Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Repeat After Me: The Identity Thief Is a Socialist
deathofthegrownup.com ^ | 04/13/2012 | Diana West

Posted on 04/14/2012 2:09:54 PM PDT by kreitzer

Now that Election 2012 is shaping up as a contest between President Obama and Mitt Romney, an observation and a prediction.

Our nation heads into a presidential campaign with an incumbent whose online birth certificate and Selective Service registration card are almost certainly forgeries, and this is a nonissue. (Don’t ask about the subpoena from a Georgia court that Obama ignored. Everyone else did, too.)

That’s the observation. The prediction is that unless voters come to view Barack Obama as a “socialist” – even a “democratic socialist” – and, as such, an existential threat to our (in theory) constitutional republic, President Obama, funny papers and all, will be re-elected in November.

The two stories are related. Both turn on the relative power of “evidence” vs. “narrative.” By evidence, I mean the facts and clues that support an argument or hypothesis. By narrative, I mean propaganda. For example, there is evidence of fraud in Obama’s identity documents, but such evidence does not fit the narrative that Obama’s identity documents are authentic. In the face of narrative, We the People are supposed to ignore the evidence. All of our officials and elites do.

Similarly, there is plentiful evidence of Barack Obama’s socialist beliefs and ties – Stanley Kurtz’s 2010 book “Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism” meticulously lays it out – but the narrative insists that Obama is anything but a socialist. And, as with the evidence of identity fraud, woe and besmirching to anyone who mentions it.

Now, what do I mean by socialism? Too often, and sometimes by design, defining socialism becomes an absurdly contentious exercise. If we narrowly define socialism as “government ownership of the means of production,” however, we’ll never know what hit us until it’s too late. I found it helpful to learn that Alexander Solzhenitsyn recognized there was no “single precise definition of socialism” out there. This is probably due to vagaries of time and place, and to the fact that, short of a violent revolution, socialism is a complex, messy work in progress. What’s vital to identify is the direction of that progress. If the progress tends toward increasing economic collectivism and political centralization, the movement is socialist. If the progress is in the other direction, the movement is known as capitalist.

By leaps of collectivism and bounds of centralization, Barack Obama has been taking the country in a socialist direction since he took office. I would add, however, that this is the direction the country has been moving since 1933. That’s another story.

But it’s all part of a story we’re not supposed to discuss in concrete terms. This must change this year, or else. Or else what? More and more socialism. That means less and less freedom.

On Oct. 12, 2008, Joe the Plumber – who, today, as Samuel Wurzelbacher is running for Congress – prompted candidate Obama to repeat the socialist mantra, in Obama’s words, that “when you spread the wealth around it’s good for everybody.” If you recall, this led to an intense, frenzied media vetting – of Joe the Plumber. Obama and his ties – for example, to the socialist New Party and the socialist front organization ACORN – went unreported in the print and television mainstream, even as new evidence was exploding like fireworks on mainly conservative Internet news sites and blogs, particularly in those final weeks of the campaign.

To date, Mitt Romney has balked at labeling President Obama or even his policies as socialist, probably calculating that the label distracts from his arguments. I implore him to reconsider lest Obama’s and the Democrats’ stealth socialism finish off the country once and for all.

What’s fascinating, meanwhile, is that Obama is underscoring his own socialism by disavowing it – even as no one in the political arena is accusing him of it. Psychologists probably would call this phenomenon “projection.”

Joel Gehrke of the Washington Examiner noted that twice last week Obama defended his economic ideas against charges of socialism – charges no one is actually making. This week, Gehrke picked up on the president’s stated denial that he is trying to “redistribute wealth,” even as Obama touted a plan to do exactly that with the “Buffett Rule.” This rule, as Obama explained to Joe the Plumber back in 2008, “spreads the wealth around” by taxing millionaires at a higher rate to pay for “investments” (a deceptive word for government programs). These “investments,” Obama told a Florida audience, “haven’t been made as some grand scheme to redistribute wealth from one group to another. This is not some socialist dream.”

That’s the narrative, of course. Who really believes it’s supported by the facts?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/14/2012 2:09:57 PM PDT by kreitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kreitzer

It’s not a socialist dream it’s a free man’s
nightmare.


2 posted on 04/14/2012 2:17:26 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kreitzer

Romney the Ineligible RINO is also a socialist.

Like Obama, Romney is FOR Socialized Medicine.


3 posted on 04/14/2012 2:21:04 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kreitzer
On a side note ... just had a phone call (probably a scam). Person claimed to be with the U.S. Census Department. First question involved my phone number to verify. At that point told the person on the other end of the phone that was not going to answer questions over the phone ... Snail Mail me and hung up. Bet nothing arrives in the mail. Would recommend anyone receiving this type of call to act accordingly.
4 posted on 04/14/2012 2:21:23 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kreitzer

Øbama has the Zombie vote. A Zombie never heard of socialism. Lots of luck.


5 posted on 04/14/2012 2:25:41 PM PDT by Misterioso ( The difference between stupidity and intelligence is that intelligence has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller

“Romney the Ineligible RINO is also a socialist. Like Obama, Romney is FOR Socialized Medicine.”

See?


6 posted on 04/14/2012 2:26:46 PM PDT by Magic Fingers (Political correctness mutates in order to remain virulent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kreitzer
The tragedy for America is that no one with influence, including Mitt Romney, will say that the 'emperor has no clothes' - that Obama is a hardcore socialist that fully intends to 'transform' America into a socialist nation and that by doing so, he'll effectively destroy it.

The November election is America's last chance to stop the long slide toward socialism. Unfortunately, the guy we're going to depend on to stop the slide, Mitt Romney, is probably not up to the job. We'll see.

7 posted on 04/14/2012 2:27:01 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kreitzer

Of course it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIw5_a_jI0o


8 posted on 04/14/2012 2:29:16 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68; Fred Nerks; Beckwith

It’s not a socialist dream it’s a free man’s
nightmare.>>>>>>>>>>>

Agreed! Hey look, the GOP RINO faction thinks it is business as usual with Obama. They ignore the fact that Obama is a nationalist socialist. The nationalist aspect is based on the Black Nation views of liberation theology that Obama heard preached from the pulp[it of Rev. Ralph Wright for over 20 years.That is the nationalist aspect of Obama.

The Socialist aspect is that Obama is clearly by his conduct , against the investor class , or against the middle class. In his policies and conduct he is willing to sacrifice our “best in the world” health care system for the benefit of 3 million uninsured Americans, 1. 5 million are young people under 26 and the other 1.5 million are illegal aliens. The US system works for 360 million minus 3 million = 357 million Americans. And Obama is willing to force Americans using $10,000 fines for not buying Government “Health Insurance” and will use the extraordinary seizure powers of thwe IRS to acomplish that.This is but one example of Obama socialism , redistribution of wealth. It is clearly visible through his energy, and inductrial union policies also. Obama gives not a fig for small businesses and entrepreneurs.He wants Americans dependent on government, and subject to his growing totalitarian authority so he can achieve his fascist Utopia.Obama is not satisfied with the People having individual freedoms and choices so as to define for themselves how they want to live.

Now take Obama’s nationalism and socialism , put them together and HISTORY says you have , guess what?

FASCISM.

And NOT ONE GOP RINO Congressman or Senator is willing to take the position of defining what HISTORY itself says Obama IS.......A FASCIST ! Without that definition Obama WILL NOT be defeated at the polls. It will be necessary to defeat him and his supporters through force majeur , as History shows is necessary for ALL fascist movements that attain political power.

Once fascists are elected, HISTORY says you can’t get rid of them at the polls unless they exposed, truth told, and ridicule of them applied by a free people.

As this article says, so far America has its head in the sand with its ass high up in the air waiting for incoming.

This is a GOOD read:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html


9 posted on 04/14/2012 2:38:20 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascist info....http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

As Hayek points out in “The Road To Serfdom,” Fascism is what you get when socialists lose their illusion. A number of intellectuals at the time, 1930s and 40s, realized there was no difference between Stalin and Hitler, and if they were alive today, they would recognize Obama as someone who belongs on that short list.


10 posted on 04/14/2012 3:10:08 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers
I suspected you were observing, much like myself. This one's a particularly good one !

I'm praying our Romney haters live in states where it won't make any difference. I appreciate their sentiments, but we'll have to change the party from within the halls of Congress, or concede to socialism. One more progressive on the court and we're screwed for the rest of our lifetimes.

I know of no one who's left the TEA Party. With Obie's abysmal record, and transparent desperation, we should clean house like '10.

It's also occurred to me that Rick and Newt were more vunerable to Obie's tactics. He has traditionally eliminated his competition with dirt. In the state legislature (Bobby Weed I believe), in the Senate (Jack Ryan). He didn't quite eliminate Hillary, as much as beat her, but he had to use racism and white guilt to do it. The race card won't work a second time, not with Eric Holder and Sharpton on the front pages creating race wars. It won't be tolerated.

Whereas, Mitt and Ann look squeaky clean. They'll be hard to eliminate. It's not a good criteria for choosing candidates, I admit, but it'll be reality and a positive if Romney is the nominee. TAGLINE

11 posted on 04/14/2012 3:16:39 PM PDT by chiller (Elect another batch of TPartiers and it won't matter which R we elect. WE will lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chiller

10-4 re your tagline!


12 posted on 04/14/2012 3:23:48 PM PDT by Magic Fingers (Political correctness mutates in order to remain virulent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kreitzer

A true socialist would have created millions of public works jobs thru infrastructure projects. That didn’t happen.

Instead, the Rats spent the Stimulus on themselves; paying off cronies with Green project loans & grants that were purely scam opperations to steal Federal dollars. Part of this money will go back to Obama to help his reelection, so that the theft can continue 4 more years.

To call these crooks socialists is to give them credit where none is due.


13 posted on 04/14/2012 3:37:09 PM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da
A true socialist would have created millions of public works jobs thru infrastructure projects. That didn’t happen.

Silly boy, Obama used the money to pay people who were already in public sector jobs.
14 posted on 04/14/2012 3:40:25 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kreitzer

Nice article(s) meaning the reason for thread and a few very nice posts. Lot of work to do.


15 posted on 04/14/2012 3:51:56 PM PDT by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28, Romans 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kreitzer

excellent article


16 posted on 04/14/2012 4:10:16 PM PDT by jdirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Click!

17 posted on 04/14/2012 5:08:29 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson