Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

14 U.S. Governors: Prepare State Militia Defenses, to Be Ready Against Obama’s Rogue Federal Forces!
The Blade Report ^ | 3/23/2012 | Editor, The Blade Report

Posted on 03/24/2012 12:14:58 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe

Obama fearing a revolution against him by the states, has moved swiftly by nationalizing nearly all National Guard Forces in multiple states; Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, Minnesota, Tennessee, Virginia, Louisiana, South Carolina – to name a few. The Governors of the Great States of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia still have under their Command-and-Control the State Defense Forces to go against U.S. Federal forces should the need arise. Also important to note: There are NO U.S. laws prohibiting National Guard troops from also joining their State’s Defense Forces. This dilemma occurred during the Civil War with many “citizen soldiers” choosing to serve their states instead of the Federal Government.

Obama is angered by the several State Governors who have reestablished “State Defense Forces.” These forces are described as: “State Defense Forces (also known as State Guards, State Military Reserves, State Militias) in the United States are military units that operate under the sole authority of a state government; they are not regulated by the National Guard Bureau nor are they part of the Army National Guard of the United States. State Defense Forces are authorized by state and federal law and are under the command of the governor of each state. State Defense Forces are distinct from their state’s National Guard in that they cannot become federal entities.”

Mr. Obama is fearful of these State Defense Forces, in that he does not have control of said forces, and with the U.S. Military stretched to near breaking from multiple deployments and theatre actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, these State military forces would be under the direct command and authority of the Governors in which states have said forces. In essence, the Governors would have “de facto control” of the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at thebladereport.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2ndamendment; banglist; bhofascism; donttreadonme; fedmob; gangstergovernment; militia; molonlabe; nationalguard; nobama2012; obama; tyranny; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last
Read the whole thing. WOW.

(Admin Mod: abbreviated "United States" in title, in order to meet title size restriction.)

1 posted on 03/24/2012 12:15:07 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
Obama fearing a revolution against him by the states, has moved swiftly by nationalizing nearly all National Guard Forces in multiple states; Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, Minnesota, Tennessee, Virginia, Louisiana, South Carolina – to name a few.

But no link is provided to back up this key assertion.

2 posted on 03/24/2012 12:20:29 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Agree. Other than this, I have not read of obama nationalizing the Guard in any of the states.

That said, it probably is not a bad idea for the states to activate or start a militia, answering only to the state.
Because folks, sooner or later it is coming.

3 posted on 03/24/2012 12:25:19 PM PDT by Tupelo ( 2012 TEA PARTYER but no longer a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
The two Governors leading this move are: Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota; and Rick Perry, Governor of Texas.

Umm, Pawlenty is no longer governor of Minnesota...

4 posted on 03/24/2012 12:26:14 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
But no link is provided to back up this key assertion.

That's what I like about the Internet. Any time one reads an eyebrow-lifting article, the Killer Question is asked that will either give the item legs or kill it: "Source?"

In either event, it brings up an interesting question. During the Y2k flap it was reported that a Midwestern sheriff proposed deputizing all CCW holders in case things went bad. I wondered then, as I do now - suppose one did sign up for the "militia", THSHTF, and the governor called 'em out to serve in various parts of the state. Would guys leave their families in such times to serve elsewhere?

5 posted on 03/24/2012 12:29:35 PM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
All B Wacky has to do is Presidentially pardon all criminals. Then employ them in his private army.

Why else would he be buying up all that ammo?

6 posted on 03/24/2012 12:31:55 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Mohammedan law every woman must belong to a man will delay the end of slavery until Islam has ceased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Bflr


7 posted on 03/24/2012 12:33:26 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
The Virginia Defense Force history. The current Virginia Defense Force was established in 1985. I don't know how recent the other states started their defense forces.
8 posted on 03/24/2012 12:34:05 PM PDT by relee ('Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

sfl


9 posted on 03/24/2012 12:34:35 PM PDT by know-the-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
Utterly silly.

The two Governors leading this move are: Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota; and Rick Perry, Governor of Texas.

Apparently whoever wrote this nonsensical conspiracy theory is not aware Tim Pawlenty is no longer governor of Minnesota.

In essence, the Governors would have “de facto control” of the United States.

Laughable. I've seen the Virginia Defense Force people at various gun shows and they wouldn't be able to take control of squat.

