Posted on 04/10/2012 1:53:37 PM PDT by NJ_Tom
Exactly correct and people need to chill out.
Think about it.
The election for president isn’t one election—it’s 50 separate elections on the same day. Here in Alabama, our votes will be counted in this state, by Alabamians. In fact, each jurisdiction counts and tabulates their votes, makes the results PUBLIC, and the votes are sent to the county, which does the same. There’s no way in Hell, for example, that white conservative Alabamians are going to vote for Obama or his monstrous party. If we see that happening through tabulation fraud, we’ll be visitin’ the tabulators with more than pitchforks and torches....
Do what FReepers SHOULD do. Think about it—don’t fly off the handle.
And then when he's asked to put some ice on it, says, "How can I? I can't find my ice pick!" Reaches up, "Oh, here it is..."
Savage and Beck have been all over this
Who knows maybe there is something here,its defintely worth looking into.
The fact that each state uses its own system and operates according to its own laws would prevent a nationwide scheme to tamper with the 2012 vote. It is therefore impossible under the current system for the Obama Administration, for example, to implement a vote counting system for every precinct in America, although there are government officials who have made it known that they wish to mandate a uniform voting system that would be used in every state. At present, however, the various states and precincts are not capable of such a thing due to economic issues and other logistics.
Still and the same, yes, we need to be vigilant. As the article says, the best thing we should do is volunteer to be a pollwatcher and/or a precinct worker. I've done so, and it is a very interesting thing to do.
“it’s 50 separate elections on the same day.”
Fifty-one: the District of Colombia has two electors. No representation in House or Senate though - just a delegate, Holmes-Norton.
Thanks!
DC, eh? I’ll bet that vote is often up for grabs! /s
I totally agree buddy and am hardly out on a ledge.It is interesting however that there is a soros connection to this.
I don’t trust anything at all the regime does.
No kidding. Obviously this company in spain isn’t going to do what people think they are going to do, which is count all our votes and report a winner. The question is, just what it is that they ARE hired to do. I would like to know.
“DC, eh? I’ll bet that vote is often up for grabs! /s”
Yeah, it’s hotly contested... Obviously a contest the GOP should sink a lot of cash into.. /sarc.
Here is the link for the above.
http://dick-meom.blogspot.com/2012/05/estelle-stella-victoria-arrives.html
Because Alabama is NOT a voting jurisdiction. No one votes in Alabama generically. Everyone votes at their LOCAL precinct. The precincts PUBLISH their results before uploading/copying/phoning them in/what ever method to the state.
The state then reviews them and puts their de facto stamp of approval to the results. The state is using Scytl to do this review.
Still, if you follow the various precincts public vote tallies, you WILL know who won, and if an official count come out radically different, you’ll know the vote tabulation was tampered with.
Gotcha thanks,sounds like we should be pretty fool proof.
but thenthere is this.....
Bev Harris, an elections and voter fraud expert, wrote that the manner in which SCYTL reports election results are very hard to monitor for fraud. According to Harris, a citizen observer would have to be present at the time the polls close to capture evidence of precinct results. Otherwise there is no way to compare the numbers.
mark
The article is still there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.