Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graceless: Rick Santorum drops out but fails even to mention Mitt Romney
http://harndenblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/04/big-mistake-rick-santorum-drops-out-but-fails-even-to-men ^ | April 10, 2012 | Toby Harnden

Posted on 04/10/2012 6:29:52 PM PDT by samtheman

At one point, Santorum emphasised how important it was "that we win the House back and that we take the United States Senate", omitting the number one aspiration of Republicans across America - taking back the White House from Obama.

Santorum probably hasn't damaged Romney with his graceless speech today - but he has damaged himself. Having run a highly commendable race on a shoestring, he had an opportunity to lift himself straight away into the top ranks of his party's leadership with real prospects of victory in 2016 (if Romney loses in November) or even 2020.

But by making the speech all about him, rather than his country or his party, Santorum ended up looking like the smaller man.

(Excerpt) Read more at harndenblog.dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012election; election2012; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; newtgingrich; pennsylvania; ricksantorum; ricktheprick; romneysantorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Terry Mross

It’s not about Romney. It’s about how to get things done in the real world. Santorum has never understood that. He played the game of Wrecker in the primary, wrecking the one true conservative’s chance (Newt) and then goes out with a me-me-me-me speech.

Rick Huckabee Santorum all over again.


21 posted on 04/10/2012 6:40:13 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
But by making the speech all about him, rather than his country or his party, Santorum ended up looking like the smaller man.

The speech WAS about him. It was about him suspending his campaign. But that doesn't stop people like this writer from taking one last gratuitous cheap shot.

22 posted on 04/10/2012 6:40:39 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (There will be no vote for Myth Romney in my house. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike_9958

mikey, you talkin’ to yourself again.


23 posted on 04/10/2012 6:40:44 PM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Houghton M.

“I’d say you make yourself look bad”

I second that statement regarding this Romney shill. Screw Romney. Go Newt. Anything it takes to stop the CHARLATAN ROMNEY from 1144 delegates. The conservative vote is now united. Delegates UNITE!


24 posted on 04/10/2012 6:41:47 PM PDT by publius321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I am glad Rick did not pretend RINOmney has been honorable in this race - or worth of support.
I respect Santorum more because he didn’t bow the knee to the evil one.


25 posted on 04/10/2012 6:42:06 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldnÂ’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

What a pointless attack on Rick.


26 posted on 04/10/2012 6:42:25 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

romney is a disgrace, well said!


27 posted on 04/10/2012 6:42:34 PM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator; xzins

I agree. Why should he mention Romney? A candidate has a responsibility to address his supporters, not his opponents, especially a nasty one like Mitt. Anything he might have wanted to say goes without saying, and it’s better that way.


28 posted on 04/10/2012 6:42:50 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Quien vive? JESUS! Y a su nombre? GLORIA! Y a su pueblo? VICTORIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Toby Harnden from the Telegraph is pro=America, and I have read his articles since 2009 since he was one of the foreign media who questioned Odumbo’s socialist crap and the UK media until now is persona non grata with the WH.

However, I do question the cheap shot. Eventually, Rick will cool off for a bit and give Romney some props later which is the right thing to do.


29 posted on 04/10/2012 6:42:50 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

The exact opposite is the csse. Newt’s been a spoiler since Super Tuesday.

Take off your blinders. Newt will continue to fade. Deservedly.


30 posted on 04/10/2012 6:42:54 PM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DManA

It’s not hatred, though I do confess to a certain amount of bitterness. It’s the Huckabee phenomenon all over again and this time the Actor was Rick Santorum.

It’s like we never catch a break. We have our liberals, we have our conservatives, and then we have these Huckabee clowns who come in, stir up the muck, end up on the bottom with the liberal of the hour (McCain in ‘08 and Romney in ‘12) on top.

Maybe you’re right. Maybe it is hate. Now that I think of it.


31 posted on 04/10/2012 6:43:03 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Its going to be hard to support Newt if he’s anything like you
Go rot


32 posted on 04/10/2012 6:43:22 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

He’s not going to work for Obama, give me a break. I think that realistically, he’s finished, except as a possible Romney cabinet member.


33 posted on 04/10/2012 6:43:53 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Wrong. Mittens’ campaign has been the most “graceless” campaign I’ve ever seen. Mendacious negative ads are his trademark. Why should Santorum mention kindly that enabler of baby-killers, sodomites, the AGW hoax, and many other things dear to the hearts of leftists everywhere?


34 posted on 04/10/2012 6:44:08 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Rush liked his speech today.

Santorum is out. Leave him alone.

I guess we could say “now you don’t have him to kick around anymore”.

Who does that leave?


35 posted on 04/10/2012 6:44:21 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Santorum probably hasn't damaged Romney with his graceless speech today

What planet is this guy on??

36 posted on 04/10/2012 6:44:21 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Good grief....you RINOs are way too sensitive, The Kenyan and his media are going to have a ball slapping you around.


37 posted on 04/10/2012 6:44:49 PM PDT by roses of sharon ("Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius321

Actually, more like a Newt-shill. That’s the thing about the Newties. They invest far more energy into vitriol against everyone else, even after they’ve quit the race, than they do in positive plumping for their guy. That’s because their guy has faded even more than Santorum, he just won’t admit it.


38 posted on 04/10/2012 6:45:26 PM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Enter stage right... Sarah.


39 posted on 04/10/2012 6:49:23 PM PDT by txhurl (Thank you, Andrew Breitbart. In your untimely passing, you have exposed these people one last time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Houghton M.

Newt faded because Santorum ran interference using the same block of voters who Huckabee used in ‘08 to run interference for McCain.


40 posted on 04/10/2012 6:51:27 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson