Posted on 04/22/2012 10:06:22 AM PDT by Eye of Newt
This post is suitable for copying and posting in forums and other sites,
and for sending in emails. Please do.
No matter who is telling you to cave for him, here are the facts…
Cataloging Mitt Romney’s habit pattern of lying:
Mitt Romney’s leftist, globalist adviser team:
Mitt Romney is an implementer of Agenda 21, the globalist, Marxist/fascist ground war
against American sovereignty and freedom:
Newt Gingrich is on the upswing — We can prevent globalist Quisling Romney
from gaining 1,144 — We can nominate and elect Newt Gingrich:
Newt Gingrich, on globalism:
Newt Gingrich, on the global Marxist Insurrection:
Comparison, Mitt Romney’s & Newt Gingrich’s Politics:
_____________
More on Mitt Romney, constantly updated:
More on Newt Gingrich, constantly updated:
_____________
This post is suitable for copying and posting in forums and other sites,
and for sending in emails. Please do.
This is very important to get out there. I hope I got Free Republic posting right.
And for more of the big picture, about how this works:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2875123/posts?page=1
http://gulagbound.com/28553/what-is-an-overton-window-again/
In his book "Public Opinion, Walter Lippmann(who can be considered the father of modern journalism) explains on page 358:
The hypothesis, which seems to me the most fertile, is that news and truth are not the same thing, and must be clearly distinguished. The function of news is to signalize an event, the function of truth is to bring to light the hidden facts, to set them into relation with each other, and make a picture of reality on which men can act. Only at those points, where social conditions take recognizable and measurable shape, do the body of truth and the body of news coincide. That is a comparatively small part of the whole field of human interest. In this sector, and only in this sector, the tests of the news are sufficiently exact to make the charges of perversion or suppression more than a partisan judgment. There is no defense, no extenuation, no excuse whatever, for stating six times that Lenin is dead, when the only information the paper possesses is a report that he is dead from a source repeatedly shown to be unreliable. The news, in that instance, is not "Lenin Dead" but "Helsingfors Says Lenin is Dead." And a newspaper can be asked to take the responsibility of not making Lenin more dead than the source of the news is reliable; if there is one subject on which editors are most responsible it is in their judgment of the reliability of the source. But when it comes to dealing, for example, with stories of what the Russian people want, no such test exists.
The absence of these exact tests accounts, I think, for the character of the profession, as no other explanation does. There is a very small body of exact knowledge, which it requires no outstanding ability or training to deal with. The rest is in the journalist's own discretion.
Part of what I wrote here.
Time well spent IMO and it ties in with what you've posted in reply 3.
Is Romney a RINOlander,
Who caves-in to Debt-Decline?
Will he re-write Obama”care,”
And propel us into financial hell?
Will Romney cast out REASON,
And join the Democrat’s lot?
Romney’s past brings sparse hope to mind,
Of those that are TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY,
Of those who are not blind.
Ping
Well wrought.
Thank you. So “true.”
Thank you. Very apt, indeed.
Why is it that evildoers who promote evil WORK harder at achieving their means than do the righteous who promote good - or so it seems?
Good observation. It would seem to parallel this observation, "...the people of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the people of the light," (verse 8).
Perhaps the key phrase is, "with their own?" Flesh appeals to flesh - and to the flesh in all of us.
indeed
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
