Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is GOP fear of race riots stopping any real investigation into Obama’s past
coachisright.com ^ | April 17, 2012 | George Spelvin, staff writer

Posted on 04/17/2012 1:30:17 PM PDT by jmaroneps37

By Congress is refusing to act on citizen demands for an investigation of Barack Obama’s Natural Born Citizenship status because of fears of race riots by Blacks across America.

This appears to be the consensus arrived at by many of our country’s on line bloggers. “Obama’s failure to come up with a real, long form Birth Certificate in a timely manner and his expenditure of a vast amount of money in legal fees in my opinion is a 100% indication something is rotten in Denmark. I don’t know what that something is, but something is fishy,” states one commenter.

Another asks, “Why would Obama spend so much money when all he has to do is show his BC? . .think about it. . .he can’t show it because if he does, it’ll admit it’s fake” says another blogger.

World Net Daily is reporting that members of Congress were even given talking points by their own Congressional Research Agency to head off complaints of American citizens. A WND writer is reporting that some elected officials appeared to mouth these talking points verbatim!

Unable or unwilling to either think or act on their own, such is the control being exhibited on them from the top of the GOP leadership. Our elected officials continue to stonewall America’s citizens.

Now while Congress, our courts, our media and governmental agencies continue in “ protect and conceal” mode only one law enforcement officer Sheriff Joe Arpaio is continuing his battle to bring out the truth about Barack Obama.

Arpaio tells his interviewers over and over he expressly told his Cold Case Posse of volunteer law men and attorneys to clear the President, to put this issue to rest, to find out his documents. But the mountains of evidence they uncovered…..

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: blackkk; florida; georgezimmerman; obamasbirth; trayvonmartin
This could nail Obama to the floor.
1 posted on 04/17/2012 1:30:29 PM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The answer is YES!!


2 posted on 04/17/2012 1:32:06 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Yes, that is the correct answer along with they are terrified about a black back lash which they have no reason to fear inasmuch as most blacks are dems anyway.


3 posted on 04/17/2012 1:35:23 PM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Obama’s failure to come up with a real, long form Birth Certificate in a timely manner and his expenditure of a vast amount of money in legal fees in my opinion is a 100% indication something is rotten in Denmark.

In legalese I think they would call it Prima facia evidence.


4 posted on 04/17/2012 1:36:47 PM PDT by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

“Is GOP fear of race riots stopping any real investigation into Obama’s past”

DUH....


5 posted on 04/17/2012 1:39:05 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Absolutely. Keeping the blacks leashed, but straining at their tethers is something the elites can use to scare the white people into submission and justify the communist takeover. If they break their leash and have to be put down, they’re going way down and the leftist dream dies that day because we aren’t putting the cap back on the powder horn until we’re done fixing America. They’re saving the black uprising for the endgame when they need to finally implement martial law and suspend the Constitution.


6 posted on 04/17/2012 1:39:57 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Obama’s failure to come up with a real, long form Birth Certificate in a timely manner and his expenditure of a vast amount of money in legal fees in my opinion is a 100% indication something is rotten in Denmark.

In legalese I think they would call it Prima facia evidence.

The correct spelling should have been Prima Facie.


7 posted on 04/17/2012 1:40:18 PM PDT by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Its one of the reasons I doubt they have any intent of taking the white house.


8 posted on 04/17/2012 1:42:21 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Fear of the Rabble Rousers. Still it is beyond disgusting!


9 posted on 04/17/2012 1:46:04 PM PDT by Why So Serious (There is no cure for stupidity!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Here in Florida we have the Castle law. Good luck with that little riot shit in my neigborhood.
As for N.Y. City, Chicago, etc where the only folks with guns are criminals and cops. Good luck with that.


10 posted on 04/17/2012 1:49:24 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

As long as the GOP is afraid to get involved in the eligibility issue, it lowers its credibility with the voters and Obama will go scot free.


11 posted on 04/17/2012 1:51:09 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

With the former being a very expensive (”prima”) treatment for the exterior of one’s house (”facia”)?


12 posted on 04/17/2012 1:52:41 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

This has been my belief all along.


13 posted on 04/17/2012 1:55:51 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

We’ve had race riots in this country before and survived them. We’ve never had a manchurian candidate president before and it sure looks like we won’t survive him/it. Simple logic would dictate to take the chances on the race riots. And the riots are not even a sure bet to occur.


14 posted on 04/17/2012 1:56:11 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The underlying threat of riots will be used in the attempt to reelect Obama as well. It will be interesting to see how they go about it.


15 posted on 04/17/2012 1:58:58 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Here in Florida we have the Castle law.

Same here in Michigan. Funny thing you never hear much about the black on black defensive shootings that happen at an increasing rate in Detroit.
16 posted on 04/17/2012 2:00:40 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
The answer is an unequivocal yes. I came to that conclusion in 2008 when questions were raised that the obama campaign never even bothered to answer and when John McCain absolutely refused to attack obama on anything.

FWIW I think there'll be riots this summer because they'll let obammy look strong and seeing rioters and looters in the streets will be thought to be enough to keep the white majority sufficiently cowed to allow obammy to steal the election. And if by some chance obammy isn't reelected we'll have more riots. And when the Zimmerman case is thrown out we'll have riots and if his case goes to trial and he wins we'll have riots...and if he loses we'll have celebratory riots...kinda like when you win a big basketball game.

It's going to be a long hot summer.

17 posted on 04/17/2012 2:08:31 PM PDT by pgkdan (Rick Santorum 2012. Conservative's last, best chance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Yes. Or they are being blackmailed with something far worse.


18 posted on 04/17/2012 2:12:23 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The GOP has been infected with progressive cancer and are only a few degrees of difference with the communist party (aka democrats).

My contention has been, no matter what Mubumble Odumbo does, nobody from any party in this government will go after him and put him in jail for committing fraud.

We do not have any government entity, media, large civilian force which can put this maggot on trial. The ruling elite are all part of the same club and this left right nonsense is just a distraction to make us think the ballot box still works.

The ballot box no longer works when there is collusion between the 2 major parties.

Thomas Jefferson knew this COULD happen and told us what to do. There are only ~~530+ of them by the way.


19 posted on 04/17/2012 2:18:48 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

No...

It is WISDOM, born of experience with maintaining credibility across the broad spectrum.

When you maintain your critical focus on policy and policy failures, there is no basis for objective observers to question the motives, of your assessment.

There is no mechanism to effectively and realistically make any difference in Obama’s tenure, by pursuing other than policy failures.

I personally believe Obama wants to destroy America.
But, pretending the ability to get inside his head, and convince others “why” he wants to do that, is a fool’s errand.


20 posted on 04/17/2012 2:20:41 PM PDT by G Larry (We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

The GOP seems to prefer the total destruction of the country, by the re-election of Obama, over race riots in the streets?

Sheesh, what a choice.


21 posted on 04/17/2012 2:24:11 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Or they are being blackmailed with something far worse

I believe that you have the right of it.

22 posted on 04/17/2012 2:24:24 PM PDT by Noumenon ("I tell you, gentlemen, we have a problem on our hands." Col. Nicholson-The Bridge on the River Qwai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The GOP has been generally spineless for years.


23 posted on 04/17/2012 2:31:19 PM PDT by mykroar (A vote for Romney IS a vote for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
Congress doesn't like to overturn the results of elections.

Not only would it polarize the country, but the votes won't be there to remove a sitting president.

And after three years with an election coming up this year, there's not going to be support in Washington for what would look like an act of desperation or vindictiveness.

No need to racialize the conflict: it has to do with parties and ideologies.

If you would react against Congress overturning an election that went in your favor, you ought to understand that it's a two-way street.

If you object to liberals dismissing your views by pretending it's "all about race" why would you mischaracterize other people's views in the same way?

Finally, if you have the evidence, you could force the politicians' hand to get hearings, but it looks like the hard evidence just isn't there.

24 posted on 04/17/2012 2:33:50 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
No it's not fear of race riots. That may be a factor but I don't think that's the reason for both parties to ignore the obvious.

I have thought long and hard for an explanation as to why elected officials (some of which are honest men) would apparently ignore their oaths of office.

I have come to the conclusion that the reason lies with with the credibility of the United States of America. Both parties have agreed in silent at the highest level to never reveal the truth that Obama is ineligible. If we reveal to the world that the American People let a completely unvetted and ineligible man into the oval office we would NEVER regain credibility as a nation throughout the entire globe. No one would EVER truly trust the US again, and for good reason.

So in reality these congressmen ARE abiding by their oaths of office to protect and defend the constitution since revealing the truth behind Obama would in fact undermine the sovereignty and security of the United States forever.

The congress realizes we can never admit to the world we (the American People) let a man who we knew nothing of his actual past take control of a nuclear arsenal that could in theory wipe out everyone on the globe.

After at least two years of trying to come up with an explanation, this is the ONLY theory that makes sense to me. It's also the ONLY theory which would make sense to me if I myself were a member of congress.

25 posted on 04/17/2012 2:35:35 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

cripplecreek,
You EVER go to Detroit?
I did as a small kid to watch Rocky Colovito, Norm Cash, Al Kaline, Jake Woods play a game or two with my dad.
Wouldn’t go ther today on a bet.
did go snowmobiling in Houghton last year drove ALL OVE your most beautiful state. But detroit?


26 posted on 04/17/2012 2:49:13 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

The fact that Clinton skated on his crimes, and Bush did nothing about it when he was in charge, speaks volumes to this current situation.

People have to stop even saying “two-party” system, and accept the fact we are ruled by a republicrat oligarchy.

The Going On Progressive party has pushed their establishment hack upon us for two POTUS election years now.

This is fascism, NOT freedom.


27 posted on 04/17/2012 3:09:32 PM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

Agree completely that it’s not the fear of riots. Heck, we’ve got that now (the fear, that is). It’s a combination of fears and prejudices and “gentlemanly” conduct. Remember McCain? How many opportunities to discredit Obama did he waste? What happens to Rubio’s chances for a presidential run if Obama’s declared other than a natural-born citizen? And, of course, on a par with race-riots is race-baiting. What pubbie wants a bigger racist label than he already has? Lastly, it’s too late; the die was cast by cowards and “patriots” in ‘08.


28 posted on 04/17/2012 3:11:39 PM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

If I go to Detroit its right downtown to Comerica Park and that’s not bad if you don’t wander away from the stadium. Justin Verlander will be joining the names you mentioned.


29 posted on 04/17/2012 3:22:18 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
It's going to be a long hot summer.

Time to invest in ammo and body armor.

30 posted on 04/17/2012 3:22:27 PM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

It’s a damn shame there are no Senators from either party willing to put their country before obama.


31 posted on 04/17/2012 3:26:43 PM PDT by jersey117 (The Stepford Media should be sued for malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe

It’s we the people’s fault too. Why aren’t we marching on Washington demanding answers. And I don’t mean as a tea party to be demonized by the left and the media. Just regular fed up folks sick over what’s happening to our country. Its easy to sit behind a keyboard and complain. We need to get out there like Nugent did and get angry and make our voices heard. Demand that obama price his eligibility.


32 posted on 04/17/2012 3:36:47 PM PDT by jersey117 (The Stepford Media should be sued for malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

The dumb ones will go off their nut regardless.There are not nearly enough of them to make any real difference.They can burn down their own neighborhoods as they have in the past.When they try to burn down ours is when the sh!t hits the fan.


33 posted on 04/17/2012 3:40:55 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

“It’s we the people’s fault too.”

I agree, but the propaganda ministry will demonize anyone not towing the party line.

It’s just like the third reich or the book 1984.

Too many people lack the passion for real truth.

Glenn Beck has the right idea spending his money to create an honest media alternative.

But, if someone found a REAL Kenyan BC for Obama, it would be blasted as fake and most voters would just move on.

Would that make the freepers here who have sworn not to vote for Romney change their mind?


34 posted on 04/17/2012 4:23:58 PM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe

Hey this is free republic.This is a CONSERVATIVE site.Why do you promote the white version of obamster on this site?


35 posted on 04/17/2012 4:27:11 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Here’s news that everyone can use.

They are going to riot any damn way. Over Obama, over Trayvon, over something, but it will happen anyway and frankly I am beyond sick of the nation being held hostage.


36 posted on 04/17/2012 6:29:50 PM PDT by Molon Labbie (A Bounty on Zimmerman, Can Be A Bounty On ANYONE. No NBPP Mob Justice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
"So in reality these congressmen ARE abiding by their oaths of office to protect and defend the constitution since revealing the truth behind Obama would in fact undermine the sovereignty and security of the United States forever."

In reality, there is an oath to support the Constitution in Article Six that all congressmen and senators take when entering office.

Part of that Constitution, The Twentieth Amendment, Section 3 requires that they, Congress, ensure that the President elect shall have qualified or they, Congress are to name an interim President. Here's the text itself.:

"3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified."

A few notes.

1. There is no such position as a "President elect", legally, until such a time as Congress has accepted the results of the electoral college votes and a person is actually named as the "President elect". This means that the term "shall have qualified" refers to something other than the results of winning an election. There is only one place left in the Constitution having to do with "qualifications" for the office of President, that being the eligibility requirements from Article two.

"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

2. Since it is the duty of Congress to name an interim President in the event of a President elect's "failure to qualify", they, Congress, must know whether or not to do so. This means that they, Congress, must be aware of whether or not a President elect meets the eligibility requirements from Article two. It is the burden of the President elect to "qualify" or "fail to qualify", thus not proving one is eligible under Article Two to Congress is the same thing as failing to qualify.

3. How was Obama's eligibility proven to Congress without a valid long form birth certificate? He apparently does not possess such a thing or we would have seen it a million times by now.

4. The eligibility requirements start out with two simple words which forever preclude anyone who "fails to qualify" from serving as a legal president, "No person". Someone who sneaks in because Congress failed to uphold it's responsibility to enforce the Twentieth Amendment, section 3 doesn't legally exist. The Constitution cannot be fooled just because Congress didn't act when it was supposed to. A President elect either qualifies or he cannot ever be President, period.

What we have is a Congress that did not uphold it's oath to support the Constitution and a usurpation of the office of President is the result.

There is a credibility problem alright, one of this government with it's own citizens.

37 posted on 04/17/2012 8:14:44 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
I made no attempt to point blame as to WHY Obama was allowed to take the oath of office. The fact remains no one stopped the process and he was sworn in as president.

The question we are all trying to answer is why all of our elected officials ignore the now obvious fact that Obama is ineligible.

The answer is simple. We can't undo what has been done. If we tell the world we ignored the safeguards of our own constitution and put a man in charge of a nuclear arsenal powerful enough to kill everyone on earth we as a nation will NEVER recover as the accepted leaders of the free world. How could we justify being the most militarily powerful nation on earth if we don't even bother to make sure the man in charge is legitimate? The entire globe would turn against the U.S.

So our congressional leaders are well aware that we've made a terrible mistake as a nation but we must maintain plausible deniability to the world.

As much as I want to see Obama removed from office I am confident it will never happen for the reason I've outlined. No court case will ever get off the ground. No conclusive evidence of ineligibility will ever be found.

The powers that be will make certain this issue remains just a conspiracy theory. I would also add this is most likely the correct course of action for our country.

38 posted on 04/17/2012 11:55:17 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

Interesting take on this.


39 posted on 04/18/2012 12:19:33 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Too many people are being paid a visit by the Fed sponsored Communist Party welcome wagon crews.

People who investigate Obama are being assassinated.

And even suggesting that people could be in grave danger questioning Obama will get laughs and sneers from any law enforcement agency.

Quite frankly I say its time to buy home improvement implements. Or for the stupid people manual manure spreaders.


40 posted on 04/18/2012 12:26:26 AM PDT by Eye of Unk (Liberals need not reply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

As a 6 year old I lived in Walled Lake and I went to several games back when it was Jake Woods, Rocky Colivito, Norm Cash and Al Kaline.
Sure did hate them damn Yankees back then. Cept for the Mick.


41 posted on 04/18/2012 3:23:37 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
"The powers that be will make certain this issue remains just a conspiracy theory. I would also add this is most likely the correct course of action for our country."

There is no "conspiracy" theory. There are only the cold hard FACTS that I cited to you. The awareness of ineligibility is already KNOWN by everyone on Earth. They are now equally aware that the United States government does not hold itself accountable to the very document from which it assumes it's powers. They are all equally aware that the United States government considers itself unaccountable to the citizens it supposedly represents. Your attempt at putting make-up over such an ugly face is laughable.

You talk about the answer being "simple". It is. Currently, there is an out of control, outlaw government acting as though it is legitimate, fronting for a person who is not a President while the entire world watches. The trust factor for this government is at ZERO. Allowing this charade to continue is anything but the correct course of action for this nation.

42 posted on 04/18/2012 5:43:26 AM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

I have said on other threads that the GOP forcing Romney on us is fascism, and voting for him is “bending over” for it.

I was trying to make a point that just making our “voices heard” is futile, considering the power of the media.

I feel that truth loving conservatives outnumber the die hard Marxist left wing nuts, but the voting masses of sheeple are just too intellectually lazy.

Everyone in my circles wanted George W. Bush to be President.

I have not met one single person that wanted McCain or Romney, so just how did the Going On Progressive party dump those assclowns on us anyway?


43 posted on 04/18/2012 6:45:26 AM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
Sorry, but you've missed the point completely. Please reread my post again if you want to understand the reason why there is no action from our congressional leaders.

Obama IS ineligible however there is a big difference between what is going on now and what would be the impact on the nation if congress were to officially tell the world of our mistake.

At this point we can pass the problem off as unproven conspiracy theory and retain plausible deniabillity.

If congress acts and we remove Obama from office we PROVE TO THE WORLD, the United States is an incompetent, negligent danger to everyone on earth.

