LOL, the Israeli's put SCOTUS in a no-win situation. If they acknowledged the corporate aspect of the individual, they would have exposed The Great Fraud against The People. The term "individual" also include a "natural person" (the term the Court used) acting in their "corporate capacity" (a mythological status whereby a human being is presumed to have granted the State the power of their creation, and acknowledges that said State is therefore their owner). Of course, the corporate individual is, in fact, a fundamental lie. But it behooves the State to presume it when they want.
Or, as in this case, not presume it - thus allowing the SCOTUS to throw up its hands and say, wait a minute, only real human beings, natural persons, can commit terrorism - not the legal fiction of a corporation. We're shocked, shocked I say, that anyone would believe that a mere piece of paper can be charged with anything."
Of course, if you try to actually apply this law to an actual human being NOT "in their corporate capacity" - i.e. a "natural person," why then, it doesn't apply either, because it's a statute, and statutes apply only to people in their corporate capacity.
So who DOES it apply to? Easy - anyone they want it to. They just assume that person acted "in their corporate capacity."