Skip to comments.Obama lawyer Angelo Genova tries to suppress & intimidate NJ conservative press & citizen journalist
Posted on 04/19/2012 1:54:18 PM PDT by Brown Deer
I heard this morning that the Obama lawyers are trying to suppress the videos of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge public hearing. I just spoke with Attorney Mario Apuzzo and he confirmed that Obamas lawyers have called him and told him they are planning to take legal action to get the videos of the NJ Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing pulled and suppressed. What is the Obama side ashamed of and doesnt want the world to see. Could it be that their Obama emperor has no clothing on, i.e., has no known conclusively proven true legal identity clothing/papers to show the world which Attorney Mario Apuzzo forced them to admit to and stipulate to in the NJ public hearing? Obamas side obviously does not want people to see this video. Watch it yourself at the below links and learn why. The Obama side even wants to allow Mickey Mouse to run for President. To Obama and his lawyers the U.S. Constitution and presidential eligibility clause in Article II is a joke. You can see that in Part II at about 40 minutes into that segment. It was interesting that Obamas lawyer chose and mentioned Mickey Mouse running for President and making a mockery of the election process in her statements in the hearing as Mickey Mouse was a contributor to Obamas campaign in 2008 as part of the untraceable debit and credit card contributions that Obama accepted online, a good chunk of it alleged to have been illegally provided to Obama operatives from foreign sources. Full Video of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing. Obamas attorney did not wish the proceedings video taped. It has been learned from sources who recorded these videos with the courts permission under NJ law that Obamas lawyer did not want the hearing video taped and she tried before the start of the public hearing to get the cameras removed. However under NJ state law, video taping of public hearings is permitted. Now the Obama legal team wants to suppress these videos. See this channel link for the videos of this public hearing and/or via the other embedded links below:
scroll down to see follow up to this case....also the videos are captured so
Brett Baier FOX (Special Report) is the only reporter I know who reports on these cases. He uses tritter now instead of e-mail. Anyone use twitter? Please send him your link.
I wish that people who write these blogs would leave metaphorical comments like the “emperor’s clothes” at home. It takes a really talented author to pull it off. Sorry, this guy didn’t make it.
The resulting article is a mish-mash of factual information interspersed with opinion and conjecture. Let others provide the commentary. The primary reporter should always adhere to the rules of the Jack Webb school of reporting: “Just the facts, Mam!”.
Thanks Brown Deer.
NE FOREIGN ILLEGAL http://pic.twitter.com/GHZQTShN;
WHAT’S UP WITH THE “FOREIGN STUDENT” ID CARD IF BHO WAS BORN IN HAWAII?? #FRAUD!!
Anybody seen this?
Nevermind, online they are saying it is fake.
There are an awful lot of posts stating that most of this article is a lie. Is there a copy of the transcript that you know of?
Obama lawyers demand: Take down those videos!
Jerome R. Corsi made the latest Obama eligibility issue famous with this story about the hearing. Then, on Tuesday afternoon, Alexandra Hills boss called Mario Apuzzo directly. CNAV heard first from Nick Purpura and then directly from Apuzzo.
Apuzzo received a call from a man identifying himself as Angelo Genova, the lead partner of Genova, Burns, Giantomasi and Webster. Genova was agitated and almost overwrought. He demanded to know why Apuzzo had videotaped the proceedings (a thing Apuzzo did not do), and then said that he would move to strike the video from the record. Genova also said that:
Alexandra M. Hill is not working on the case of Purpura and Moran v. Obama any longer. Angelo Genova has taken that case over and is handling it personally.
Interesting...U.S. Senate Sergeant-at-Arms views The Birther Report blog.
there are videos of the entire proceeding.
I have no idea what ORYR hoped to accomplish by publishing that info. It's either a big nothingburger designed to do little more than garner site hits and the subject had, if not an official, then at least an idle curiosity reason for checking out the site, or he's placed the user of that computer in hot water at the very least, if not outright danger.
So much for the “we know nothing” defense.
FYI, I just read on another FR thread that attorney Apuzzo will appeal his case to a NJ state appellate court with argument scheduled for May 31. Wish him the best, but this being NJ, I can’t be optimistic about his chances.