I thought I was clear but you still missed the point somehow.

I am convinced this remains the only logical reason and the only possible legitimate reason to let Obama serve out his presidency.

44 posted on 04/18/2012 7:07:49 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
"If congress acts and we remove Obama from office we PROVE TO THE WORLD, the United States is an incompetent, negligent danger to everyone on earth."

Congress does not own the truth and your claims that somehow they can manipulate it to somehow save face for this country is ridiculous. The truth is what it is. The truth is that the entire rest of the world KNOWS this country has no legal President. They also know that Congress is too much of a chicken to address it. This does not portray strength, it portrays cowardice and weakness.

You seem more concerned about how the world views our country than about the extreme damage done to MILLIONS of your fellow Americans due to what has and is occurring. They are the ones who Congress is supposed to worry about.

"I am convinced this remains the only logical reason and the only possible legitimate reason to let Obama serve out his presidency."

Your reason is not logical because it denies that which is true in the real world. You say yourself that we have someone who is ineligible but somehow think the rest of the world can't figure this out. They sure can figure out one thing. Blackmail. Where is this in your dreamland scenario?

Now, there is one potential reason for what is transpiring that even I could possibly support. Think a little harder and perhaps you can figure it out.

45 posted on 04/18/2012 4:45:04 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
"Now, there is one potential reason for what is transpiring that even I could possibly support. Think a little harder and perhaps you can figure it out. "

Just lay it out there, I will listen to anything that may be new or that I have not considered.

I will add that if you don't agree with my assessment that's fine. I'm not trying to convince anyone or win anyone over but I've put a lot of thought into this issue. I simply offer this explanation to try to explain why this is happening.

Also the depth of the problem faced by the US with the ineligibility of a sitting president can't be addressed in a simple thread like this. This is a lot more complex than I care to write about in this thread.

Bottom line: The only sure resolution to Obama is to simply move on and get a new president at this election or the next. Official hearings proving Obama is ineligible after three years of his term is something we simply have no answer for as a nation. There is no blueprint to fall back on. The founding documents simply don't address this problem in any way. The result of official action would almost certainly be catastrophic for the United States.

46 posted on 04/18/2012 10:21:24 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
"Official hearings proving Obama is ineligible after three years of his term is something we simply have no answer for as a nation. There is no blueprint to fall back on. The founding documents simply don't address this problem in any way. The result of official action would almost certainly be catastrophic for the United States."

Official hearings proving him ineligible get him arrested right away. If he is not legally President, the Constitutional remedy for removing such does not apply. You cannot impeach a non-President.

The Twentieth Amendment addresses this but has not been utilized either through intimidation or cowardice on the part of ALL members of Congress.

These past three years have been as catastrophic as you can be to millions, MILLIONS, of your fellow citizens who have endured losing jobs, their life savings, and their homes.

Now, why would Congress sit back and do nothing as this all takes place to their constituents? This is easy to answer for the Democrats, but why would the entire Republican power structure on Capitol Hill let this occur? There are two directions to take this.

One, they are complicit, know it, and are scared to death that the American people will hold them accountable for what they have allowed to happen. They should be scared as there will be no mercy when the truth is acknowledged and the raw anger of the electorate takes over. Throughout this nations history, thousands of young men in the prime of life gave their lives for the sake of our freedoms yet these cowards weren't brave enough to ask for a legitimate birth certificate? Sorry, Congress, if they are discovered to be part of this charade, they deserve whatever the people give them in return.

Two, the other direction, perhaps a costly one to the nation at first, but worth the short term sacrifice if it brings us back in the direction of the Founders. If there is no question that Obama is ineligible to serve as President, the democrats and their Communist/Marxist friends have made a fatal error. If Congress held hearings proving this case after Obama's supposed term is up, everything he signed into law is wiped off the slate, INCLUDING his Supreme Court appointments.

If the Republicans take control of both houses of Congress and the White House, it would be game, set, and match for the progressive agenda for a long, long time in this nation. Imagine the impact of a 7 to 2 conservative-leaning and Constitution-enforcing advantage on the Supreme Court. How long would this have taken to occur, if at all, in our lifetimes? Perhaps never before in this nations history has our Congress had the chance to turn back the clock on what leftist have made of it. Is this what their objective is? They had better hope that it is.

47 posted on 04/19/2012 5:05:22 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

I WOULD RATHER HAVE RACE RIOTS NOW THAN COMMUNISM LATER

Every time the communists take over MILLIONS die


48 posted on 04/19/2012 5:09:00 PM PDT by Mr. K (If Romney wins the primary, I am writing-in PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson