Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeal of Obama eligibility decision filed yesterday
Coach is Right ^ | 1/17/2012 | Doug Book

Posted on 02/17/2012 9:22:14 AM PST by Oldpuppymax

The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed an appeal with the Georgia Superior Court in the case of Weldon v Obama, one of the three Georgia lawsuits claiming Barack Hussein Obama to be Constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of the United States or to be included on the Georgia ballot. (1)

It is perhaps significant that the very act of filing the appeal was fought by the Superior Court clerk’s office which claimed that an additional $2 fee had not been included with Liberty Legal’s paperwork for the filing of separate motions.

Additionally, the Court Clerk invented numerous excuses to prevent the filing, moving from one to the next whenever it was pointed out by Liberty Legal attorneys that none reflected normal court operating procedure. According to Liberty Legal attorney Van Irion, the clerk’s conduct was, in the course of his entire legal experience, “unheard of.” (2)

As a side note, although the paperwork had been provided some 7 days earlier, the clerk’s office failed to inform Liberty that there was a problem. The clerk simply “sat on the petition” and the filing deadline of TODAY would have been missed had Irion not called to make certain the filing had taken place!

The appeal itself is based upon the claim that the “rights of the appellant [had] been prejudiced because the finding of the Secretary of State (was) affected by…error of law.” (1)

That is, Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who approved Judge Michael Malihi’s Administrative Court decision, had done so in spite of (or due to) mistakes of law made by the Judge in deciding the case.

As Irion states in the appeal, the decision of the Judge “not only violates…

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: barackobama; certifigate; eligiblitydecision; libertylegal; michaelmalihi; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-317 next last
To: Harlan1196; All

My Senator, Jerry Moran, thinks that simple, majority vote legislation can fix the anchor-baby problem.

“— subject to the jurisdiction thereof” -—

If an illegal immigrant couple crosses our border, from Mexico, and then they decide to split up, after having a child in the United States -—

What American Court will decide custody of that child?

Is that child truly subject to full “Jurisdiction” of American law?

I think not.

Congress should define those rules, Congress has every right to define those terms, under the law.


61 posted on 02/17/2012 4:44:02 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196; All

My Senator, Jerry Moran, thinks that simple, majority vote legislation can fix the anchor-baby problem.

“— subject to the jurisdiction thereof” -—

If an illegal immigrant couple crosses our border, from Mexico, and then they decide to split up, after having a child in the United States -—

What American Court will decide custody of that child?

Is that child truly subject to full “Jurisdiction” of American law?

I think not.

Congress should define those rules, Congress has every right to define those terms, under the law.


62 posted on 02/17/2012 4:44:07 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Answer these questions, please:

1. Did anyone prove Obama’s eligibility in the Irion case? If so, what probative evidence of eligibility was entered into the record?

2. Did anyone prove Obama’s eligibility in the Hatfiled case? If so, what probative evidence of eligibility was entered into the record?

3. Did anyone prove Obama’s eligibility in the Taitz case? If so, what probative evidence of eligibility was entered into the record?

4. If any of these attorneys had entered into the record the online Kenyan birth certificate and it remained uncontested by Obama since he and his attorney both showed contempt for the court and didn’t even show up, would Malihi have HAD to accept it as probative? Why or why not?

5. Why did Malihi ignore both Hatfield’s motion to have the burden of proof determined, and all the attorneys’ motions to have Malihi certify the record so that a different judge could decide whether Obama and his lawyer were guilty of contempt of court? If Malihi was negligent on those things, why should we trust that he acted in good faith in ANY of his dealings?

Let’s skip the childish taunts and just get down to the facts of this case. I’ve cited the statutes, rules of evidence, etc, and the only argument your “side” seems to come up with is, “You’re stupid.” Really, really childish way of side-stepping the substantial issues.

And after having looked at your profile, I hope you realize that being part of the Republican establishment doesn’t give you a lot of street cred on this issue at all. The R establishment has trampled the Constitution in so many ways it’s not even funny. Politicians are bought and sold just like slaves used to be bought and sold. You may consider it a real winning point that the politicians and judges have mocked and/or ignored this issue, but for those of us who are aware of all the fraud and how complicit our supposed “public servants” are in all the fraud, that fact is just proof that our government needs a good housecleaning.


63 posted on 02/17/2012 4:54:44 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
George Will and Ann Coulter BOTH think that the Birther arguments are silly.

You do realize this fact, don't you?

64 posted on 02/17/2012 4:57:21 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
George Will and Ann Coulter BOTH think that the Birther arguments are silly.

You do realize this fact, don't you?

65 posted on 02/17/2012 4:57:25 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I can't stand Obama.

However, I won't stand by and let stupidity go unchallenged.

The Birthers have NO CASE and are represented by legal morons.

66 posted on 02/17/2012 4:59:44 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I can't stand Obama.

However, I won't stand by and let stupidity go unchallenged.

The Birthers have NO CASE and are represented by legal morons.

67 posted on 02/17/2012 4:59:44 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
Actually, I LIKE most of your questions and I really do wish that someone would ask Obama these things.

However, the questions that would hurt Obama the most, politically, will NEVER be asked because the other Birther stuff, like this NBC stuff, is drowning out the more important questions about Obama’s past.

68 posted on 02/17/2012 5:04:33 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

America is a common law country - the only thing that matters is the case law.

Lets talk about American law.


69 posted on 02/17/2012 6:13:44 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Your analogy of my question is silly.

There is a distinct difference between electability and eligibility.

My question was solely focused on eligibility.

Any offspring of any ( name your sycopath ) US citizen and another US citizen , born in the US, is a Natural Born Citizen by birth and can rightly so qualify to run for President of the United States. ( If all other criteria is met per the US Constitution).

Whether or not if they can get elected to the office is a completely different matter.....


70 posted on 02/17/2012 6:14:03 PM PST by Bud Krieger (Another President , another idiot......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

America is a common law country. Case law and precedent is what matters. WKA is presently the law of the land. It doesn’t matter what you think they got wrong or what they left out. It is the law of the land and its present interpretation is encapsulated in Ankeny.

WKA addresses the first 50 years - that long discussion of the evolution of the common law term from NBS to NBC is addressing the legal framework in which the Founders were familiar with.


71 posted on 02/17/2012 6:18:23 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike; Berlin_Freeper; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; Bikkuri; Plummz; ...


WHO WILL ASK, AND WILL HE ANSWER?

The more discerning voter has reasonable doubt that the last election was legitimate because of a questionably ineligible candidate on the ballot. This suspicion can be alleviated by obtaining the answers to twelve questions which Barry Soetero, aka Barack Obama, has never PERSONALLY answered.

72 posted on 02/17/2012 6:23:35 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Speaking of morons, you sure do stutter a lot!


73 posted on 02/17/2012 6:29:53 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

You mean the “birther stuff” that Mr Failure to Appear is afraid to litigate in court?

“The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.”


74 posted on 02/17/2012 6:31:01 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

ok...so one day, the son of Osama decides to run for office, and being an upstanding, honest sort of guy, he makes no bones about who his father was, or where he was born. He is also quite proud of being a mohammadan, and when he introduces himself, he says Hi! I’m what-his-name Osama and I’m a muslim, and I hope you will vote for me...

And that’s all there is to it really. You wouldn’t suspect him of being a Russian spy, or ask for his birth certificate, would you?

But if he placed an obviously forged abstract of a birth certificate on the Net, and sealed all his records, you might just begin to wonder...who is this man? Is he really an arab?

You see, IMO, the people who vote for the son of Osama have a right to know who he is. But thinking about it, it’s not likely the son of Osama would try it, because even he knows he couldn’t run for President because his parents weren’t born in the US.

So it’s not because his father is terrorist number one that stops him. He would still get votes, if the Democrat Party chose him as their candidate, thinking that maybe this will keep the muslims happy...

(The GOP wouldn’t, is my guess, but I’m an aussie, so what would I know?)


75 posted on 02/17/2012 7:22:58 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

But his mother was an American citizen so your point is irrelevant.


76 posted on 02/17/2012 8:03:59 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

Pardon me (no, I’m not sorry) I want to jump in here and ask you, what proof have you SHE was his mother?

Go on, be honest, the answer is NONE.


77 posted on 02/17/2012 8:35:15 PM PST by Fred Nerks (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

78 posted on 02/17/2012 9:48:26 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

oh my goodness...you don’t suppose she might have been the ‘wife from whom he is separated who lives in the Philippines’...do you?


79 posted on 02/17/2012 10:11:30 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
“In amity” means in friendship with the government. The 14th used the phrase: “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,”. It meant the same thing.
Please explain how you have come to the conclusion that they mean the same thing?

It would be interesting to see a birther try a court case arguing that Obama Sr was either not here in amity...
Why do that when it's so much easier to show that natural born citizenship can't be passed from a transitional alien to their offspring.

...(I believe he was deported or encouraged by the US government to leave) or that he was here temporarily at the bidding of a foreign government...

The man was not here "at the bidding" of any government. Individual people helped him with his tuition and scholarship, not any government. He was given a student visa under @USC 8 which grants student visas to visiting alien students. Any child born to an alien while present in the US on a student visa, no matter who the mother was, would also fall under USC 8, as that Title falls under Congress' Constitutionally granted powers on @establishing uniform rules of naturalization, and under no pretense of the imagination could the progeny of an alien be considered to be a natural born citizen.

Your portrayal of the situation is abysmal, but not unexpected.

80 posted on 02/17/2012 10:36:39 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-317 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson