Wish I could. "Me experimentalist....ugh". Hopefully one of the physicists here will chime in.
I'm "just" finishing Ed Storms book, and between that book and these two presentations, "gobsmacked" is a good description of my current state of mind. With all the available evidence, how ANYBODY (after actually examining same) can conclude that CF/LENR/LANR is not "real" is, IMO, either nuts or plainly dishonest.
With all the available evidence, how ANYBODY (after actually examining same) can conclude that CF/LENR/LANR is not “real” is, IMO, either nuts or plainly dishonest.
***1) They don’t read the evidence
2) They don’t understand the evidence they’re aware of, so the field suffers from a certain aversion just to even talk about it
3) They are bandwagon jumpers. No need to think through the evidence that way.
4) Basically it’s a form of mental laziness.
5) They have a distorted view of how science works. For instance, we’ve seen plenty of times that people actually believe that theory comes before implementation, which is often not the case at all.
6) They have a vested interest in a negative outcome, such as hot-fusion phycisists who bring in hundreds of $millions in research grants.