Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Monty22002
And so the Iranians will have the ability to build W68s or or W80s or anything like them? The original and lower-tech nukes - which is where the Iranians and North Koreans are at the moment - were weighty and bulky.

Give us all a break. I'm just tired of the BS artists out there with their "weather balloon advanced delivery systems". Both the dingbat Iranians and the North Koreans have long-range missiles and the ability to adapt designs to a naval platform. We should be worried about them and nukes, just not harebrained.

49 posted on 04/28/2012 11:25:27 AM PDT by Chainmail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Chainmail

as someone said, don;t need a weather balloon just a container ship or big a supertanker sitting off singapore and use it to launch small submersibles like the drug cartels are using.

as a student of naval warfare i have always wondered why navies build what they build. any supertanker could be easliy converted to helicpter operations or ssm platforms given how easy it is with modules. armor up the superstructure and engine area which, being larger, tends to attract asm’s. a hull that size can take numerous hits and stay afloat. cheap , expendable, and huge stike capability.


50 posted on 04/28/2012 11:44:49 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (If the little things really bother you, maybe it's because the big things are going well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Chainmail
Ya know, my initial comment (at #15) mentioned "balloon" exactly once. And it also mentioned "missile" exactly once. You latched on to the "balloon" and beat it to death. Now you are saying that Iran has missiles and that Iran could adapt these to a naval platform.

Gee, maybe that's a lot like what I was saying at #15. You COULD have responded "I think your balloon comment is harebrained, but you may have a point about the missile". Nut "Noooooooooooooooo". You had to repeatedly tell me that I needed to educate myself.

I say (again) I'm concerned about Iran, and nukes, and their statement that they can get darn close to NYC. That's pretty much all I've been trying to say. You either have concerns about that, or you don't.

53 posted on 04/28/2012 12:25:32 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Chainmail

I was just correcting you. You specifically stated “Even advanced Nuclear warheads weigh well over a ton” which is incorrect.


55 posted on 04/28/2012 1:07:26 PM PDT by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Chainmail

Build them? No need. Iran probably has one or more ex-Soviet nukes, one of the not small number that were ‘lost’ after the Soviet empire collapsed.


80 posted on 04/29/2012 9:09:01 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson