Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Ballot Challenge Filed in PA A Nomination Petition Objection Was Filed Today...
CDR Kerchner's Blog ^ | February 17, 2012 | Charles Kerchner

Posted on 02/18/2012 12:26:44 PM PST by Seizethecarp

Obama Ballot Challenge Filed in PA – A Nomination Petition Objection Was Filed in Commonwealth Court of PA Against Obama at 10:24 AM 17 Feb 2012

It was a long and busy, but very productive day. I just returned from Harrisburg PA, our state capital, where today we filed in the Commonwealth Court of PA and with the Secretary of State office the ballot access challenge/objection to Obama being on the ballot in PA since Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is thus constitutionally not eligible for the office he seeks. Below is a very brief initial report of what transpired today with a couple pictures. Full video was recorded at the news conference and will be posted as soon as it is available.

PA ATTORNEY KAREN L. KIEFER TODAY FILED A ‘NOMINATION PETITION OBJECTION’ IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PA IN HARRISBURG PA ON BEHALF OF ‘OBJECTORS’ CHARLES KERCHNER AND DALE LAUDENSLAGER CHALLENGING THE BALLOT ACCESS PETITION FOR CANDIDATE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

(Excerpt) Read more at cdrkerchner.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: ballotchallenge; certifigate; kerchner; naturalborncitizen; obama; usurper
Another patriot steps up...again!
1 posted on 02/18/2012 12:27:00 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Ping to Kerchner’s PA ballot challenge filing...


2 posted on 02/18/2012 12:28:46 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

That will go as far as the other challenges. After a while it gets kind of... depressing.

Who knows? Maybe the 976th challenge (or whatever it is) will make it.

Now I will try to stop being GloomyRabbit and return to my ferocious alter ego.


3 posted on 02/18/2012 12:43:15 PM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
There's a new one in Arizona that appears timed with the Arpaio's Posse report, and there's now a US Supreme Court case that questions Obama's eligibility.

It's hard to keep track of them all. Heehee....

4 posted on 02/18/2012 1:19:38 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
They better make sure that Orly doesn't hijack the proceedings. Keep her as far away as ppssible.
5 posted on 02/18/2012 1:31:24 PM PST by Major Matt Mason (The Chicago Way isn't the American Way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

If you believe in freedom, you must support the challengers. It is not good when the Repubs refuse to comment. I think the first one with the guts will win and win big. They will be labeled but the masses have to stand by them. Eventually this has to make the news-SOMEWHERE! Same as the unemployment stats being “cooked”. That is starting to gain some momentum.


6 posted on 02/18/2012 1:40:54 PM PST by DrDude (Governor of the 57th State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

Yes, the first one with the gut will win and win big!
Unfortuntately none has shown any gut. I wrote to ask them to just challenge obama’s lawlessness when he failed to show up at GA court as ordered and they all ignore it!

What kind of president will they be if they dont have the gut to challenge the current ‘president’ for acting above the law?


7 posted on 02/18/2012 1:55:22 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...

8 posted on 02/18/2012 2:21:16 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FerociousRabbit
"That will go as far as the other challenges. After a while it gets kind of... depressing."

Yes, it does get depressing.....but we MUST keep moving forward. We can do it a thousand times; however, one of those times just may stick.

Just because evil may win many a battle DOES NOT mean they have won the war. And this is EXACTLY what this is.....WAR.

Remember how many battles our Founding Fathers lost? Who won the war?

9 posted on 02/18/2012 2:39:51 PM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FerociousRabbit

My tag line says it all. I should include all young Americans, but you get the drift.


10 posted on 02/18/2012 2:48:06 PM PST by GregNH (I will continue to do whatever it takes, my grandchildren are depending on me....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

I guess I should formally request to be put on your ping list, shouldn’t I.


11 posted on 02/18/2012 3:04:29 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

12 posted on 02/18/2012 3:07:14 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrDude
It is not good when the Repubs refuse to comment. I think the first one with the guts will win and win big.

Tell that to Rick Perry.

13 posted on 02/18/2012 3:15:32 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
...CONCERNED CITIZENS OF PA, RESIDENTS OF AND DULY REGISTERED MEMBERS OF THE ELECTORATE...

Not being "up to snuff" on PA's laws and I could be wrong...he may lose if he isn't an actual elector like those in Georgia are.
Any and every loophole will be sought to close this case out.

While I admire the man's efforts he may fall short if he isn't an elector.

ELECTIONS Title 25
§ 1328. Approval of registration applications.

(a) Examination.--Upon receiving a voter registration application, a commissioner, clerk or registrar of a commission shall do all of the following: (1) Initial and date the receipt of the application.
(2) Examine the application to determine all of the following: (i) Whether the application is complete.
(ii) Whether the applicant is a qualified elector.

Perhaps there is more. I'll keep looking.

14 posted on 02/18/2012 3:34:06 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
It's hard to keep track of them all. Heehee....

It's easy to keep track of those that have been successful, because there are none.

15 posted on 02/18/2012 3:42:46 PM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

16 posted on 02/18/2012 3:56:27 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Were all the Georgia plaintiffs electors?
Would it matter which electors they were, democrat or republican?
Finally we now know who has “standing”....


17 posted on 02/18/2012 4:01:34 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Yep, applicable...@TITLE 25 Sec. 701. Definitions.
"Election." A general, municipal, special or primary election.

@TITLE 25 CHAPTER 16 COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW
§ 1602. Court of common pleas.

(a) Standing.--The following have standing to appeal an action of a commission to the appropriate court of common pleas: (1) An applicant whose claim for registration has been denied.
(2) An individual whose registration has been canceled by a commission.
(3) A qualified elector of a municipality whose rights are impaired by any general order made by a commission. (b) Time.--An appeal under subsection (a) must be made by the seventh day preceding an election.
(c) Grounds.--The appeal must request relief and set forth the grounds for relief.
(d) Hearing.--Upon timely receipt of an appeal under this section, the court shall conduct a hearing.
(e) Order.--If the court finds that an injustice has been done, it shall reverse or modify the ruling of the commission and issue appropriate injunctive relief.

At this point I'm going to assume I'm right...he needs to be an elector to have standing.

18 posted on 02/18/2012 4:06:16 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Now I want somebody to prove me wrong 'cause the case is going nowhere as I see it now.
19 posted on 02/18/2012 4:08:42 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone; FerociousRabbit; Seizethecarp; rxsid; LucyT; hoosiermama; Danae; little jeremiah
"That will go as far as the other challenges. After a while it gets kind of... depressing."

Yes, it does get depressing.....but we MUST keep moving forward. We can do it a thousand times; however, one of those times just may stick.

Just because evil may win many a battle DOES NOT mean they have won the war. And this is EXACTLY what this is.....WAR.

Remember how many battles our Founding Fathers lost? Who won the war?

Keep your chin up! Keep your spirits up!

One of these cases WILL come through. (Think not just of war, but of Thomas Edison and his inventions.)

Keep praying.

20 posted on 02/18/2012 4:12:41 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Amen!


21 posted on 02/18/2012 4:16:23 PM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Rick Perry caved on the eligibility issue as soon as the MSM said "boo".

His comment about Americans being heartless on illegal immigration is what sunk his boat.

Good riddance.

22 posted on 02/18/2012 4:26:42 PM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

kind of like you, huh?


23 posted on 02/18/2012 4:32:32 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

FWIW: This is another “Obama Sr makes Jr ineligible” case. It makes no claim that Jr wasn’t born in the USA, so Hawaii birth certificates, etc won’t be an issue. All that matters for this case is the idea that a NBC must have two citizen parents.

Being wrong on the law, it will go down in flames like all the others.

But I think it never hurts to have a state rule on what it thinks NBC means. I personally would prefer states - and I asked my AZ legislators for this and it didn’t go anywhere - require candidates to file a valid birth certificate.

I also would like to see a rule saying any candidate for office waives his/her privacy rights on school records, taxes and past employment - but that REALLY didn’t go anywhere. I don’t think ANY politician will ever support that!


24 posted on 02/18/2012 4:42:30 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Odd, I keep seeing references to sections that I don't seem to be able to find.
@http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/12d0126p.pdf 25 P.S. § 2753(a) and 25 P.S. § 2862 mentioned.
@Title 25 - those sections aren't available. Chapters 20 - 32 of Title 25 simply aren't at the link.
25 posted on 02/18/2012 4:44:33 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Have you heard anything lately about Arpaio’s possee?


26 posted on 02/18/2012 4:50:25 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; All
@CHAPTER 33. CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCTCandidates for elective office who wish to have their names placed on the ballot for the primary election of a major political party must obtain a certain number of signatures of the voters of the party on a nomination petition.
See generally 25 P. S. sections 2862, 2869.

So where does one go to find Title 25, Chapter 28 of the Pennsylvania Statutes?

27 posted on 02/18/2012 4:57:27 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FerociousRabbit

That will go as far as the other challenges. After a while it gets kind of... depressing.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yes, it is depressing. And...Realistically you are likely correct.

BUT....It needs to be done. Why?

Because the names of the cowards and traitors, (those who failed to uphold their oath before God to defend the Constitution,) must be recorded for history. SHAME on them! May future generations spit upon their names.


28 posted on 02/18/2012 5:00:17 PM PST by wintertime (Reforming a government K-12 school is like reforming an abortion center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57
Were all the Georgia plaintiffs electors?

Well, apparently I'm not using "electors" in the same sense in which they do.
I'm still looking for stuff, but here's their @CHAPTER 13 VOTER REGISTRATION §1301. Qualifications to register. §1302. Residence of electors.

A little convoluted IMO.

29 posted on 02/18/2012 5:14:49 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
CDR Kerchner appears to be a “qualified elector” in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania!

http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/LI/CT/HTM/25/00.011..HTM

“Qualified elector.” An applicant who possesses all of the qualifications for voting prescribed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania and the laws of this Commonwealth or who, being otherwise qualified by continued residence in the election district, obtains such qualifications before the next ensuing election. The term does not include a military elector.

30 posted on 02/18/2012 6:22:36 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
"Keep your chin up! Keep your spirits up!

One of these cases WILL come through. (Think not just of war, but of Thomas Edison and his inventions.)

Keep praying. "

Let these scumbags win?? Not on my watch.

Only a matter of time. And given how many loose threads there are in the tapestry of the "Obama" narrative, I'm thinking that the unravelling of the scam will come sooner, rather than later.

31 posted on 02/19/2012 5:51:50 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Philman,

Thanks for the links.

I wonder if the other states’ challenges have been brought by folks that are electors...

If so, then they may have a better chance, based on having that elusive ‘standing’ .


32 posted on 02/20/2012 8:58:37 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; WildHighlander57
Thanks for the links.
My pleasure, WildHighlander57.

CDR Kerchner appears to be a “qualified elector” in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania!
Good! I'm glad somebody else looked at it as well.
If they come back with "he has no standing" everyone will know it's BS.

33 posted on 02/20/2012 9:09:42 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

“I think the first one with the guts will win and win big.”

Were all the rest just gutless?


34 posted on 02/22/2012 11:40:45 AM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson