saying they could not authenticate copies - they needed originals.
Posted on 03/03/2012 7:02:42 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
Just a day after Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Apaio presented proof the birth certificate presented by Barack Obama as proof he meets Constitutional eligibility to be president is a fraud, we have a story coming out of Hawaii that may provide problems for Obama.
Jerome Corsi writes:
Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.
“During the course of my employment,” Adams swears in the affidavit (viewable in full as part 1 and part 2), “I became aware that many requests were being made to the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division, the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the Hawaii Department of Health from around the country to obtain a copy of then-Senator Barack Obama’s long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate.”
As he inquired about the birth certificate, he says, his supervisors told him that the records were not on file at the Hawaii Department of Health.
“Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health,” Adams’ affidavit reads, “and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government.”
b
None - birther lawyers are too incompetent to advance a law suit that far.
The CCP said they did not need an original document to show signs of forgery. An electronic pdf was adequate. Do you think that is true?
Do you think that is true?
You need to first establish what you assert is true before someone can agree or disagree.
For the sake of honesty...
The second link is to my post, post 226. However that post contains the whole of the the post being replied to, Harlan1196’s post 223, which is the one I should have linked to.
Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea culpa.
How can the CCP investigation be legitimate if you need an original to detect forgery? No document expert would do what they did so why should we accept their conclusion? Especially with their known bias?
The public was directed to the pdf because they also read the supporting documentation from Hawaii that was posted with it and also read the press reports from Hawaii.
Most people would not then indulge in Clintonesque parsing of words to reach the conclusion that the WH altered the BC that Hawaii sent and posted a forgery.
If the content was changed then how can forgery be suggested if there is no original to compare it to?
If the content was changed then how can forgery be suggested if there is no original to compare it to?
ROFLMAO what did you do in the Navy, logic apparently wasn’t needed in your job.
You would be more persuasive if you omitted the adjectives, e.g. “birther”. The word is partisan, emotional rather than an appeal to reason, and damages your credibility.
This is a quote from the lead investigator about the pdf BC:
“The document is far too problematic to discuss in one press conference. The entire document is fraudulent.”
What do you think they mean by that?
In this case an original paper copy. Go back and actually read their arguments and it will make sense.
Remember what process they are saying could not have happened.
It’s actually from a birther web site so you know it is true.
http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-phoenix/cold-case-posse-reveals-obama-s-documents-are-forgeries
Do you contend that an original is required to make this determination?
What do you think they mean by that?
I think what Zullo said speaks for itself. The pdf file was altered so badly and so often that it couldn't be much more than fraudulent.
Just my opinion and your mileage may vary. (JMO...YMMV)
It could even be worse than that!
Do you believe that "The Great OmniPOTUS" actually posted that pdf file himself or did it pass through the hands of some flunky three or four times before it made its way onto the Internet?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.