Skip to comments.President Obama’s green energy-efficient lightbulb not a bright idea
Posted on 03/12/2012 2:28:33 PM PDT by Marketfly1
On one issue, President Barack Obama is depressingly consistent. Just this week, he once again sounded the alarm about the dangers of fossil fuels and the need to pursue alternative sources of energy. He is also determined to purse green energy projects, despite some well publicized disasters such as Solyndra. In spite of $535 million in federal government loans, the solar panel manufacturer went bankrupt. The administration was able to stage some nice photo opportunities, but the publics money was wasted.
(Excerpt) Read more at bayoubuzz.com ...
herman cain says you can get two bulbs for $99.99. If you want a dim bulb, call the white house.
Can anybody name just ONE good idea that has come from The Stain or any one of his Comrades?
It really interests me that the President of the United States can dictate to 300+ million people what type of light bulb we can use.
you mean a commie usurper dictating to 300 million people.
Can anyone tell me the incremental cost in terms of energy needed to produce one of these “high efficiency” bulbs over say a regular bulb? I mean, what’s the net gain if you expend more energy finding/refining/producing relatively exotic materials for these bulbs only to save a few cents in power? Has anyone really looked at the net gain (or loss) in energy by using these?
Oh, that's never the question asked.
It's "Can we afford to wait?" whined by the greens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.