Skip to comments.Pure Michiganís Bid For More Tax Money
Posted on 03/29/2012 6:41:21 PM PDT by MichCapCon
A new study on Michigans 2011 Pure Michigan advertising campaign repeats the common ploy of using "multiplier" analyses to defend some line items in the state budget. This technique is often used to justify government spending on everything from public transportation to film subsidies.
Multiplier analyses take some economic activity and estimate its net economic impacts. For example, it looks at something like a customer buying a pair of shoes, and estimates what effect the retailer's use of the proceeds from the sale has as that money flows through the economy. Though they often use overblown and sometimes erroneous assumptions, the real problem with such analyses is they rarely ask where the spending comes from in the first place (where did the shoe buyer get the money to buy the new pair, for example).
There are economic consequences to all actions you cant drop a dollar bill on a sidewalk without affecting commerce. In this case, the money taken from Michigan taxpayers to pay for tourism ads has an impact that's not considered by the economic models used to justify the ads.
These models are better used to compare spending items, all others being equal (which they never are). For instance, the multipliers from this item can be compared to those of arts subsidies, whose proponents argue that they have a 51-times multiplier.
Multiplier: "job creation"
RASCO corporate subsidy
Multiplier (in dollars): "increased economic activity"
Early Childhood Education
Earned Income Tax Credit
While multiplier analyses potentially could be used to weigh the economic consequences of different government spending programs, they appear most in the public arena to justify taking taxpayer resources.
Give us a website and we’ll promote Michigan on our own.
If anyone wants on the Michigan Cap Con pinglist let me know.
and how those sources might have used the money in a way that most likely would have benefited the economy more than the government.
There are plenty of us who would happily promote Michigan for free if we had a website to do it with. There would be administrative costs but it would be a fraction of what this pure Michigan crap costs.
The pure Michigan website is simply crap and they don’t seem to understand what brings visitors to Michigan. People primarily come to Michigan for the state and national forests, hunting and fishing Out door type stuff. Its also important to note who your visitors are and we get a lot of asians in the forests.
Wow, I thought everyone went to Michigan to visit Detroit! Hope they can turn the state around ... it’s been in bad hands, very bad hands, for a very long time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.