Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana warns Obama of eligibility 'default'
WND ^ | 2-21-12 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 02/21/2012 11:00:52 PM PST by STARWISE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Ronin

Well our Sec of State here in GA held out for two new nuke plants so I hope Indiana gets something equally good for letting the POS off the hook.


21 posted on 02/22/2012 8:01:21 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I wish another attorney was representing this complaint (bless Orly’s heart).

I hope I’m wrong, but I’m not getting all wee-weed up about the potential peril to any party who fails to attend or participate in this hearing.


22 posted on 02/22/2012 8:23:11 AM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

A default judgement gives the plaintiffs what they want - there is no need to enter any evidence at all.

What happened in Georgia is that the plaintiffs could have had a default judgement but they requested that the case be decided on the merits of their evidence and legal arguments.

The judge found both lacking.

Obama’s team made no arguments or presented no evidence - the plaintiffs failed to prove him ineligible.

Btw - the “have the proceeding dismissed.” is what happens when the plaintiffs fail to show.


23 posted on 02/22/2012 12:18:09 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

I think Obama wants a state to rule against him so they can shift it into Federal Court and fight one battle instead of many.


24 posted on 02/22/2012 12:21:46 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
"Obama’s team made no arguments or presented no evidence - the plaintiffs failed to prove him ineligible."

The burden of proof is with the candidate seeking office.

The candidate seeking office told the judge and the citizens of Georgia to f&%#-off, and never showed up for the hearing.

25 posted on 02/23/2012 5:43:29 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

The administrative hearings have their own rules.

Hatfield knew HE had the burden of proof - he specifically asked that the proof be shifted to Obama. The judge never granted his request.

“On January 19, 2012, Plaintiffs Swensson and Powell filed a “Motion For Determination of Placement of Burden of Proof” in which Plaintiffs sought an order of the Court, pursuant to Haynes v. Wells, 273 Ga. 106, 108-109, 538 S.E. 2d 430, 433 (2000), requiring Defendant Obama to affirmatively establish his eligibility for office. Not only did Judge Malihi not rule on Plaintiffs’ motion in advance of trial, as was requested by Plaintiffs, but the judge never even addressed or resolved the motion in his final ruling.”


26 posted on 02/23/2012 6:42:00 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
WND

The perpetual motion machine of false hope.

27 posted on 02/24/2012 9:48:38 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

you are a real piece of work, dismissal was never considered in Indiana (just like Georgia) despite saying they would

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OreNM9NDxlE


28 posted on 02/24/2012 5:55:07 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

I wasn’t talking about Indiana


29 posted on 02/25/2012 5:07:35 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson