Skip to comments.Democrat sues to boot Obama from ballot
Posted on 03/20/2012 9:52:42 PM PDT by hope
Another lawsuit has been filed asking state officials to remove Barack Obamas name from the 2012 election ballot because he has not documented that he is eligible for the office, but this case in Florida has a twist: It was brought by a Democrat.
The case was filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch USA on behalf of Democrat Michael Voeltz, a registered member of the Democrat Party, voter, and taxpayer in Broward County, who was an eligible elector for the Florida Primary of Jan. 31, 2012.
Ads by Google
Mark levinListen to Conservative Talk Shows Right From Your Browser - For Free! www.ConservativeTalkNow.com Class Action ClaimsMaximizing Class Action Recoveries - Retroactive & Current Case Filing www.claimscompensation.com
As part of his responsibilities, the lawsuit explains, Voeltz took an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The historians of the future will be communists like Dear Reader.
“This makes the birther stuff look even more ridiculous than before.”
Are you saying Sheriff Joe is a kook?
It’s funny, all these after-birther really have a major dog in this fight and it ain’t the protecting the Constitution or rule of law.
So what’s your dog’s name? We know he’s got one. Obama? Republican establishment hack?
Which of your oxen are you trying to prevent being gored?
The dog’s name is “appeasing minorities so they don’t riot”.
the birth certificate is only ONE part of being classified a natural born citizen
to be considered a ‘natural born citizen’, as per the US Supreme court ruling minor v happersett (1874), the person must be born on US soil AS WELL AS be born to TWO citizen parents
and that’s the catch. 0bama has never denied his father was kenyan, a british subject. this is why the birth certificate is being offered up like a red herring to distract everyone.
the only thing the birth certificate COULD prove would be location of birth. his PARENTAGE is an entirely separate issue.
at BEST, 0bama is a US citizen... but there is NO WAY he is a natural born citizen
DEMAND your congress critter explain how someone that is a US citizen as well as ‘british by descent’ (which means you can pick up your british passport anytime you’d like) can possibly be a natural born citizen
if he were 30 we wouldn’t let him on the ballot. why is this any different?
Yep. That’s certainly a strong choice.
Aside from the obvious Obama-trolls, I think the Republican establishment hacks and media are trying to save their own skins. They are complicit.
I think their dog’s name is “I’m guilty too.”
actually, the dead give away are the flat black pixels on the scanned image. it’s simply not possible to get perfect black out of a scanner only on certain fields. the scanner’s ccd would provide an anti-alias effect across the color extremes, which is seen across the majority of the document.
it is an obvious forgery and should be persecuted.
of course, the investigation into whether or not 0bama is eligible to be on the ballot should focus on the fact that he was a british citizen and an American citizen at birth... and explaining how someone could have a choice while also being ‘natural born citizen’.
it’s simply not possible
Hard to tell. But the after-birthers (I like that) are delusional.
Quit posting nearly everything in Frontpage
I'm saying he beclowned himself. Sad too, Arpaio is a hero to me on immigration enforcement, but it appears he got suckered into the birther conspiracy nonsense and it will end up destroying much of his credibility. Always under fire for being tough on crime and illegals, he used to receive a significant amount of backing from influential conservatives (even if only token support) and he had enough influence to make his endorsement mean something. Now? He's going to be considered a fringe conspiracy guy and a lot of the support he had will evaporate. The result of this is that it will now be much easier for the left, media, civil rights demagogues, etc, to marginalize and force him from his job.
“The result of this is that it will now be much easier for the left, media, civil rights demagogues, etc, to marginalize and force him from his job.”
Oh please. There isn’t a day that goes by where Sheriff Joe is not being attacked by the left, media, civil rights demagogues.
If Republicans wanted to help Sheriff Joe they’d back him and his report and move on the crimes being committed here.
I’m sure the only “influential conservatives” Sheriff Joe cares about are those 250 citizen who requested he look into the issue.
Ah...there’s that “beclowned “ word again. No doubt you are a great fan of NRO. Establishment hacks like that word.
We all see through your charade. You’ve got to protect that ox.
“he had enough influence to make his endorsement mean something. Now? He’s going to be considered a fringe conspiracy guy”
Oh no. His endorsement will mean nothing. See your focus is all:
PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS
The document is definitely a computer driven cut and paste forgery. There's no getting around it.
I'm no scanner or computer expert, so if someone here could explain where Colburn is wrong or right, please let me know. Thanks.
Did you watch the video of the Sheriff's news conference? During the Conference the speaker clearly explained that they had done exactly the same thing, and it had produced many layers (such as 40) as well. They argued that a similar process should have produced many tens of layers, and not just 8.
They argued that the small number of layers is not a normal result when a document is scanned.
In other words, they addressed this issue directly in the March 1rst News conference. Just watch the video.
Registrar signatures on Obama and Nordyke twins' long form birth certificate:
Why are there two different names?
Did Hawaii have two or more registrars signing birth certificates at Kapiolani Hospital in Aug. 1961?
NOTE: It has been almost 1 year since Obama released his long form birth certificate last April 27, 2011, but yet Kapiolani Hospital officials have been conspicuously silent when it comes to coming out and verifying that Obama was indeed born there in June 1961 as stated on the long form birth certificate.
Why is that?
Why can't hospital officials conduct tours to show tourists the room where Obama's mother stayed while in the hospital?
I don't see how showing tourists Obama's mother's room would be breaking any medical privacy laws.
Also, Obama could quickly allow Kapiolani officials to release any records concerning his mother and allow the officials to talk to reporters about his mother, but for some unknown reason, Obama won't give Kapiolani officials such permission.
Why is that? What is Obama hiding?
You are be-clowning yourself.
The only thing ridiculous about this issue is the little yap dogs like you and Texas-Con-man that bark and chase as the car passes by.
The lack of commentary from Kapiolani or any other medical facility proves nothing. They have no obligation to admit anything, and quite likely some legal risk if they do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.