Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) GOP-e Blames Romney’s Troubles on Newt’s Ego
March 15, 2012 | Vanity

Posted on 03/15/2012 3:24:06 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: rolling_stone

NO. The “Political Question” doctrine is a doctrine of constitutional interpretation. It not to be confused with political expediency. Please, first get informed of this.


41 posted on 03/16/2012 10:27:50 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I am informed of it, trust me..now answer my questions...


42 posted on 03/16/2012 10:30:05 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

If you are informed about it then this should answer your question.


43 posted on 03/16/2012 10:36:33 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Funny thing, I haven’t heard the GOP-e complain at all about Newt staying in. In fact, most encourage it.

All the FOX team didn’t seem to mind today.

Even Romney seemed okay with it on FOX and Friends.

but this is a vanity post LOL


44 posted on 03/16/2012 10:37:39 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Perhaps you could post a few links to some of what the GOP-e is saying when they are blaming Newt. We just want to see which person is saying this.


45 posted on 03/16/2012 10:41:15 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

How would I know what the Electoral College would do? I would guess NOT unless the majority of members in Congress are bat crazy and the voters who elect them are certifiably insane. Simply because one could point to a “parade of horribles” that could happen under our constitution doesn’t mean it will.


46 posted on 03/16/2012 11:13:11 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
If you are informed about it then this should answer your question.

I had several questions, and am awaiting your answer.

NBC is know to be born to two citizen parents..if not why did Chester Arthur hide and burn his records?

Why did Congress recently try and pass 8 bills changing the definition of NBC?

You don’t change something or hide from something that is not in force.???

Do you agree?

..... So the child of two illegal aliens or a foundling of unknown parentage is eligible to be President of the US????(they are both currently citizens at birth)

According to your theory that is correct, do you stand by that?

Because its politically expedient???

IF not why then, I guess you are saying its a Political Question,? So that can change from one election to the next? What happened to the Constitution, is it then subject to Politics? Which parts are subject to politics and which are not?

47 posted on 03/16/2012 11:19:22 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

You have answered your own question. It’s up to Congress and the political branches (not the judiciary) to settle issues of this kind.


48 posted on 03/16/2012 11:25:27 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson