Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fanatics Building Nukes? Shaky Economy? $5 Gas? Mittwitt zots? We're Worried About Pimping RINOs
www.stolinsky.com ^ | 03-12-12 | stolinsky

Posted on 03/11/2012 9:33:07 PM PDT by stolinsky

 

Fanatics Building Nukes? Economy Shaky? $5 Gas?

We’re Worried About Romney’s Underwear

David C. Stolinsky
Mar. 12, 2012

Years ago, a colleague told me about an incident he’d observed. A group of interns and residents had been swamped with admitting acutely ill patients. They’d gotten no sleep all night, and were unshaven and bedraggled next morning. The chief arrived to make rounds. But instead of helping the bleary-eyed staff care for the patients, he spent time arranging their black bags neatly at the nurses’ station, then yelled at the young doctors for not looking spiffy and wearing neckties.

In addition to demonstrating his bad temper and small-mindedness, the chief did so in the presence of nurses and patients, thus violating a basic principle of leadership: Don’t undermine your subordinates’ authority.

My colleague concluded with bitter irony, “You’ve got to know what’s important.”

We’ve all seen people like that, obsessed with irrelevant trivia while ignoring what is truly significant. In an ordinary office, this is annoying. But it’s really dangerous when human lives and well-being are at stake. This is obviously true in a hospital or in the military. It is equally true, though perhaps less obvious, in politics.

This November we will decide the fate of our republic, and perhaps that of the free world. Choosing who will lead us at this critical time is a heavy responsibility, among the heaviest we will face in our lifetimes. But what are we arguing about? Yes, there are serious commentators like Charles Krauthammer, Hugh Hewitt, and Dennis Prager. But what are the airwaves, the Internet, and the newspapers filled with? What are so many people squandering their time and energy discussing?

“Romney underwear” yields 2,970,000 hits on Google, while “magic underwear” yields 42,500,000 hits. Liberals from the New York Times on down − or on up, depending on your point of view − have ridiculed Mitt Romney for wearing “magic underwear.”

This is pure religious bigotry. Devout Mormons wear underwear of a special design, to remind them that they are always subject to God’s commandments. This is in no way different from wearing a cross or a Star of David around the neck, or a bracelet commemorating an active-duty or fallen warrior around the wrist. It is a reminder of an obligation, a word that is little used today. We speak incessantly about our rights, but rarely about our obligations. We have forgotten that we can’t keep one without keeping the other.

I am especially sensitive to this issue, because my grandfathers were Orthodox Jews. Although they died before I was born, I believe they both wore the fringed garments under their shirts that are mentioned by the Bible in Numbers 15:38-39 and Deuteronomy 22:12. Perhaps you have seen Orthodox men with fringes hanging from under their shirts. Or perhaps you haven’t.

But in either case, they are not “magic underwear.” They are reminders that God’s commandments are binding upon us wherever we go. What was true for my grandfathers is equally true for observant members of the LDS Church. So perhaps you can understand why I take personal offense at sarcastic, belittling remarks about “magic underwear.”

I have no statistical proof, but it seems that most of the derisive comments about Mormons’ “magic underwear” come not from devout Christians, who have legitimate questions about Mormon theology, but from secular leftists, who look down on all religion. No, that isn’t quite right. Secular leftists look down on all religion, but they save their vitriol for Christianity, especially Evangelical Protestants, practicing Catholics, and now Mormons − that is, people who take their religion seriously and tend to be conservative.

Secular leftists may look down on radical Islam as well, but to a major extent, they maintain a cautious silence on the subject − thus demonstrating that in addition to being anti-religious bigots, they are also cowards. Bigotry plus cowardice make a really unappetizing combination plate.

But I’m not letting devout Christians off the hook here. With some notable exceptions, they too say little about the persecution of fellow Christians in Muslim countries. This persecution has reached homicidal proportions. Yet many Christian leaders seem oddly unconcerned. Instead, they obsess about LDS theology, which is clearly in conflict with orthodox Christianity, but which has nothing − repeat, nothing − to do with a candidate’s ability to carry out the duties of president.

As leading Southern Baptist Pastor Robert Jeffress declared:

I’d rather a non-Christian like Romney who accepts biblical positions than a professing Christian like Barack Obama who accepts non-biblical views.

But instead of taking this common-sense approach, many Christians − and many secular leftists − gloss over the crucial issues that will be decided on Election Day:

● They gloss over an ever-larger government usurping the rights of our citizens. Isn’t this a moral as well as a political issue?

● They gloss over the expanding nanny state that controls everything from light bulbs and toilets to dishwasher detergent to what our kids eat for lunch. Yes, this is a moral issue. It means the demotion of the individual human being created in God’s image to a mere servant of the state.

● They gloss over a government that spends money it doesn’t have, and never will have, by heaping debt on our children and grandchildren. Talk about taxation without representation. And this too is a moral issue.

● They gloss over plans to gut our national defense in an increasingly dangerous world, where fanatics scream “death to America!” while building nuclear weapons and the missiles to deliver them. That is a matter of life and death.

There are serious questions about selecting Mitt Romney to be our president. He has shifted his positions on important issues like government-run health care, abortion, and gun control. These shifting positions leave us in doubt about his core beliefs. Let us discuss these important issues.

But instead, like my colleague’s medical chief who argued about neckties instead of caring for patients, some people ignore the important while wasting their time and energy on the trivial. There is no perfect candidate. And if there were a perfect candidate, he would want perfect voters, which surely leaves me out.

Like all of us, Mitt Romney has problems. But his underwear is not among them. As my colleague said, you’ve got to know what’s important.

Dr. Stolinsky writes on political and social issues. Contact: dstol@prodigy.net. You are welcome to publish or post these articles, provided that you cite the author and website.


TOPICS: Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: bigotry; mormonism; romney; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2012 9:33:13 PM PDT by stolinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

I will not vote the enemy into our camp. I will never vote Obama, but I will never vote Romney.

Nice try. I will not vote for the GOP Obama.

Third Party or write in. Just saying “he’s not Obama” doesn’t mean a whole lot to me.


2 posted on 03/11/2012 9:37:30 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

Thing is, a cheap nuke wouldn’t be all that hard. The first bomb over Japan was the “bullet” type. The basic idea is about the same as pushing a donut hole back into the donut to get critical mass. No fancy timers, switches, hi tech explosives needed.

Good chance you’d end up glowing in the dark after trying to machine the materials, though!


3 posted on 03/11/2012 9:40:05 PM PDT by djf (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

IBTZ!!!


4 posted on 03/11/2012 9:43:47 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Lazamataz for president!! NO MORE RINOS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
That is what they are counting on. Third party will split the vote and more likely to favor Obama. There are only 2 viable parties either Democrat or Republican sad but true.
5 posted on 03/11/2012 9:55:58 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

Devout Mormons wear underwear of a special design,
_________________________________________

Yeah with designs of FreeMasonry on their chest and knees..

designs which are ceremonially cut off and buried in secret when the undies wear out..

The magic underwear is to protect them from harm like bullets etc...

The founder of Mormonism Joey Smith also carried a Jupiter stone for luck and power and protection...it had pagan symbols on it..his family were heavily into the occult..

No the magic underwear are not intended to be like a cross or a Star of David..

and Mormons are not worried about remembering they might be subject to God’s Commandments...

They are not Christians or Jews...

They are Mormons

a whole other religion...

closer to Islam than Christianity...

The underwear is known as “magic” because the Mormons believe they have magic power to protect them...

They put their faith in the power of the undies and not in the power of God...

They first put them on after they are bathed and covered in oil by a “temple worker” in a Mormon ritual in the Mormon temple....

Its a requirement to wear them to keep their “temple recommend”

Once a year their bishop (a man asks them in private (enven the women) if they are wearing the magic undies all the time..

(I’d slap a guys face if he asked me about my undies)

Could you imagine your pastor getting your wife in a room alone and asking her if she is wearing a certain type of underwear ???

Do you not see something sinister and unrighteous in such a practice ???

and yet Mormon bishops do just that...

and dont ask me about the interviews they have with young children..

again alone...


6 posted on 03/11/2012 9:56:42 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

http://www.thunderwear.com/images/comfort.jpg
It just doesn’t look comfortable.


7 posted on 03/11/2012 10:00:02 PM PDT by tumblindice ( our new, happy lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

When Obama took office, gas was about $1.85/gal.

Now, 3 1/2 years later, gas is about $3.70/gal.

Re-elect this Commie, fast forward 4 years and, voila, his dream - $8/gallon!


8 posted on 03/11/2012 10:05:33 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

Do not send me any more underhanded stealth FReepMails

If you are man enough to say something say it to my face here in the thread...

Your credibility at present is ZERO

equal to the guy in the White House...


9 posted on 03/11/2012 10:14:26 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

1. The primaries aren’t over yet. Criticizing Romney doesn’t mean that one doesn’t understand the importance of removing Obama. Most of those critical of Romney don’t care much about his underwear anyway. They care more about the fact that he is a liberal and also that he may not be the best candidate to face Obama, mainly because of his liberal record.

2. You’re just plain wrong about Mormon temple garments and Jewish fringed garments serving the same purpose. For Mormons, it’s not just a reminder, they are taught that the garment offers them some supernatural protection, which is why people deride them as “magic underwear”.

3. I don’t get the impression Christians are unconcerned about persecution at all, however, what would Christian leaders speaking out more about this accomplish? Christian leaders have less than zero influence over the governments of Muslim countries. At the moment, they have very little influence even over our own government, which has shown no interest in angering the Muslim world. Muslims persecute Christians because that is what Muslims do, and the persecution will continue until there are no more Muslim countries, or until there are no more Christians in those countries, absent some miraculous intervention.


10 posted on 03/11/2012 10:17:29 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

“They gloss over an ever-larger government usurping the rights of our citizens.”

We don’t here on FR.

“They gloss over the expanding nanny state that controls everything from light bulbs and toilets to dishwasher detergent to what our kids eat for lunch. “

Not here on FR.

“They gloss over a government that spends money it doesn’t have,...”

We don’t gloss over that here.

“They gloss over plans to gut our national defense ...”

We don’t gloss over that either.

We don’t ignore Mitt and his magic underwear, nor do we ignore Mitts pro abortion history, his inventing and promoting Obama care, nor his anti 2nd Amendment activities, nor his flip flopping. Nor do we ignore his saying whatever he thinks his audience wants to hear instead of the truth, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum.

In a nutshell, Doc, we don’t gloss over much at all, but we DO NOT support Romney. Not those of us with Conservative principles and a spine.

Regardless of what you post up on that blog you are pimping, we are NOT going to support Romney.


11 posted on 03/11/2012 10:25:00 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
Good chance you’d end up glowing in the dark after trying to machine the materials, though!

Plutonium yes, but uranium is easy to work with.

12 posted on 03/11/2012 10:31:07 PM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

Obama is a socialist. Romney is a socialist. Magic underwear makes zero difference to me whatsoever. I couldn’t care less he’s a Mormon. But he’s a socialist. He supported an “assault” weapons ban. He wrote socialist healthcare into law. That’s what matters. It’s just like Obama being black. His being black makes no difference to me - but his funding of green energy firms that he’s personally invested in, his running the Gunwalker effort through ATF, his non-prosecution of the criminals at MF Global, his apology tours for America - those are what matter to me. But many try to represent that the opposition to Obama is simply “racist” just as they try to represent that the opposition to Romney is just because he’s Mormon. Well, it’s not.


13 posted on 03/11/2012 10:36:37 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

I read a book about the Manhattan Project years back. It was alot about Oppenheimer and the tech stuff and the testing, but there was an interesting aside.

Seems one of the professors (and this might have been at Chicago where the first running reactor was put together) liked to show his class the reaction that happened when two sub-critical masses of uranium were pushed closer. You know, it would heat up and start to emit alot of neutron radiation, I guess it can be pretty exciting.

Until one time when he pushed them too close.

Quite a clean up job ensued. He went to meet his maker.


14 posted on 03/11/2012 10:39:53 PM PDT by djf (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

Hairy Reid is a Mormon and runs the Senate.


15 posted on 03/11/2012 10:53:11 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
>”Hairy Reid is a Mormon and runs the Senate”<

Coincidentally, Harry Reid is also a MORON and runs the Senate.

16 posted on 03/11/2012 10:56:16 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

Underwear aside, make the case for your guy.


17 posted on 03/11/2012 11:00:03 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

No we’re not, dingus. We’re worried about making a liberal the standard-bearer for the supposedly conservative Republican Party. If that happens, I’ll consider myself an ex-Republican until Romney has lost the election.


18 posted on 03/11/2012 11:01:17 PM PDT by Antoninus (Goal #1: Defeat Romney. Goal #2: Defeat Obama. If we don't achieve both goals, 2012 is a loss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Dang!


19 posted on 03/11/2012 11:01:56 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

I’m not afraid of Romney’s underwear or religion. I’m afraid of the fact that when he was the most conservative candidate in the 2008 primary he folded way too soon. Now that he is the least conservative candidate in the 2012 primary he has suddenly found his will to fight. What happens when he defeats the conservatives? Will he be too tired to fight the liberal in the General Election? He doesn’t have a very good track against candidates who are more liberal than him. I’m taking wagers on whether he will drop out during the second debate or the third debate against Obama.


20 posted on 03/11/2012 11:02:04 PM PDT by Infralutheran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

I’m worried about Romney’s liberalism. Don’t tell me he’s not a liberal he is.


21 posted on 03/11/2012 11:32:21 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Could be.

I’m amazed at the number of people who think “Google hits” actually means something. It’s a really, really dumb way to calculate significance.

He said ‘“Romney underwear” yields 2,970,000 hits on Google’

Big deal. These unrelated terms do about the same:

Satan Honda peanut butter sandwich

About 2,400,000 results (0.26 seconds)


22 posted on 03/11/2012 11:47:32 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, 5:13; John 3:17-18, 6:69, 11:25, 14:6, 20:31; Rom10:8-11; 1 Tim 2:5; Titus 3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Infralutheran

Nuclear Underwear! Holy Cow!....I mean well...Holy Underwears...Nuclear? Those would leave a mark...Holy Toledo!


23 posted on 03/12/2012 2:26:19 AM PDT by DJlaysitup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
No disagreement here.

Morons are morons and Congress has plenty.....

24 posted on 03/12/2012 3:35:00 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky
The problem with Romney is not his underwear, it is his penchant for going wherever the political winds blow him. He is not a conservative or a liberal. He is an opportunist.

I guarantee: If Romney wins the Pub nomination, he will immediately move Left of political center & stay there. Once again, we will have a Clinton type of Presidency, ignoring the people & beholding only to the cronies.

25 posted on 03/12/2012 4:20:26 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

Will not vote for Romney.

IF ROmney-the-DNC’sRINO is on the ticket,
we will work AGAINST the GOP ticket.

Romney is Obama. Obama is Romney.


26 posted on 03/12/2012 4:40:25 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky
You're in the ozone zone, pushing Romney on FR.

Even if it is Obama v Romney, I will NOT vote for the gun-grabbing, global-warming-cap-and-trade-pushing, UN-loving, commie-health-care-signing statist Romney. No way, no how, even if Obama is re-elected.

Since I believe a collapse is inevitable, I think it's better to get it over with on Obama's watch that have Romney get there at a slower speed, with the Republicans supporting "their guy" all the way.

A pox on all of them.

27 posted on 03/12/2012 7:39:56 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (I will vote against ANY presidential candidate who had non-citizen parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky; TheOldLady; Old Sarge; darkwing104; Darksheare
romneybot gets the ZOT!


28 posted on 03/12/2012 7:49:22 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky; Arrowhead1952; darkwing104; 50mm; SunkenCiv; humblegunner; Allegra; Eaker; Lazamataz; ...


So long, stolinsky (Posting History)

Hat Tip to Arrowhead1952

Die-pretty easy Mythens fan finds that magic panties do not protect him from getting fried into Viking Kitty fritters





No RINOs - Plain English: NO RINOs


Thank you JoeProBono

FReepmail TheOldLady to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.

29 posted on 03/12/2012 9:26:03 AM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky
Dr. Stolinsky writes on political and social issues.

He also writes about himself in the third person, the twit.


30 posted on 03/12/2012 9:59:56 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Satan Honda peanut butter sandwich

About 2,400,000 results (0.26 seconds)

No surprise there, it is a great sandwich!

31 posted on 03/12/2012 10:10:34 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Eccl 10 v. 19 A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

I note your keyword “bigotry” and note that you bent over backwards to NOT address Romney’s record of liberal actions.

It is NOT bigotry to point out that Romney is pro-abortion, pro-homosexual marriage, pro-gun bans, and pro-taxpayer funded government run healthcare.
It is NOT bigotry to demand a candidate who has our interests at heart rather than being touchy feely with the enemy who wants our nation destroyed.

A song for you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg4dkiKTVMg


32 posted on 03/12/2012 10:23:36 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; F15Eagle

One does not just make a sandwich in Mordor.


