Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/10/2012 9:56:10 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: xzins
I can hardly wait for Karl Rove's 1st Wednesday in March morning meeting when he tell us, "Get on board. Where are ya' gonna' go?"

FUBO, FUMR, FUKR, FURNC.

TS

2 posted on 04/10/2012 9:59:49 AM PDT by The Shrew (www.wintersoldier.com; www.tstrs.com; The Truth Shall Set You Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

So, what’s the alternative? Obama? Don’t think so.


3 posted on 04/10/2012 9:59:58 AM PDT by cblue55 (Mr. Obama, was your mother punished with a baby?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

WTF? I don’t like Romney at all, but there is no way in hell I oppose him if he becomes the nominee. That is suicide! We cannot survive 4 more years of Obama, but that is what what we will get if we keep pushing crap like this.
Obama must be defeated at all costs.


4 posted on 04/10/2012 10:00:15 AM PDT by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

The eventual GOP nominee will be running against a man who HATES white people, hates Christians, hates Jews, hates America and would love to destroy capitalism.
I will crawl to the voting booth to vote for whomever is running against Obama.


5 posted on 04/10/2012 10:00:41 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

If this Dumb A$$ party sends him to the General election, I WILL change to the Independent Party and waste my vote....hows that for being pissed off!!!


6 posted on 04/10/2012 10:01:36 AM PDT by MtnMan101 (THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIALISUM IS THAT YOU EVENTUALLY RUN OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

If this Dumb A$$ party sends him to the General election, I WILL change to the Independent Party and waste my vote....hows that for being pissed off!!!


7 posted on 04/10/2012 10:02:07 AM PDT by MtnMan101 (THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIALISUM IS THAT YOU EVENTUALLY RUN OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Because they’d rather watch Obama destroy America and then sit around reminding us “I told you so”.....


8 posted on 04/10/2012 10:02:16 AM PDT by G Larry (We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe; wmfights; Alamo-Girl; onyx; Cincinatus' Wife; darrellmaurina; Lancey Howard; ...

Ping for your input


9 posted on 04/10/2012 10:02:41 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

If Romney is the nominee, that will suck.

Because Romney sucks and Obama sucks.
I guess I’d have to either decide who sucks most...

OR.. if we’re being driven inevitably into a ditch, would it
perhaps be better to let the driver with the “D” after his
name be the one to do it? Or not?

Any way you look at it, opposition to WHOMEVER our nominee
is helps only Obama. There are no knights in shining armor
riding in to save the day at the last moment. You betcha.

Quite the conundrum.


10 posted on 04/10/2012 10:03:58 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
If conservatives accede to Romney's nomination, then all we will do is send a message to the GOP-E that we're not really serious about conservative principles, and that should there ever be a conservative upstart candidate again, then we will go right along with the personal destruction of that candidate, and all of the underhanded skullduggery that goes with it, that we saw on display in this primary season.

Further, a Romney presidency may even be WORSE than a second Obama term. At least with Obama in office, the Republicans have grown a little bit of a spinelet and fought him on some things, and really have served to hinder a lot of what Obama *could* have done. With Romney in office, it'll be 2000-2006 all over again - they will go right along with everything Romney proposes (which won't differ in substance, if only somewhat in degree), since he's "our" President. We could actually end up even DEEPER in socialism, debt, and trouble by the end of it all than with Obama.

12 posted on 04/10/2012 10:04:12 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
With respect, I would almost be willing to vote for Charlie Sheen before I would weaken the GOP candidate or throw the vote to Obama.

It's not what we want; but at least Romney loves this country and, as they say, "has already forgotten" more about its history than Obama will ever know.

13 posted on 04/10/2012 10:06:24 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Real men are not threatened by strong women." -- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

The only thing worse than a Mitt Romney presidency is an Obama Presidency. I’m not a Romney fan, but I’m not ready to commit haraki and hand Obama another four years.


15 posted on 04/10/2012 10:06:41 AM PDT by erod (This Chicagoan will crawl over broken glass to vote the fake Chicagoan Obama out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
The reelection of Obama will demoralize the Right.
The media will pound Congress, State Reps and the Governors with the theme “Conservatism is dead, Socialism WON!”

Symbolism is everything.
Perception is everything.

If Romney wins it will not be a Conservative victory. I think most conservatives get that.

However?

If Obama wins IT WILL BE A LIBERAL VICTORY!

And, more to the point, Obama wants to completely destroy the profit motive, making it very hard for Conservatism to finance itself.

We can live to fight another day, with Romney as President.

Obama might not let us live.

Financially, or literally.

17 posted on 04/10/2012 10:08:00 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I’ll spend my time opposing hussein instead. I hope that still makes me a conservative.


18 posted on 04/10/2012 10:08:58 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

If Obama win, Dems win the Senate and like the House also!


21 posted on 04/10/2012 10:11:10 AM PDT by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

There has to be a strategy that says ‘Vote for Mitt cause of the Supreme Court, but otherwise we oppose him’. And maybe I have just hit on it. Make this about voting for a Constitutionalist Supreme Court.

The GOPe must be made to pay dearly. They need to die, die, die. A bunch of crony capitalists.


22 posted on 04/10/2012 10:11:28 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I accept that Romney has no real political ideology beyond pragmatism. He governed as a moderate/liberal in MA because that’s what he ran as, and what the electorate of MA wanted. I expect he will govern as a moderate/conservative if elected, because that’s what he’s running as, and what the national electorare wants. Not my ideal, but way better than BHO.


25 posted on 04/10/2012 10:12:37 AM PDT by Hugin ("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Either this is a sick joke or you are working with the Obama Campaign. So you are willing to watch the destruction of our country continue with The Zero.


28 posted on 04/10/2012 10:14:29 AM PDT by DeweyShootem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I will be voting for Willard as the proverbial lesser of 2 evils - just like I did for McCain last time around. I expect that to be the case in most elections anyway. 2 party systems with no opportunity for coalition government means rarely will we have a candidate to be truly excited about. It is what it is.


30 posted on 04/10/2012 10:14:54 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

If Federal Court judges were elected to office and served for fixed terms, I’d agree. If congressional elections were held on a different day from presidential elections, thereby minimizing the down-ticket effects of a Democratic presidential victory, I’d agree. Since neither is the case, I think I’ll stick with whomever the GOP nominee is, even if it turns out to be Romney. He’s not ideal, but he’ll do. I don’t see how I can realistically expect perfection in a politician when 100m other people also have a say.


32 posted on 04/10/2012 10:15:05 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson