Skip to comments.Video: Krauthammer On Santorum And Social Issues
Posted on 02/18/2012 3:58:27 AM PST by careyb
From Special Report
For those of us with babies sleeping in our laps, what did he say?
Seriously, how about a clue?
careyb doesn’t respond to people.
Then why does he post to them! :)
I don’t know, I guess he posts his blog here for hits, and then goes on with his life elsewhere.
I turned fox, radio and most internet journal off weeks ago. I haven’t listened to krauthammer during this. I’ll turn back to them...(turned the blow hard Rush off too) when they’re being fair and respectable to Newt.
Santorum is nice and decent guy. He has a nice smile, nice kids... nice clothes...If people in the industry can’t see that he knows probably nothing more and most likely a lot less than most of these tv journalists they’ll out him to the public.
Bottom line, I’m not reading or listening to anyone unless someone reviews it first, like the person who posts it, and then tells me it’s fair and balanced.
I’m sure krauthammer is kissin sanatorum butt the whole show.
I didn’t click the link either, I don’t care what Krauthammer has to say.
So you stole a video and now deserve blog hits?
Piss off, pimp.
WAIT A MINUTE!!! Was Krauthammer telling the truth. Did Santorum really say that sex is for procreation ONLY - and that “pleasure is ok” if within the confines of procreation?
IF he said that - and I stress IF - then he really is the humorless prig prude I thought him to be.
I am simply amazed at how many freepers don’t watch, listen, or analyze anything any longer. And you wear it like a badge of honor when in reality you are simply an ostrich with your head buried in the sand. Good grief, Kraut made some good points.
There seems to be nobody ‘acceptable’ any longer for some except for their own blatherings.
Your intense HATRED of Rick S borders on
Strange your trolling for someone
Which is getting sadly obvious !
Who do you work for ???????????
I simply ask if he said such things? I did not assume he did or did not.
That is a question. I left open the option that Krauthammer was totally off base or at least taking Rick S out of context.
So do you know, has Santorum made statements indicating that sex, even among married couples, is only for procreation? I am asking a question. Period.
I repeat my question: did Rick S say that sex is for procreation only?
Did he say it recently?
Was it taken in, or out, of context?
If he said it, said it recently, and said it in context, how do you think that is going to sell in the General Election?
All innocent questions.
You Santorum haters are acting like children. It’s okay to be FOR someone, but to tear down another Conservative candidate is ridiculous.
First and foremost, Romney needs to be defeated. And however that scenario works out and whichever man can accomplish that goal has my support...and should have yours as well.
Am I a hater for asking a question? I see there are no answers forthcoming.
First and foremost, Obama must be defeated or the nation is gone, period. I don’t think Santorum has a prayer of doing that.
So I repeat the innocent quesitons:
Did Rick S say that?
Did he say it recently?
Did he say it in context?
How will that work in the general election?
Santorum's beliefs are completely in line with Catholic teaching that sexual intercourse has two primary functions: unitive and procreative. It unites the man and woman in their relationship (which includes having fun during the process) while the couple is open to the possibility of conceiving a child. That doesn't mean that you must intend on conceiving a child, only that you are open to it. That's why Natural Family Planning is promoted (works just fine) as no contraception is used.
As far as how his Catholic beliefs will play during the general election, he needs to have a JFK-like moment that his beliefs are his beliefs, and why the "bleep" is everyone obsessed with them when we have an econony teetering on the edge of destruction. If he doesn't do that, he'll be letting the libertine liberal scumbag media define the election.
“then he really is the humorless prig prude I thought him to be?”
I rest my case.
This is why streaks are so important: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2848190/posts?page=24#24
Rick Santorum will never be president for a whole host of reasons. I am not a hater, and I will vote for the man if I have to. Listen, Rick has yet to explain away his 18 point loss in his last Senate re-election bid. Saying it was a bad year for republicans is not enough. Many incumbents won that year, and no setting senator took a loss like he did. There were valid reasons that he would lose and badly, but no that badly. Could it be that the voters were just tired of him? I am. Like I said I am no hater, I just would really like to win. I am not going to vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. And I will vote for Mr. Santorum if pressed, but the man that can win and articulate our message is Newt Gingrich.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.