10 posted on 03/24/2012 12:35:07 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe; LucyT; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; ...
Alarm clock on steroids (H/T to absolutely nobama) Ping.............

14 U.S. Governors: Prepare State Militia Defenses, to Be Ready Against Obama’s Rogue Federal Forces!

Maybe 0b0z0 is afraid of stopping his "sons" and H0lder's people?

11 posted on 03/24/2012 12:36:52 PM PDT by melancholy (Professor Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist, Ph.D in L0w and H0lder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo
That said, it probably is not a bad idea for the states to activate or start a militia, answering only to the state. Because folks, sooner or later it is coming.

If the Governors do not, whoever does may soon be Governor.

12 posted on 03/24/2012 12:40:19 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Same with TN. In fact, they’re not allowed to be armed.


13 posted on 03/24/2012 12:41:13 PM PDT by ebshumidors ( Marksmanship and YOUR heritage http://www.appleseedinfo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts


14 posted on 03/24/2012 12:41:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

NC still has a military structure buried in its constitution, although its been neglected since the 1800s, along with military spending.


15 posted on 03/24/2012 12:42:09 PM PDT by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I seriously doubt many US military or National Guard troops would take up arms against US citizens solely on Obama’s orders. I think Obama has more to fear from US military forces deposing him by force if he tries to make himself a dictator.


16 posted on 03/24/2012 12:43:13 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

The date on the posted article WAS December 15.


17 posted on 03/24/2012 12:44:54 PM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Search Youtube for videos of US troops going door to door and relieving Americans of their firearms during Katrina, then see if you still believe what you just said.


18 posted on 03/24/2012 12:49:48 PM PDT by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
The date on the posted article WAS December 15.

It was nonsense then too.

19 posted on 03/24/2012 12:51:44 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Agreed, also. This is inflammatory, and possible “boob bait,” but - that being said - the Peace of Appomattox hasn’t been this precarious in more than 40 years.


20 posted on 03/24/2012 12:55:34 PM PDT by Prospero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

You are 100% correct.


21 posted on 03/24/2012 12:56:44 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
There is a scene in the movie "Gods and Generals" which I suspect is an accurate portrayal of history, where General Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson appears before a large mass of men wearing gray or butternut uniforms.

Jackson reads a message from Abraham Lincoln advising the state of Virginia to raise a body of troops, in case any states choose to rebel against the federal government.

Jackson stops reading the message, looks out at the men before him and says, "Tell Mr. Lincoln, we have done so!"

22 posted on 03/24/2012 12:58:12 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Blacks get shot every day. What makes Trayvon so special? Democrat hype.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Laughable. I've seen the Virginia Defense Force people at various gun shows and they wouldn't be able to take control of squat.

You got that right. The VDF is barely a step above the Boy Scouts. In some cases, the Boy Scouts would have the upper hand. It's a shame because there are many retired colonels and generals in Old Dominion who could whip them in to shape (old school style) if they had the blessings of the Governor and the General Assembly.

23 posted on 03/24/2012 1:00:04 PM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

The lack of *relevant* citations in this article make it effectively meaningless. National Guard units have been actively involved in recent combat actions since Gulf War I under George H.W. Bush. To do so they have been put under federal command.

In fact, part of the 10th Amendment Movement is that in several states, they are so tired of their Guard being perpetually deployed that they want it returned. If the US military needs more personnel, it should hire more personnel, not loot the states for hot bodies.

But there is nothing new about this, other than Obama, at the request of the Pentagon, named the national commander of the National Guard to the Joint Chiefs. With the end of the Iraq and Afghanistan occupations, he will spend most of his time with TRADOC, just making sure that the NG are standardized and functional nationwide. No easy task.


24 posted on 03/24/2012 1:00:19 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." -- Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida
if they had the blessings of the Governor and the General Assembly.

There's the rub, right? When I lived in Northern Virginia, a "Major" in VDF tried to recruit me. I was unimpressed. It is obvious it is really just a volunteer labor and support organization, and NOT a funded and sanctioned "defense force".

It's a shame, too, because you're right. The squared away veteran officers and NCOs in VA could whip up a fine defense force if allowed.

25 posted on 03/24/2012 1:05:34 PM PDT by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

It’s easy to forget who started all of this nationalizing of the National Guard, GW Bush. Thank him.

While on your knees thanking him, don’t forget to thank his father GHW Bush for the Americans With Disabilities Act which has forced small businesses to close, raised costs for everyone, and basically made life miserable for most.

And, of course, don’t forget to give everloving praise to Richard Nixon, who, in many ways, has made the current $4 and $5 gas possible. Without his divine insights we would have drilled our way out of this mess decades ago.

Reoublicans,always looking out for us.


26 posted on 03/24/2012 1:08:00 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relee

FYI....Texas State Guard has a rather long history and is still active today with three branches. http://www.txusa.com/tsga/briefhist.html


27 posted on 03/24/2012 1:10:49 PM PDT by A_Tradition_Continues (formerly known as Politicalwit ...05/28/98 Class of '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
A friend (deceased) was a member of the South Dakota State Guard during WWII. Its mission was primarily manning and protecting National Guard facilities which had been vacated by units called up and deployed on Federal service.

South Dakota does not currently have State Guard units. But its legal code, SDCL 33-14, provides for forming such units. And with a significant veteran population, physically filling these units would not be difficult. So if necessary, old men would answer one last call to duty with boys probably answering their first call to duty.

With the D.C. jackasses hell-bent on creating Great Depression II and WWIII, the Several States and their citizens should start looking seriously at their State Guard capability.

28 posted on 03/24/2012 1:17:08 PM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

Interresting.


29 posted on 03/24/2012 1:19:56 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; Tupelo; Oatka; Prospero
Obama fearing a revolution against him by the states, has moved swiftly by nationalizing nearly all National Guard Forces in multiple states; Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, Minnesota, Tennessee, Virginia, Louisiana, South Carolina – to name a few.

But no link is provided to back up this key assertion.

--------------------------------

Well, I can give you an "unsupported affirmation" on this. I read in the last year that Obama had done another one of his EOs which asserted federal control over the state national guards, and raised some eyebrows at that time. As well as I can remember, the source was a good, legitimate source, not some half wit blog. But, I can't remember the source. So, I agree, this point needs to be researched and verified. But I believe there is good reason to take it seriously.

30 posted on 03/24/2012 1:33:11 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
"...part of the 10th Amendment Movement is that in several states, they are so tired of their Guard being perpetually deployed that they want it returned. If the US military needs more personnel, it should hire more personnel, not loot the states for hot bodies."

As I recall the history, when we went to an all volunteer force in the post-VietNam era, and placed increasing reliance on the USAR and ARNG, it was primarily the governors who were insistent on keeping the ARNG as combat arms unit (Infantry/Armor/Artillery etc.) and leaving the combat support and service support units in the Reserves. I think it had something to do with the funding attached.

31 posted on 03/24/2012 1:34:59 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Well, I can give you an "unsupported affirmation" on this. I read in the last year that Obama had done another one of his EOs which asserted federal control over the state national guards, and raised some eyebrows at that time

Do you seriously think that any Republican governors would fail to raise a major (and loud) stink if Obama were to infringe upon their own powers. Governors guard their powers zealously.

32 posted on 03/24/2012 1:47:18 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; Tupelo; Oatka; Prospero
Ok, some quick research. I was wrong in placing all of this on Obama. He is continuing down the path, though.

It appears this drive of the feds to assert more control over the NG has been going on some time. Sadly, the Republicans are just as complicit as the Dems in this.. Here is a useful piece on the subject from 2007:

Governors lose in power struggle over National Guard
By Kavan Peterson, Staff Writer

A little-noticed change in federal law packs an important change in who is in charge the next time a state is devastated by a disaster such as Hurricane Katrina.

To the dismay of the nation’s governors, the White House now will be empowered to go over a governor’s head and call up National Guard troops to aid a state in time of natural disasters or other public emergencies. Up to now, governors were the sole commanders in chief of citizen soldiers in local Guard units during emergencies within the state.

Full piece here:
http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=170453

33 posted on 03/24/2012 1:48:19 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Do you seriously think that any Republican governors would fail to raise a major (and loud) stink if Obama were to infringe upon their own powers. Governors guard their powers zealously.

In answer to that, he's been usurping state powers with EOs for 3-1/2 years. Also, the congress has been doing its share of it. I don't see that what protesting I've heard has done much good.

Specifically, though, I do recall him doing something to peel away another layer of state control regarding the NG. If I have time, maybe I can find it. My post #33 does add a little more information on the whole subject.

34 posted on 03/24/2012 1:54:56 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

All this possible bloodshed could have been prevented had Obama been properly vetted.

Many politicians from this and the prior administration have a lot to answer for including the GOP’s presidential candidates. They had access to Obama’s personal information.

The latter are keeping silent on this issue. Isn’t it important enough to comment on?


35 posted on 03/24/2012 2:07:13 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

This must be in preparation for Obama cancelling the election in 2012—due to a crisis of some sort. Terrorist attack maybe in October? Move on traitors who do not obey Obama’s dictates as presented by the MSM. Look to see internet closed, Radio stations seized—the arrest of Rush, Sarah Palin, hanity, Reagan, etc... Hate speech will be banned from the airwaves.
Only RINO Republicans will be permitted. Time to re-ajust my tin foil helmet least the thoughts leak out and be picked up by the black helicopters.


36 posted on 03/24/2012 2:18:16 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s; dirtboy; Tupelo; Oatka; Prospero

Given that the Governors of several States are named the Commander in Chief of [their State’s] National Guard by their State Constitution (ex: NM), neither the Senators nor the Representatives of such have the authority to cede that authority to the President.


37 posted on 03/24/2012 2:30:33 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
"Obama fearing a revolution against him by the states, has moved swiftly by nationalizing nearly all National Guard Forces in multiple states."

Umm...isn't the National Guard already under the control of the Congress ("nationalized")?
38 posted on 03/24/2012 2:44:11 PM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

The POTUS office means nothing and is a joke when people like the Clintons and the Obamas are in the office. We need a strong and courageous adult in that office who cares about America and her people which the Clintons and the Obamas clearly do not.

I have always thought obama was there illegally.


39 posted on 03/24/2012 2:47:42 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

And Sheriff Joe has ultimate authority over all of them.


40 posted on 03/24/2012 2:48:14 PM PDT by varina davis (A real American patriot -- Gov. Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Who dreams this shit up?


41 posted on 03/24/2012 2:48:34 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (A conservative, a liberal and a moderate walked into a bar; barkeep said "Hi Mitt")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist; All

“Presidentially pardon all criminals. Then employ them in his private army.” Don’t make me laugh. How would he discipline such a bunch of clowns?


42 posted on 03/24/2012 3:00:25 PM PDT by Silentgypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy
How much discipline does Burn Loot Rape Pillage, and Intimidate require?

Do you doubt their loyalty? He just freed them and gave them guns and a "job".

Remember Beelzebama did STATE ON RECORD he needs/wants a private army loyal to him. Just as large and well funded as the US military.

43 posted on 03/24/2012 3:55:17 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Mohammedan law every woman must belong to a man will delay the end of slavery until Islam has ceased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 101stAirborneVet

I thought it was the NO Police Dept.


44 posted on 03/24/2012 4:20:45 PM PDT by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Obama been laudin’ that martial law.. and this proves it.


45 posted on 03/24/2012 4:23:46 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
RE: How much discipline does Burn Loot Rape Pillage, and Intimidate require?

Loot and pillage before burn?

46 posted on 03/24/2012 4:26:01 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
All B Wacky has to do is Presidentially pardon all criminals.

Many more people are incarcerated (in state prisons) for violations of state laws than than there are for federal crimes. He doesn't have jurisdiction to pardon them. Even if he did have the authority, if it was obvious why he was doing it, you have to remember it's actually state DOC personnel drawing state paychecks who'd have to physically release them.

47 posted on 03/24/2012 5:42:52 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Virginia can take DC back in one day.


48 posted on 03/24/2012 5:46:15 PM PDT by bmwcyle (I am ready to serve Jesus on Earth because the GOP failed again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

Forget loot and burn. Rape has to come first.


49 posted on 03/24/2012 5:54:45 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

This is fairly nutty. I don’t know about all states, bu the Georgia State Defense Force does not issue or train with weapons, or allow its members to be armed while on duty. They pretty much act as search and rescue, medical support, crowd/traffic control, etc. when needed.

It’s a great organization to volunteer for, and they do good work, but they’re unarmed and couldn’t resist anyone, let alone the U.S. Army. Not that I think the Army would actually “invade” a U.S. state in the first place, even if Obama wanted it to.


50 posted on 03/24/2012 6:09:27 PM PDT by Turbopilot (iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson