Skip to comments.Alabama Supreme Court: Serious Questions About Authenticity of Obama's Birth Certificates
Posted on 03/29/2012 8:49:07 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
Alabama Supreme Court Justice Notes Evidence Presented Raises Serious Questions to Authenticity of Both Obama's Birth Certificates.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio's and Mara Zebest's reports were included in the Petition submitted to the Alabama Supreme Court.
Alabama Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker noted in the Order to Strike Hugh McInnish's Petition for Writ of Mandamus:
"Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the "short form" and the "long form" birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public."
Here is the link to the judge's ruling:
Is there any good left in this world to overtake the evil that is so prevalent everywhere right now? Surely Obama will come down from his perch soon. His secret deals with Iran should be enough to impeach. Where are our leaders? He’s getting away with everything. Meantime his wife and daughters on another tax payer vacation.
Any ideas what is the "appropriate forum" the judge is talking about?
Forgery is a crime in all States and such a criminal act falls under the jurisdiction of Sheriff Arpaio. He is on the right track.
The appropriate forum is to show a physical, certified copy in a court of law. Any certified public record is considered “self-authenticating” under the Federal Rules of Evidence, with the idea being that both parties can examine the document and ensure that it contains the required certification elements ... or does not show obvious signs of forgery. As we know, the Kenyan coward, despite claiming to have TWO hard copies of a certified long form refused to show EITHER in the ballot hearing in Georgia ... in fact, he’s not shown them in ANY court of law. Finally, this sounds like a judge who gets it.
Sounds like a promising development. Hope something comes of it.
No, it’s a promising comment, but the Alabama Supreme Court still denied the petition. They said they didn’t have original jurisdiction in this matter. I haven’t seen the particulars on this case, but earlier this year, I had found election law in Alabama that indicated the state has the authority to keep Obama off the ballot. The courts have been playing a legal game of “pass the buck”, failing to acknowledge what the law actually allows.
Ping...... thought you might want to see this...:-)
Broken record here.
If the "forger" was an employee of the Department of Health in Hawaii, and if he was operating at the direction of a court order, then the "forgery" was legal and there is no criminal case.
Alabama must be in need of a new nuclear energy plant, or perhaps, they need Mobile Bay dredged.
Once their price is met this will sink into the muck never to be heard of again.
How is it “lawful” for a public official to “forge” a document?
Under what authority can a Judge or court order a public official to “forge” a document?
Rep Issa: Remember it is the SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGE and would
take almost zero dollars to find out who this guy really IS. What is the holdup?
Thanks for this notice.
Arpaio is scheduled for another public event tomorrow where I expect there will be more ruckus raised, escalating the calls for justice.
Thank you, seizethecarp.
Thanks, mel. Sheriff Joe has another press conference tomorrow. FReepers will be there and will be reporting back as to what happened...without the media spin.
Prayers for Joe.
I agree, being adopted and thus having a modified b.c. is NOT a crime, but-
Covering things up and stonewalling doesn’t help. Why didn’t 0 come out and say “hey, I was adopted, there’s gonna be a modified b.c. on file.”
Forging selective service docs IS a crime.
(Using somebody else’s social security number is ALSO a crime)
Need to look at all the pieces with this 0 fellow.