Skip to comments.Obama Exec Order Takes Natural Gas Away From States
Posted on 04/16/2012 7:05:51 AM PDT by TexasVoter
click here to read article
What a defeatist attitude !
(2) an evaluation of key factors
The key factor limiting production is political stalling of supporting infrastructure.
The the politicians out of the way and more oil will from in the US.
Executive Order: Feds To Take Control of Domestic Natural Gas Production; EPA Set To Move Within One Week
Needs to be shouted from the rooftops.
Every time I heard the fuss about the secret service, I wondered what we were being distracted from. I wondered how much more of our sovereignty was being given away to south america. This answers my question. Natural gas does not cost enough.
“Because natural gas produced 25 percent of our energy in 2011, the federal government must control this source of energy in order to deliver on the promise of making gasoline prices rise to $10 per gallon, bankrupt the coal industry, and cause energy prices to skyrocket. “
Good to see folks catching on to that.
I have been posting the following. Perhaps now that it is Monday it will get traction.
As near as I can tell, little bammy wants to destroy it.
Right from the White House itself.
The Interagency Working Group to Support Safe and Responsible Development of Unconventional Domestic Natural Gas Resources will be chaired by the Director of the Domestic Policy Council
Oh yeah, you guessed it, here it comes...
Director of Domestic Policy Council Cecilia Muñoz
Cecilia Muñoz is the Presidents Domestic Policy Advisor and the Director of the Domestic Policy Council, which coordinates the domestic policy-making process in the White House. Previously, Ms. Muñoz served as Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Intergovernmental Affairs.
Prior to joining the Obama Administration, Cecilia served as Senior Vice-President for the Office of Research, Advocacy, and Legislation at the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), the nations largest Latino civil rights organization. She supervised NCLRs policy staff covering a variety of issues of importance to Latinos, including civil rights, employment, poverty, farmworker issues, education, health, housing, and immigration. Her particular area of expertise is immigration policy, which she covered at NCLR for twenty years.
Ms. Muñoz is the former Chair of the Board of Center for Community Change, and served on the U.S. Programs Board of the Open Society Institute and the Board of Directors of the Atlantic Philanthropies and the National Immigration Forum.
Ms. Muñoz is the daughter of immigrants from Bolivia and was born in Detroit, Michigan. She received her undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and her masters degree from the University of California at Berkeley. In June 2000, she was awarded a MacArthur Foundation fellowship in recognition of her work on immigration and civil rights. In 2007, she served as the Towsley Foundation Policymaker in Residence at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. She has received numerous other awards and recognitions from various sources, including the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, and a variety of local non-profit organizations.
So... what the ???
I do not see a single item that is any indication whatsoever that she should have ANY input into the management and regulation of the u.S. natural gas industry.
She is pretty much a race pimptress for LaRaza and apparently never had never had a job outside of government (taxpayer) funded "affirmative action" giveaway programs.
So, OF COURSE she will be put in charge of all policy decisions of the entire u.S. natural gas industry.
Ms. I don’t know what an MMBtu is Monoz is going to tell the “unconventional” Nat Gas business how to do its business. How nice.
Okay then, what are your grounds for impeachment? Please be specific as to how these charges can be:
1. Proven, and
2. rise to the level of high crime and misdemeanor.
Okay then, what are your grounds for impeachment? Please be specific as to how these charges can be: 1. Proven, and 2. rise to the level of high crime and misdemeanor.
If you don't start on your journey,
Have a wonderful journey with unicorns and pixie dust.
you will never arrive at any destination. Grasshopper.
If you don't start on your journey,
I ask you to actually back up your desire to impeach Obama with at least the grounds for impeachment and you claim that I live in fantasy land? WOW - thats a mojo portion of projection you got goin’ there.
But, okay - lets all call our spineless wonders in DC and demand that they start impeachment proceedings against Obama, because, well .... we’ll pencil that part in later [they’ll have to pass it to know whats in it] - just get that Scarlet “I” ready to sew on Obama’s jacket. Meanwhile, our friends in the media will fully support our efforts by pointing out how non-partisan our actions are. Even the Democrats will conceed that we are acting in the best interest of the country and not stand in our way.
With luck, we’ll have it all sewn up be Election Day and the media will berate The Impeached One mercilessly until he finally withdraws from the election in disgrace.
And? What high crime / misdemeanor are you going to “charge” him with?
The islands were never part of the US.
The same claim was made up against Bush.
Romney is a pathological compulsive liar. Lie after lie papered over with more lies. Doesnt even flinch when caught in bald faced lies, simply tells another big whopper to cover up or dodge the issue.
He cannot lie his way out of his decades long record of support for abortion, Roe v Wade, planned parenthood, gay rights, gun control, global warming, amnesty, liberal judges, big government, compulsory or socialized health care (RomneyCommieCare), mandates, Keynesian economics, support and approval of TARP, bailouts, stimulus packages, i.e, every damn liberal progressive issue that comes down the pike.
Yep, Reagan was once a Democrat. I don't think he was ever like that though.
So many things to choose from and you pick one that is completely bogus.
The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. The Tenth Amendment states the Constitution's principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the federal government nor prohibited to the States by the Constitution are reserved to the States or the people.
That’s nice. What does that have to do with the fact that the U.S. has never made any claim to those islands?
The liberals tried to make this fake claim against President Bush. The myth became so common back in 2003 the State Department reaffirmed the border in writing trying to dispel this myth.
Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs
May 20, 2003
Status of Wrangel and Other Arctic Islands
No negotiations regarding the U.S.-Russia maritime boundary have occurred since 1990, when the U.S.-USSR Maritime Boundary Agreement was signed. The negotiations that led to that agreement did not address the status of Wrangel Island, Herald Island, Bennett Island, Jeannette Island, or Henrietta Island, all of which lie off Russia’s Arctic coast, or Mednyy (Copper) Island or rocks off the coast of Mednyy Island in the Bering Sea. None of the islands or rocks above were included in the U.S. purchase of Alaska from Russia in 1867, and they have never been claimed by the United States, although Americans were involved in the discovery and exploration of some of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.