Thursday a citizens’ complaint asking him to remove the Clayton County school board has merit and has forwarded the case to a state agency for further review.
Five Clayton County residents filed the complaint with Perdue on June 23, saying the board lacks leadership and is floundering “like a rudderless ship.”
Perdue referred the matter Thursday to the Office of State Administrative Hearings.
“I have reviewed the complaint, and I believe that it raises sufficient, specific allegations that warrant review,” Perdue said in a release.
Administrative Judge Michael Malihi will hear the case at 8 a.m. on July 17, two days after an election for seven board seats.
MARINA DECISION REVERSED - COURT NARROWS INTERPRETATION OF COASTAL MARSHLANDS PROTECTION ACT
Savannah Morning News (GA) - Friday, July 13, 2007
Author: MARY LANDERS, 912-652-0337, email@example.com
A much-lauded Georgia law that protects the salt marsh can’t be applied as widely as environmentalists would like, the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday.
The decision is a win for mega-developers, who have long contended the Coastal Marshlands Protection Act applies only to those portions of a project that touch the marsh.
“We are grateful the Court of Appeals has corrected the Administrative Law Judge’s mistakes concerning the permitting of these important amenities for our homeowners,” Atlanta-based Land Resource Company CEO Mike Flaskey said in a written statement.
Land Resource is building Cumberland Harbour, a 1,068-home luxury community in St. Marys. Its application for the state’s largest marina complex - two full-service marinas and three community docks that could accommodate up to 700 boats - sparked a series of legal challenges.
In March 2006, Administrative Law Judge Michael M. Malihi instructed the Coastal Marshlands Protection Committee to consider the impact on the marsh of not only the proposed marina complex, but also the houses and roads in the development.
Can we get a cleanup on aisle three, please?
Manson, Ayers.....slightly different cut....but of the same cloth...
If the MSM wasn't in the administration's pocket, I'd agree, but if they won't print it, it will be a non-event. Fast and Furious comes to mind, with incredibly little coverage in the media.
That was one weird nut-case.
I clicked the posting history link you provided and word-search counted the number of times she referred to her “BFF Fabian Sheen” in her replies.
At least 35.
Maybe there is something to that? Maybe I’ll start deluging my replies with references to my BFF The Old Lady.
Or maybe not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.