How dare The Learning Channel racially profile ‘All-American Muslim’ by taking it off the air. /sarc
Will they replace the show with All-American Marxists?
It’s interesting to remember the liberals reaction to the sponsorship of this show.
Liberals were enraged and outraged (aren’t they always) when Lowe’s pulled out of advertising on All-American Muslim. How dare Lowe’s do that, screamed the liberals. It is racist,bigoted, etc. for a sponsor to decide to pull ads from programming based on concerns about content of a show.
But, in the case of Rush Limbaugh, the liberals are delighted that sponsors have pulled advertising from Limbaugh, over concerns about the content of his show.
So, what is the true liberal view of sponsor boycotts? Are sponsor boycotts good when sponsors object to programming? Or are they only okay when sponsors object to conservatism?
Who said, “I didn’t give ‘em hell: I gave ‘em truth, and it felt like hell.”(?) An honest depiction of Islam must include (1) A good muslim is duty bound to lie to unbelievers if the lie(s) benefit Islam, and (2) A very good muslim is duty bound to contribute to the chaos that should bring the twelfth mullah. These two things alone are enough to make Islam, like Marxism, an ideology which must never compromise, but must conquer. I’ve known individuals like this. Most of them are in prisons, graves, or mental wards, and rightly so. What to do, what to do?