Skip to comments.Attorney Larry Klayman's Statement on Florida Ballot Challenge Filed Against Barack Obama
Posted on 04/17/2012 10:52:35 PM PDT by rxsid
"Attorney Larry Klayman's Statement on Florida Ballot Challenge Filed Against Barack Obama
Statement by Larry Klayman, Esq. on Florida Ballot Challenge
Mr. Klayman, Founder of Judicial Watch, Freedom Watch and the only one to ever successfully sue a sitting President, is representing Mike Voeltz, of Plantation, FL in his Obama ballot challenge.
I took this case on in my private capacity because it is at the epicenter of not only a major Constitutional crisis, but one of which most people are completely unaware, or they have allowed themselves to be convinced is merely a sideshow promoted by carnival barkers. Thank you for that colorful, but inaccurate imagery, Mr. Obama.
My work on the case representing Jerome Corsi vs Esquire, on defendants alleged attempted suppression of the Wheres the Birth Certificate book, made me aware of how outrageous the fraud of forged documents and stolen identity is. This is major; unprecedented for a (putative) sitting President of the USA. Even if that wasnt the case, he would still be ineligible for the office, supported by his own admission that his father was never a citizen. Centuries of settled law established that.
So I looked at all this, looked at over 100 lost cases to date, looked at the solid opposition of Republicrat officials, media, courts, Congress, agencies, and still thoughtI simply must do something. There must be at least one honest judge left in our troubled nation, one who will review the overwhelming evidence in a properly pleaded case and rule that this usurper doesnt belong on the Florida ballot. We already have more than enough evidence to get Obama outwe simply need someone to do the right thing. Ill do my part, if judges and enough citizens do theirs.
Why Florida?Currently, the case has been filed, amended once, and is now in discovery. We anticipate interrogatories, fending off a motion to dismiss, and a hearing, with witnesses, evidence. We intend to rectify the injustice inflicted upon registered Democrat plaintiff Michael Voeltz in having an ineligible candidate fraudulently talk his way onto the ballot of the great state of Florida. In doing so, we will also benefit millions and millions of other citizens of Florida and our beloved nation. In the event we should not succeed in that mission, we will still succeed in exposing the crimes of AKA Barack Hussein Obama and his enablers, rendering re-election an impossibility, something the Republicans have so far been unableor unwillingto do.
We can file in any one of numerous counties
Quite a few of those counties are very conservative
I like Florida, the third biggest state, which is electorally vote-rich, and where I have lived for many years, worked very successfully on the Gore vs. Bush and other cases, and know my way around the landscapeand the law here. Indeed, I ran for the U.S. Senate myself in Florida in 2004.
If we can knock Obama off the ballot in Florida he cannot win the 2012 presidential elections. Its that simple.
I would also like to personally thank Sam Sewell, Project Manager of the Florida Ballot Challenge for his work in securing sizable contributions for our effort.
"Attorney Larry Klayman's Statement on Florida Ballot Challenge Filed Against Barack Obama"
In America race trumps everything else, particularly if you’re non-white. So this has about a 0.0001% chance of succeeding.
Thanks for the ping!
So this has about a 0.0001% chance of succeeding.
I wish I had the money I gave to Larry K. and Judicial Watch during the Clinton years.
I don’t know...seems like more and more people are getting real sick of this half white fraud.
I have come to the conclusion that there is a national security issue involved in this situation. It is the only thing that would trump law in this nation.
After going over my research, I picked at some clues and teased out the determination that Stanley Armour Dunham worked for the CIA. Obama may know something, gleaned from his grandfather, that would be so terribly damaging to national security that everyone in Washington, D.C., is walking on eggshells.
The fact that Republicans are so desperate to oust Obama through an election that they tolerate Romney, a pathological liar and self-professed progressive socialist to buy his way into the Republican nomination, is a measure of how desperate politicians are to get Obama out of the White House without causing a major international blowup.
Question remains, will someone in a position of power to do anything about this fraud...actually stand up for the Constitution and rule of law?
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot. - Mark Twain (1904).
They will, when they consider it politically profitable and safe to do so.
They will, when they consider it politically profitable and safe to do so.
judges and enough citizens do theirs.
This "IF we can find someone ...." is where the damn thing has always broken down. Whether one thinks Obama is legitimate or not, the very least a rational being can say is "It is an issue worthy of our attention."
It is the constitutional duty of every state attorney general to address the issue.
Re: 0’s maternal grandfather being cia and info damaging to national security-
I think you are onto something.
Could it be something to do with nuke secrets?
That was the big thing back then....
Thanks, Kenny Bunk.
Thank goodness for Jerome Corsi, the guys down in AZ, and others keeping this alive. The man is a fraud and absolutely should have never been president. It truly has been a disaster for our country.
I think it shows just the opposite. Nominating Romney shows me they WANT obama to stay in office. At least it shows they don’t have the courage to challenge him.
I also think that’s why Sarah Palin didn’t run. She knew there was too much power there to defeat. This “machine” shut the Clintons down.
And that is saying something!
Or is he merely the "Dirty Mop" boy slopping the way to make even her look acceptible?
Eligibility is NO sideshow. When the Office of Chief Executive can be occupied by someone with no regard for the Law then none of us need to. Not a pretty place to visit, much less live there.
I couldn’t agree more.
Without getting into just what the particular national security issue (or issues) could be, I have inevitably found myself in the same place. There are any number of reasons, from greed to apathy to fear for the safety of oneself or that of one's kin that can explain much of the complicity, both active and passive on the part of personages who could force the issue.
I've come to a point intellectually where the media, governmental, judicial blackout is so all-encompassing that the odds of it being such a near totality is statistically impossible. It's like the vote percentages that Saddam Hussein (heh) used to get in "elections" in Iraq. The only thing to my mind therefore, that could explain the lack of vocal, persistent pushback on the usurpation by patriots of prominence who would risk the safety of not only themselves, but those close to them to make the truth heard, is that they've been convinced utterly that whatever is in play, it is so dire that it would mean the end of the country, and in a bang, not a whimper.
$.02 no charge.
Thanks for the Ping, rxsid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.