33 posted on 03/12/2012 10:31:13 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; Darksheare

lol


34 posted on 03/12/2012 10:37:31 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, 5:13; John 3:17-18, 6:69, 11:25, 14:6, 20:31; Rom10:8-11; 1 Tim 2:5; Titus 3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All

He got excited about “Romney underwear” yields 2,970,000 hits on Google.

The fallacy of “Google hits” and why it is such a dumb way to calculate things.

Here’s another one with huge “results”.

Newt Gingrich underwear

About 22,100,000 results (0.31 seconds)

Obviously the web is freaked out there, too /huge anti-”Google hits” sarc


35 posted on 03/12/2012 10:41:46 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, 5:13; John 3:17-18, 6:69, 11:25, 14:6, 20:31; Rom10:8-11; 1 Tim 2:5; Titus 3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

I know, it’s a pretty lame thing to get excited over.


36 posted on 03/12/2012 10:50:28 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky

Claiming we are bigots for not supporting Romney is the same as claiming we are racist for not supporting Obama.


37 posted on 03/12/2012 11:10:22 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky
But I’m not letting devout Christians off the hook here.

Oh no! I'm not going to be able to sleep a wink tonight, not being able to get off your hook and all.

What to do, what to do, what to do?

38 posted on 03/12/2012 11:50:28 AM PDT by Col Freeper (FR is a smorgasbord of Conservative thoughts and ideas - dig in and enjoy it to its fullest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky; 50mm; darkwing104; Arrowhead1952; Darksheare; TheOldLady; Lady Jag; Allegra; Chode; ...
I was WONDERING if this WillardPimp was going to ride the lightning. His posting history was the vast majority of posts pimping his blog. And so...


39 posted on 03/12/2012 2:51:11 PM PDT by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

LOL! Great graphic group, Sarge.


40 posted on 03/12/2012 4:49:11 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky; 50mm; darkwing104; Arrowhead1952; Darksheare; onyx; TheOldLady; Lady Jag; Allegra; ...

RINOs!!We Don't Need No Stinking RINOs!!

41 posted on 03/12/2012 7:01:49 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdjY6oy4Y2c


42 posted on 03/12/2012 7:14:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Fallow and flatulent thoughts ..... At times ....


43 posted on 03/12/2012 8:21:00 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

No that takes some skill!


44 posted on 03/12/2012 8:50:52 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

>:0)


45 posted on 03/12/2012 8:51:50 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky
Like all of us, Mitt Romney has problems. But his underwear is not among them.

I saw him giving a speech using a teleprompter.

46 posted on 03/12/2012 9:02:31 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; stolinsky

You can eat his children now.


47 posted on 03/13/2012 7:23:26 PM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
"Nice try. I will not vote for the GOP Obama."

EGGSactly Batman! If one is going to vote for an Obama one should vote for the Original piece of crap and not a cheap imitation one from the Rhino party.

And since I will vote for neither I will write in or vote third party.

I'll Hold My Nose and vote for Newt or Santorum if either wins the Nomination but I ain't voting for The Mittwitt!

48 posted on 03/13/2012 7:30:22 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stolinsky; humblegunner; Lazamataz; TheOldLady; Old Sarge

This thread has been quiet for a few hours now, but I think one last comment is in order.

You were ~ZOTTED~ for being a MythbotRomneyTroll. This Zotting was richly deserved.

I would however not let the occasion pass without pointing out that you were a chancre on the skin of FreeRepublic. You are (were) an unrepentant BlogPimp of the worst sort. Possessed of that peculiar ego centrism that manifests itself in referring to oneself in the third person, you further demonstrated some time ago that you had ~ZERO~ sense of humor and skin thin enough to make the wing of the butterfly seem like armor plate in comparison.

Once you finally stopped excerpting your own work (of questionable merit on its face) you persisted in covering your posts with hyperlinks to who knows where in an attempt to draw traffic off site.

Well, you are now offsite permanently and precious few (dare I say “none?”) will follow you down that road of self-congratulatory intellectual vacuity redolent with the miasma of Liberal (RINO) apologetics.

Don’t let the door hit you where The Lord Himself split you.


49 posted on 03/14/2012 1:04:32 AM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

A most noble sentiment, FRiend!


50 posted on 03/14/2012 6:50:00 AM PDT by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson