Skip to comments.Taxpayers' $1.4B 'Investment' in Nissan EV May Make Volt Look Good by Comparison
Posted on 04/06/2012 1:49:06 PM PDT by jazusamo
While General MotorsChevy Volt assembly workers are sidelined for five weeks (and more this summer) because demand for its strongly hyped electric car is weak, the prospects for its chief rival Nissans Leaf are shaky at best.
Nissan North America, Inc. a subsidiary of its Japanese parent is the beneficiary of a $1.4 billion Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturingloan from the U.S. Department of Energy, to convert a plant in Smyrna, Tenn. to produce the Leaf and batteries for it. The projects promoters say the alterations will lead to 1,300 new jobs, enabling Nissan to produce up to 150,000 Leafs and 200,000 battery packs per year, which will lead to the all-important avoidance of 204,000 tons of carbon dioxide emissions or so they say.
But theres just one problem: Sales of the Leaf are not much better than the Volts have been, and lately have been much worse. In 2011 Chevrolet sold 7,671 of its plug-in Volt, whose range is extended with the help of a small gasoline tank. Nissan sold 9,674 of the purely electric Leaf last year. So far through the end of March this year GM has delivered 4,095 Volts, while only 1,733 Leafs have been sold.
So if demand isnt strong enough to keep a GM line running to build the Volt, how can the current level of sales for the Leaf justify the enormous plant investment Nissan is making in Tennessee? USA Today reported a few weeks ago that as gasoline prices reach $4 per gallon, electric vehicles still face dark days. Industry expert LMC Automotive predicts EV sales will remain below 1 percent through 2017.
Why would this be? Because even with billions of dollars in investment from the government to helpFord, Nissan, Fisker,Tesla, andThe Vehicle Production Group build EVs, and to fund companies likeEcotality to build out a charging network at places like Cracker Barrel , the technology is impractical for most people. Besides the obvious range anxiety experienced by EV drivers, because the batteries dont maintain their charge long enough, theres the problem of lengthy times required to fill up again. Even the extremely expensive ($40,000 each) and hard-to-find fast-chargers (440 volt) take 30 minutes to get a Leaf going again for any reasonable distance, and most chargers require four to five hours to re-boost.
At least the Volt has a small gas engine that extends its range, although its (highly subsidized) $41,000 retail cost is still a lot to overcome for most consumers. But the Leaf is all-electric no juice, no go, which may be a big reason the Volt has inched past it in sales recently. One EV enthusiast had to stop and recharge his Leaf four times to travel 180 miles last year. Besides the facts that range is reduced even more by using heating and air conditioning, or by driving on inclines, there is the issue that you cant even depend on its battery gauge (the equivalent of a fuel gauge in a gas-powered car).
I am ready to turn over a new Leaf my own, wrote Rob Eshman, editor-in-chief of The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles.
While Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn (pictured) would obviously love to see sales of the Leaf take off, he has said (in so many words) that government subsidies are the reason for his pursuit of EV technology, rather than successes based upon qualities such as value, styling, safety rankings, or popularity with the purchasing public.
It does not matter if, for example, Portugal stops the incentives, as long as other countries like the United States continue to support, Ghosn told Reuters in October. If countries like France, Japan and the UK support and then China, that is about to start to support, that's fine.
The Brazilian-born Frenchman, who also chairs Renault, also does not hide the fact that he supports government control of markets and its attempts to stimulate technologies, no matter the cost.
We must diversify the energy mix used to fuel our vehicles, Ghosnwrote last month for Forbes. Petroleum-based fuels now account for 96 percent of the worlds automotive energy mix. By mandating targets and requirements at the level of the state, we can increase the mix of renewable fuels.
And, obviously, he believes in the states expenditure of billions of dollars on EVs. At this weeks New York International Auto Show, he repeated his assertion that Nissans future depended on development of EVs, predicting to the Wall Street Journal, when we get to 500,000 sales we can be profitable. He believes that goal will be attained in 2015-2016.
Meanwhile an analysis of fuel efficiency by the New York Times determined that it would take nine years before Leaf owners break even by saving money on gasoline versus the extra cost of the EV. That is a dubious assumption, since after that amount of time all or a lot of the depleted battery pack will need to be replaced. Time will tell, but if like most batteries it needs entire replacement, the cost is likely to exceed $30,000.
Nissan disputes that, of course. But is it worth risking the unknown for a vehicle that is only capable of traveling much fewer miles than would an equivalent gas-powered car such as the Nissan Versa or Chevy Cruze?
Not that that matters to Ghosn, since in his view, the purpose of the automobile business is to serve the collective through the manipulations of government.
We have a social responsibility to ensure that this industry grows sustainably, he wrote in his Forbes piece, and if we uphold our responsibility, we will increase the quality of life for everyone on our planet.
Paul Chesser is an associate fellow for the National Legal and Policy Center.
Barry and the ‘RATS are closing power plants everywhere while at the same time telling people to buy electric cars. I don’t get it. I guess the cars would make nice lawn ornaments.
More of our hard-earned tax dollars down the lib-dem-commie rabbit hole, after circling the drain for months.
Yep, but that’s the way Zer0 operates. The green thing is his thing and he’s never wrong, just ask him and he’ll tell you.
On another note. GM and their auto magazine supporters have been crowing for a couple days about the increased sales of the Volt in March. They’re going to open the Volt assembly line a week earlier than planned, only 4 weeks shut down instead of the original 5 weeks.
I’ve read a number of articles but not one of them has stated the number of Volts bought by General Electric in March, GE committed to buying 12,000 this year.
Government motors cannot be straight forward on anything regarding the Volt.
If any company wants to develope and sell EV’s, more power to them but it’s way past time for taxpayer grants, subsidies and tax credits to be supporting their private ventures.
Exactly, and it has got to come to an end.
I disagree with the program, but Nissan will pay back its loans. The article is trying to equate Nissan with Solyndra — it’s a bad analogy.
1.4 billion dollar loan for 1,300 jobs is a little over a million dollar government subsidy per job ($1,076,923). Nice work there Obama...
Soooo we backed both losers...
I believe you’re correct about Nissan paying back the loan and it was no doubt used as an incentive to Nissan to manufacture the Leaf here.
Taxpayers are still footing the bill for the Leaf $7,500 tax credit though, just as we are with the Volt, Tesla, etc.
When is this craziness going to stop? The CO2, global warming hoax has already been exposed. The purpose of the ongoing hoax is to ruin capitalism. We are being forced through our tax dollars to pay for our own destruction. Nobody is going to stop this madness?
I hear you -- and I want that credit abolished. I just thought the author took a cheap-and-easy shot by implying Nissan was a fly-by-night outfit. Your point would have made a much more solid article.
I saw a Nissan Leaf at a dealership. It’s cute. It’s probably the best looking $35,200 golf cart I’ve ever seen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.