Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat sues to boot Obama from ballot
wnd ^ | 3/20/12 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/20/2012 9:52:42 PM PDT by hope

Another lawsuit has been filed asking state officials to remove Barack Obama’s name from the 2012 election ballot because he has not documented that he is eligible for the office, but this case in Florida has a twist: It was brought by a Democrat.

The case was filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch USA on behalf of Democrat Michael Voeltz, “a registered member of the Democrat Party, voter, and taxpayer in Broward County, who was an eligible elector for the Florida Primary of Jan. 31, 2012.”

Ads by Google

Mark levinListen to Conservative Talk Shows Right From Your Browser - For Free! www.ConservativeTalkNow.com Class Action ClaimsMaximizing Class Action Recoveries - Retroactive & Current Case Filing www.claimscompensation.com

As part of his responsibilities, the lawsuit explains, Voeltz took “an oath to ‘protect and defend’ the U.S. Constitution.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: eligibility; naturalborncitizen; obama; potuseligibility; usurper

1 posted on 03/20/2012 9:52:48 PM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hope

Phil Berg, (who INITIALLY raised this issue) was also a Democrat, a Hillary (sp) supporter. It’s not surprising, politicians always eat their own.


2 posted on 03/20/2012 10:04:36 PM PDT by JDW11235 (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/ AND "The fat, spoiled, complacent kid is going on a diet." -Unkus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

the way to succeed? Make obama the plaintiff ... as long as he is the defendant these lose.

(Hint: needed to kick obambi off of one ballot, primary or general and force him to go to court and prove his case.)
Not one state has done this thing correctly. What does that say about how much support out there?


3 posted on 03/20/2012 10:07:09 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (and I will not go to Illinois to campaign against MITT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ping to WND article on Larry Klayman FL challenge...


4 posted on 03/20/2012 10:40:56 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

Too little, too late.

Historians of the future will scratch their heads in astonishment that America allowed itself to be bamboozled by a demented racialist poseur and con artist who was never qualified to hold the office.


5 posted on 03/20/2012 11:13:36 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; tomdavidd; Freeper; Gvl_M3; Flotsam_Jetsome; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Another lawsuit has been filed asking state officials to remove Barack 0bama’s name from the 2012 election ballot because he has not documented that he is eligible for the office, but this case in Florida has a twist: It was brought by a Democrat.

Thanks, Seizethecarp.

6 posted on 03/20/2012 11:15:37 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hope

As one will say!

” Very Interesting! and a Huge Ray of Hope for America and the Freedoms We cherish and honor in America!”


7 posted on 03/20/2012 11:16:02 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD SAVE OUR AMERICA from ALLAH and his Prophet, HUSSEIN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

As one will say!

” Very Interesting! and a Huge Ray of Hope for America and the Freedoms We cherish and honor in America!”


8 posted on 03/20/2012 11:16:02 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD SAVE OUR AMERICA from ALLAH and his Prophet, HUSSEIN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope
If Klayman works with the super sonic speed and precision engineered efficiency he maintained during the Clinton years, he'll get his first Obama eligibility deposition during Malia's second term.

However...the PayPal button is on duty...24/7.

Help us Larry Klayman...you're our next new last false hope.

9 posted on 03/20/2012 11:27:47 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Amen! And where was the Republican Party in their Operations
Research? They allowed the Demorat Party to swarm all over
Sarah Palindrome and never question one facet of Obama Hussein
And the Demorats!


10 posted on 03/20/2012 11:39:12 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD SAVE OUR AMERICA from ALLAH and his Prophet, HUSSEIN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
he'll get his first Obama eligibility deposition during Malia's second term.

Thanks for the laugh, but so true. Methodical is one thing but slow is another that always leaves us at the back of the race.
11 posted on 03/21/2012 12:00:45 AM PDT by JSteff ((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Historians of the future will scratch their heads in astonishment that America allowed itself to be bamboozled by a demented racialist poseur and con artist who was never qualified to hold the office.

It REALLY doesn't make a lot of sense. You have got to wonder what is driving it, other than Satan himself. Where did they get all of this control? How come the people that are suppose to be the Conservatives seem so impotent and do not seem to have a grip on anything?

We must all call out to God.

12 posted on 03/21/2012 12:07:46 AM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hope
Ken Colburn, Arizona computer expert. Anyone here heard of him?
1. I accidentally found his recent Arizona tv interview on the internet.

2. He seem to question the sheriff's claim that Obama’s long form birth certificate is a fake.

3. He talked about how an employee at his company used his own Arizona birth certificate to run through the company's special scanner-—it supposedly is much better than consumer type scanners that the sheriff might have used, according to Colburn-—and the employee discovered that his original birth certificate showed at least 40 layers.

4. Colburn’s point seems to be: If the sheriff was pointing to the fact that Obama’s long form birth certificate had many layers in order to prove that it was a fake, then the sheriff could be wrong, because his employee's original certificate-—it is displayed during the tv interview-—also showed many layers-—at least 40-—when it was scanned.

5. I'm no scanner or computer expert, so if someone here could explain where Colburn is wrong or right, please let me know. Thanks.

13 posted on 03/21/2012 12:13:38 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

It’s not just the layers, it’s the manipulation.


14 posted on 03/21/2012 12:23:51 AM PDT by MarkeyD (Obama is a victim of Affirmative Action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

It’s not just the layers, it’s the manipulation.


15 posted on 03/21/2012 12:24:02 AM PDT by MarkeyD (Obama is a victim of Affirmative Action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

I think the idea was that the Obama PDF should divide into more layers if it was manipulated (optimized and/or OCR) as was claimed. The number of layers is more consistent with a document that has been built rather than scanned.


16 posted on 03/21/2012 1:10:43 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

It’s not the number of layers, <>per se</I> — it is the anomalies within and between image fragments...


17 posted on 03/21/2012 2:10:54 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

I’m not at a place where I can watch it now, but I think this is the video that talks briefly about this guy in the beginning.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/03/sheriff-joe-on-obama-investigation.html

He is basically proving the Cold Case Posse is correct he just doesn’t know it.

If I recall correctly (and you would have to watch Sheriff Joe’s press conference where they explain how many layers one would get if one did what this guy says he did) he’s right that you do get 40-some layers. The problem is that Obama’s forged birth certificate only has 7 or 9 layers.

I can’t look it up right now but that’s a start for you.


18 posted on 03/21/2012 3:25:28 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

You’re prescient; that’s exactly how History will view these terrible 4 years - and apparently 4 more if we don’t rid ourselves of that POS - and decline of America.


19 posted on 03/21/2012 3:55:19 AM PDT by carriage_hill (I'll "vote for an orange juice can", over Barry 0bummer and another 4yrs of his Regime From Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
If Klayman works with the super sonic speed and precision engineered efficiency he maintained during the Clinton years, he'll get his first Obama eligibility deposition during Malia's second term.

However...the PayPal button is on duty...24/7.

Help us Larry Klayman...you're our next new last false hope.

Now that was funny!

Klayman is a joke. This makes the birther stuff look even more ridiculous than before.

20 posted on 03/21/2012 5:08:33 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

The historians of the future will be communists like Dear Reader.


21 posted on 03/21/2012 5:12:01 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969; All

“This makes the birther stuff look even more ridiculous than before.”

Are you saying Sheriff Joe is a kook?

It’s funny, all these after-birther really have a major dog in this fight and it ain’t the protecting the Constitution or rule of law.

So what’s your dog’s name? We know he’s got one. Obama? Republican establishment hack?

Which of your oxen are you trying to prevent being gored?


22 posted on 03/21/2012 5:30:22 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

The dog’s name is “appeasing minorities so they don’t riot”.


23 posted on 03/21/2012 5:36:30 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: hope

the birth certificate is only ONE part of being classified a natural born citizen

to be considered a ‘natural born citizen’, as per the US Supreme court ruling minor v happersett (1874), the person must be born on US soil AS WELL AS be born to TWO citizen parents

and that’s the catch. 0bama has never denied his father was kenyan, a british subject. this is why the birth certificate is being offered up like a red herring to distract everyone.

the only thing the birth certificate COULD prove would be location of birth. his PARENTAGE is an entirely separate issue.

at BEST, 0bama is a US citizen... but there is NO WAY he is a natural born citizen

DEMAND your congress critter explain how someone that is a US citizen as well as ‘british by descent’ (which means you can pick up your british passport anytime you’d like) can possibly be a natural born citizen

if he were 30 we wouldn’t let him on the ballot. why is this any different?


24 posted on 03/21/2012 5:37:14 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Yep. That’s certainly a strong choice.

Aside from the obvious Obama-trolls, I think the Republican establishment hacks and media are trying to save their own skins. They are complicit.

I think their dog’s name is “I’m guilty too.”


25 posted on 03/21/2012 5:40:58 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

actually, the dead give away are the flat black pixels on the scanned image. it’s simply not possible to get perfect black out of a scanner only on certain fields. the scanner’s ccd would provide an anti-alias effect across the color extremes, which is seen across the majority of the document.

it is an obvious forgery and should be persecuted.

of course, the investigation into whether or not 0bama is eligible to be on the ballot should focus on the fact that he was a british citizen and an American citizen at birth... and explaining how someone could have a choice while also being ‘natural born citizen’.

it’s simply not possible


26 posted on 03/21/2012 5:44:38 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
Which of your oxen are you trying to prevent being gored?

Hard to tell. But the after-birthers (I like that) are delusional.

27 posted on 03/21/2012 6:04:07 AM PDT by ILS21R (John Locke: When the social contract is broken, the people must revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: hope

Quit posting nearly everything in Frontpage


28 posted on 03/21/2012 6:04:35 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

No problem.


29 posted on 03/21/2012 6:20:30 AM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
Are you saying Sheriff Joe is a kook?

I'm saying he beclowned himself. Sad too, Arpaio is a hero to me on immigration enforcement, but it appears he got suckered into the birther conspiracy nonsense and it will end up destroying much of his credibility. Always under fire for being tough on crime and illegals, he used to receive a significant amount of backing from influential conservatives (even if only token support) and he had enough influence to make his endorsement mean something. Now? He's going to be considered a fringe conspiracy guy and a lot of the support he had will evaporate. The result of this is that it will now be much easier for the left, media, civil rights demagogues, etc, to marginalize and force him from his job.

30 posted on 03/21/2012 7:04:24 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

“The result of this is that it will now be much easier for the left, media, civil rights demagogues, etc, to marginalize and force him from his job.”

Oh please. There isn’t a day that goes by where Sheriff Joe is not being attacked by the left, media, civil rights demagogues.

If Republicans wanted to help Sheriff Joe they’d back him and his report and move on the crimes being committed here.

I’m sure the only “influential conservatives” Sheriff Joe cares about are those 250 citizen who requested he look into the issue.

Ah...there’s that “beclowned “ word again. No doubt you are a great fan of NRO. Establishment hacks like that word.

We all see through your charade. You’ve got to protect that ox.


31 posted on 03/21/2012 7:36:16 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

“he had enough influence to make his endorsement mean something. Now? He’s going to be considered a fringe conspiracy guy”

Oh no. His endorsement will mean nothing. See your focus is all:

PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS, PARTY POLITICS


32 posted on 03/21/2012 7:42:30 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
There are also several check boxes that have been copied and pasted in the document. They are verbatim duplicates. No difference in pixel counts and positions. That is in fact impossible.

The document is definitely a computer driven cut and paste forgery. There's no getting around it.

33 posted on 03/21/2012 8:20:15 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
4. Colburn’s point seems to be: If the sheriff was pointing to the fact that Obama’s long form birth certificate had many layers in order to prove that it was a fake, then the sheriff could be wrong, because his employee's original certificate-—it is displayed during the tv interview-—also showed many layers-—at least 40-—when it was scanned.

I'm no scanner or computer expert, so if someone here could explain where Colburn is wrong or right, please let me know. Thanks.

Did you watch the video of the Sheriff's news conference? During the Conference the speaker clearly explained that they had done exactly the same thing, and it had produced many layers (such as 40) as well. They argued that a similar process should have produced many tens of layers, and not just 8.

They argued that the small number of layers is not a normal result when a document is scanned.

In other words, they addressed this issue directly in the March 1rst News conference. Just watch the video.

34 posted on 03/21/2012 10:13:20 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
The document is definitely a computer driven cut and paste forgery. There's no getting around it.

********

Registrar signatures on Obama and Nordyke twins' long form birth certificate:

Why are there two different names?

Did Hawaii have two or more registrars signing birth certificates at Kapiolani Hospital in Aug. 1961?

NOTE: It has been almost 1 year since Obama released his long form birth certificate last April 27, 2011, but yet Kapiolani Hospital officials have been conspicuously silent when it comes to coming out and verifying that Obama was indeed born there in June 1961 as stated on the long form birth certificate.

Why is that?

Why can't hospital officials conduct tours to show tourists the room where Obama's mother stayed while in the hospital?

I don't see how showing tourists Obama's mother's room would be breaking any medical privacy laws.

Also, Obama could quickly allow Kapiolani officials to release any records concerning his mother and allow the officials to talk to reporters about his mother, but for some unknown reason, Obama won't give Kapiolani officials such permission.

Why is that? What is Obama hiding?

35 posted on 03/21/2012 10:14:48 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

You are be-clowning yourself.

(/s)


36 posted on 03/21/2012 10:14:57 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969; Tex-Con-Man
Klayman is a joke. This makes the birther stuff look even more ridiculous than before.

The only thing ridiculous about this issue is the little yap dogs like you and Texas-Con-man that bark and chase as the car passes by.

37 posted on 03/21/2012 10:16:29 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
Also, Obama could quickly allow Kapiolani officials to release any records concerning his mother and allow the officials to talk to reporters about his mother, but for some unknown reason, Obama won't give Kapiolani officials such permission.

The lack of commentary from Kapiolani or any other medical facility proves nothing. They have no obligation to admit anything, and quite likely some legal risk if they do.

38 posted on 03/21/2012 10:21:17 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson