Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Obama Executive Order Pushes Us Closer To A North American Union And A One World Economic System
The American Dream ^ | 5.2.12 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 05/02/2012 6:44:20 AM PDT by Whenifhow

When it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist. He firmly believes that more "global governance" (the elite don't like to use the term "global government") will make the world a much better place. Throughout his time in the White House, Obama has consistently sought to strengthen international institutions such as the UN, the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. At every turn, Obama has endeavored to more fully integrate America into the "global community". Since he was elected, Obama has signed a whole host of new international economic agreements. He regularly speaks of the need for "cooperation" among global religions and he has hosted a wide variety of different religious celebrations at the White House. Obama once stated that "all nations must come together to build a stronger global regime". If you do not want to live in a "global regime" that is just too bad. To globalists such as Obama, it is inevitable that the United States of America will be merged into the emerging global system. Just this week, Obama has issued a new executive order that seeks to "harmonize" U.S. economic regulations with the rest of the world. This new executive order is yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a North American Union and a one world economic system. Unfortunately, most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.

The American people need to understand that Barack Obama is constantly looking for ways to integrate the United States more deeply with the rest of the world. The globalization of the world economy has accelerated under Obama, and this latest executive order represents a fundamental change in U.S. economic policy. Now federal regulators will be required to "harmonize" their work with the international community. The following is how this new executive order was assessed in a recent Businessweek article....

Obama’s order provides a framework to organize scattered efforts to promote international regulatory cooperation, the chamber’s top global regulatory official said today.

“Today’s executive order marks a paradigm shift for U.S. regulators by directing them to take the international implications of their work into account in a consistent and comprehensive way,” Sean Heather, vice president of the chamber’s Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation, said in an e-mailed statement.

Members of the Obama administration are touting this as a way to "reduce regulation", but the truth is that this is much more about aligning ourselves with the rest of the world than anything else.

Obama's "Information Czar", Cass Sunstein, authored a piece in the Wall Street Journal on Monday in which he stressed the need to eliminate "unnecessary regulatory differences across nations" so that the United States can compete more effectively in our "interdependent global economy". The end result of this process will be that we will now do things much more like how the rest of the world does things....

In an interdependent global economy, diverse regulations can cause trouble for companies doing business across national boundaries. Unnecessary differences in countries' regulatory requirements can cost money, compromising economic growth and job creation. Think of divergent requirements for car headlights, or the labeling of food, or standards for container sizes.

Recognizing this, President Obama's Jobs Council has called for U.S. agencies to better align U.S. regulations with those of our major trading partners. And today the president is issuing an executive order, "Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation," with a simple goal: to promote exports, growth, and job creation by eliminating unnecessary regulatory differences across nations.

But a one world economic system is not going to arrive overnight. Initially, it is much more likely that there will be a very strong push toward North American integration first. The goal will be to shape North America into an integrated regional economic unit similar to the EU. Cass Sunstein discussed how this new executive order will affect North American integration on the White House website on Tuesday....

The new Executive Order will build on work that is already underway. We have started close to home, with President Obama launching Regulatory Cooperation Councils with Prime Minister Harper of Canada and President Calderon of Mexico. The Councils are implementing work plans to eliminate or prevent the creation of unnecessary regulatory differences that adversely affect cross-border trade; to streamline regulatory requirements; and to promote greater certainty for the general public and businesses, particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises, in the regulation of food, pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology, and other areas. The United States and Canada released the United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Action Plan last December. In February, we announced the United States-Mexico High-Level Regulatory Cooperation Council (HLRCC) Work Plan.

Most Americans have absolutely no idea how far plans to integrate the United States, Canada and Mexico have advanced.

Last year, Barack Obama signed an agreement to create a "North American security perimeter" and most Americans never even heard about it because the mainstream news networks almost entirely ignored it.

But this is exactly what the globalists want. They don't want people to become alarmed by these moves toward North American integration. In fact, a document uncovered by Wikileaks shows that those involved in the effort to integrate North America believe that an "incremental" approach is best. Apparently they believe that small moves toward integration are less likely to alarm the general population. The following is from an article that appeared in The National Post last year....

The integration of North America’s economies would best be achieved through an “incremental” approach, according to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable.

The cable, released through the WikiLeaks website and apparently written Jan. 28, 2005, discusses some of the obstacles surrounding the merger of the economies of Canada, the United States and Mexico in a fashion similar to the European Union.

“An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers,” the document said. “The economic payoff of the prospective North American initiative … is available, but its size and timing are unpredictable, so it should not be oversold.”

If the people of Canada, the United States and Mexico were told that there was a plan to merge all three economies, there might be massive protests to stop it, and the globalists do not want that.

A few years ago, the "Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America" (SPP) that was being promoted by President George W. Bush started to generate quite a bit of negative publicity. That caused those seeking to integrate the economies of North America to back off for a little while.

But as an article by Jerome Corsi last year detailed, the eventual goal is to turn North America into another version of the eurozone. That includes a common currency for North America called the "amero"....

The SPP in the administration of President George W. Bush appeared designed to replicate the steps taken in Europe over a 50-year period following the end of World War II to transform an economic agreement under the European Common Market into a full-fledged regional government, operating as the European Union, with its own currency, the euro, functioning as the sole legitimate currency in what has become known as “the eurozone.”

The concern under the SPP has been that the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, could be evolved into a regional government, the North American Union, with a regional currency, the amero, designed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar.

So will we ever see the "amero" replace the U.S. dollar?

Hopefully not.

If the globalists try to introduce the "amero", it would probably be after a horrible financial crisis in which the U.S. dollar falls apart. The "amero" would be heralded as the "solution" to the problems that were plaguing the dollar.

If there ever is a move to get rid of the U.S. dollar for an international currency of some kind, the American people will need to resist it with all of their might.

The more integrated the world becomes, the more likely it becomes that we will see nightmarish global tyranny someday. It is very frightening to think of what someone very evil might do if they had the chance to run the entire planet.

Once our national sovereignty is gone, it will be incredibly difficult to get back. If the American people don't take a stand while they still can, their children may wake up someday as citizens of a very oppressive "global regime".


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: agenda21; casssunstein; executiveorder; imf; informationczar; nau; northamerican; northamericanunion; un; unitednations; worldbank; wto
From the White House Blog: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/05/01/reducing-red-tape-regulatory-reform-goes-international

Executive Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.” Executive Order 13563 requires U.S. regulators, to the extent permitted by law, to select approaches that maximize net benefits; choose the least burdensome alternative; increase public participation in the rulemaking process; design rules that are simpler and more flexible, and that provide freedom of choice; and base regulations on sound science. Executive Order 13563 also calls for an ambitious, government-wide “lookback” at existing rules, with the central goal of eliminating outdated requirements and unjustified costs.

Today, President Obama has built on Executive Order 13563 by signing a historic Executive Order on Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation. The new Executive Order will promote American exports, economic growth, and job creation by helping to eliminate unnecessary regulatory differences between the United States and other countries and by making sure that we do not create new ones.

The New Executive Order http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/05/01/executive-order-promoting-international-regulatory-cooperation

EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - PROMOTING INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY COOPERATION

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to promote international regulatory cooperation, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Policy. Executive Order 13563 of January 18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), states that our regulatory system must protect public health, welfare, safety, and our environment while promoting economic growth, innovation, competitiveness, and job creation. In an increasingly global economy, international regulatory cooperation, consistent with domestic law and prerogatives and U.S. trade policy, can be an important means of promoting the goals of Executive Order 13563.

The regulatory approaches taken by foreign governments may differ from those taken by U.S. regulatory agencies to address similar issues. In some cases, the differences between the regulatory approaches of U.S. agencies and those of their foreign counterparts might not be necessary and might impair the ability of American businesses to export and compete internationally. In meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues, international regulatory cooperation can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that are or would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation. International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.

Sec. 2. Coordination of International Regulatory Cooperation. (a) The Regulatory Working Group (Working Group) established by Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), which was reaffirmed by Executive Order 13563, shall, as appropriate: (i) serve as a forum to discuss, coordinate, and develop a common understanding among agencies of U.S. Government positions and priorities with respect to: (A) international regulatory cooperation activities that are reasonably anticipated to lead to significant regulatory actions; (B) efforts across the Federal Government to support significant, cross-cutting international regulatory cooperation activities, such as the work of regulatory cooperation councils; and

(C) the promotion of good regulatory practices internationally, as well as the promotion of U.S. regulatory approaches, as appropriate; and

(ii) examine, among other things:

(A) appropriate strategies for engaging in the development of regulatory approaches through international regulatory cooperation, particularly in emerging technology areas, when consistent with section 1 of this order;

(B) best practices for international regulatory cooperation with respect to regulatory development, and, where appropriate, information exchange and other regulatory tools; and

(C) factors that agencies should take into account when determining whether and how to consider other regulatory approaches under section 3(d) of this order.

(b) As Chair of the Working Group, the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) shall convene the Working Group as necessary to discuss international regulatory cooperation issues as described above, and the Working Group shall include a representative from the Office of the United States Trade Representative and, as appropriate, representatives from other agencies and offices.

(c) The activities of the Working Group, consistent with law, shall not duplicate the efforts of existing interagency bodies and coordination mechanisms. The Working Group shall consult with existing interagency bodies when appropriate.

(d) To inform its discussions, and pursuant to section 4 of Executive Order 12866, the Working Group may commission analytical reports and studies by OIRA, the Administrative Conference of the United States, or any other relevant agency, and the Administrator of OIRA may solicit input, from time to time, from representatives of business, nongovernmental organizations, and the public.

(e) The Working Group shall develop and issue guidelines on the applicability and implementation of sections 2 through 4 of this order.

(f) For purposes of this order, the Working Group shall operate by consensus.

Sec. 3. Responsibilities of Federal Agencies. To the extent permitted by law, and consistent with the principles and requirements of Executive Order 13563 and Executive Order 12866, each agency shall:

(a) if required to submit a Regulatory Plan pursuant to Executive Order 12866, include in that plan a summary of its international regulatory cooperation activities that are reasonably anticipated to lead to significant regulations, with an explanation of how these activities advance the purposes of Executive Order 13563 and this order;

(b) ensure that significant regulations that the agency identifies as having significant international impacts are designated as such in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, on RegInfo.gov, and on Regulations.gov;

(c) in selecting which regulations to include in its retrospective review plan, as required by Executive Order 13563, consider:

(i) reforms to existing significant regulations that address unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements between the United States and its major trading partners, consistent with section 1 of this order, when stakeholders provide adequate information to the agency establishing that the differences are unnecessary; and

(ii) such reforms in other circumstances as the agency deems appropriate; and

(d) for significant regulations that the agency identifies as having significant international impacts, consider, to the extent feasible, appropriate, and consistent with law, any regulatory approaches by a foreign government that the United States has agreed to consider under a regulatory cooperation council work plan.

Sec. 4. Definitions. For purposes of this order:

(a) "Agency" means any authority of the United States that is an "agency" under 44 U.S.C. 3502(1), other than those considered to be independent regulatory agencies, as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5).

(b) "International impact" is a direct effect that a proposed or final regulation is expected to have on international trade and investment, or that otherwise may be of significant interest to the trading partners of the United States.

(c) "International regulatory cooperation" refers to a bilateral, regional, or multilateral process, other than processes that are covered by section 6(a)(ii), (iii), and (v) of this order, in which national governments engage in various forms of collaboration and communication with respect to regulations, in particular a process that is reasonably anticipated to lead to the development of significant regulations.

(d) "Regulation" shall have the same meaning as "regulation" or "rule" in section 3(d) of Executive Order 12866.

(e) "Significant regulation" is a proposed or final regulation that constitutes a significant regulatory action.

(f) "Significant regulatory action" shall have the same meaning as in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.

Sec. 5. Independent Agencies. Independent regulatory agencies are encouraged to comply with the provisions of this order.

Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof;

(ii) the coordination and development of international trade policy and negotiations pursuant to section 411 of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2451) and section 141 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171);

(iii) international trade activities undertaken pursuant to section 3 of the Act of February 14, 1903 (15 U.S.C. 1512), subtitle C of the Export Enhancement Act of 1988, as amended (15 U.S.C. 4721 et seq.), and Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2171 note);

(iv) the authorization process for the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112b(c) and its implementing regulations (22 C.F.R. 181.4) and implementing procedures (11 FAM 720);

(v) activities in connection with subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31 of the United States Code, title 26 of the United States Code, or Public Law 111-203 and other laws relating to financial regulation; or

(vi) the functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

1 posted on 05/02/2012 6:44:33 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum; LucyT; NObama; TEXOKIE; Travis McGee; Quix; NorwegianViking

White House Blog:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/05/01/reducing-red-tape-regulatory-reform-goes-international

The New Executive Order
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/05/01/executive-order-promoting-international-regulatory-cooperation


2 posted on 05/02/2012 6:48:55 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

His May Day present to US.


3 posted on 05/02/2012 6:49:32 AM PDT by MurrietaMadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

That will continue with Romney. It does not matter which one will be in office.


4 posted on 05/02/2012 7:03:55 AM PDT by ivory49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; Alamo-Girl; Amityschild; AngieGal; AnimalLover; Ann de IL; aposiopetic; aragorn; ...

END TIMES PING LIST PING

White House Blog:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/05/01/reducing-red-tape-regulatory-reform-goes-international

The New Executive Order
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/05/01/executive-order-promoting-international-regulatory-cooperation

. . . CLOSER TO NORTH AMERICAN UNION . . .


5 posted on 05/02/2012 7:26:28 AM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ivory49

That will continue with Romney. It does not matter which one will be in office.


INDEED.

However, I consider OThuga’s demonization, ruthlessness, lying, hatred, meanness etc. to be significantly worse than Mitt’s.


6 posted on 05/02/2012 7:28:06 AM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Quix

The advance of a One World Government and a North American Union
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/05/advance-of-one-world-government-and.html

The paragraphs below are quotes from this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304811304577369934135888006.html

Excerpt:
Here’s the advancing of the North American union:

More generally, President Obama has worked closely with his Canadian and Mexican counterparts to create High-Level Regulatory Cooperation Councils with both countries. The councils are developing and implementing plans to eliminate or prevent the creation of unnecessary burdens on cross-border trade, streamline regulatory requirements, and promote greater certainty for the general public and for businesses in the regulation of food, pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology and other areas.

The U.S. and Canada have already agreed to harmonize their rules with respect to fuel economy, building on a long history of collaboration on national emission standards for new vehicles. This step will avoid divergent requirements and unnecessary costs on both automobile companies and consumers.

Here’s the advance of the One World government:

The U.S. is also working closely with the European Union to eliminate unnecessary differences in U.S.-European regulatory requirements. Last February, the Obama administration announced an agreement with the EU under which organic products certified as such in Europe or in the U.S. may be sold as “organic” in either jurisdiction. This is not just a victory for those who grow and eat organic broccoli. The trans-Atlantic partnership, involving the two largest organic food producers in the world, will help support jobs in the years to come.


7 posted on 05/02/2012 8:11:10 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quix

However, I consider OThuga’s demonization, ruthlessness, lying, hatred, meanness etc. to be significantly worse than Mitt’s.


Absolutely!


8 posted on 05/02/2012 8:14:01 AM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

YUP!


9 posted on 05/02/2012 8:52:58 AM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
If there ever is a move to get rid of the U.S. dollar for an international currency of some kind, the American people will need to resist it with all of their might.

Oh, that is rich. The American people resist and Congress does what it always does...ignore the protests and make up Quisling reasons to proceed anyway while saying, "Trust us, we know that in the long run it'll be for the good of America".

10 posted on 05/02/2012 9:15:49 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; Wilhelm Tell
A few years ago, the "Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America" (SPP) that was being promoted by President George W. Bush started to generate quite a bit of negative publicity. That caused those seeking to integrate the economies of North America to back off for a little while.

@It's time for a North American Union June 25, 2006

The socialists see this as an opportunity to get over 300 million people that they can mold together in a giant social experiment.
History shows that they've already performed their social experiment several times.
Headstones mark their testing ground.

@Meet Robert Pastor: Father of the North American Union July 26, 2006

@Here's a good keyword...Hemispheric Agenda September 27, 2006

THE SUMMIT PROCESS AND THE HEMISPHERIC AGENDA

11 posted on 05/02/2012 9:36:07 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Fixed link...
@THE SUMMIT PROCESS AND THE HEMISPHERIC AGENDAThe juncture of the Organization’s fifty years trajectory coincides with regional projections for a new millennium and the unfolding of the feature of hemispheric summitry, the later at the initiative of President Clinton of the United States, in 1994.
12 posted on 05/02/2012 9:41:26 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
@THE AMERICAS AND THE 21ST CENTURY Air Date: April 29, 1997
Guest: Robert Pastor, Director, Latin American and Caribbean Program, The Carter Center So we imagine talking about those issues, but our major focus on democratization will be now to shift to what we consider the second generation issues. What is interesting about the second generation issues which relate to the deepening of democratization, is that the problems are shared as is the social agenda for all the countries in the hemisphere, and the problem, the fundamental problem is how do you cleanse the electoral process of the poisonous effect of money. Now on an issue like that, I'm afraid the U.S. does not have much to teach the Latin America and the Caribbean, but it may have something to learn. The nature of campaign finance, of access to the media, these are issues in which all of the countries in the hemisphere are struggling for the best models, and we hope that some of those models will be discussed and that the results will have a big influence on the United Sates as well as those countries that have not yet found a way to deal with this issue.
13 posted on 05/02/2012 9:56:04 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

“The United States and Canada released the United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Action Plan last December. In February, we announced the United States-Mexico High-Level Regulatory Cooperation Council (HLRCC) Work Plan.”

Funny, I don’t recall the Imperial Senate ratifying this....


14 posted on 05/02/2012 10:03:54 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Right Of You To Be You Is At Stake....Resist Cultural Marxism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; tomdavidd; Freeper; Gvl_M3; Flotsam_Jetsome; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

New Obama Executive Order Pushes Us Closer To A North American Union And A One World Economic System

Thanks, Whenifhow.

15 posted on 05/02/2012 11:14:35 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
...."When it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist.... He firmly believes that more "global governance" (the elite don't like to use the term "global government") will make the world a much better place."...

Romney is equally on par with Obama in this..with his own "footsoldiers" carrying that message for him in arenas Internationally....there is no difference among these two....., it really does not matter which one of them wins. Either one of them will do the bidding of the New World Order.

Romney.....“I support Cap-and-Trade on a 'global basis' but not the USA going alone. I want to do it with other nations involved and on a 'global scale'.”.....

Note:...Under Mitt Romney as governor, Massachusetts became the Very First State to pass a law to regulate carbon emissions.

Globalism is tearing our economy apart more every day, if Romney is elected the globalist agenda will only 'accelerate'.

16 posted on 05/03/2012 12:09:50 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks for the ping Lucy...


17 posted on 05/03/2012 12:10:42 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ivory49
Most Americans have absolutely no idea how far plans to integrate the United States, Canada and Mexico have advanced.

This is why the borders will NOT be secured...nor the immigration issues resolved, and why none of the Presidents past or in the future will act on the borders.

The Integration of these three nations will be another type of Europe. ...and has been going on for along time now..and not just under Obama.

Every decision a Pres. and Congress does is 'centered' on how much and if that decision will affect this integration plan of these three nations....also why Mexico has so many organizations and Attorneys settled in our nation...and the push for Mexican representation in our political offices.

18 posted on 05/03/2012 12:20:43 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

IIRC something called ISO (International Standards Organization) seemingly harmless until it grew in scope, and demands. I first encountered it in the International Shipping Industry when it started up in the seventies, and set off warning bells.

I’ve seen many a company spend a fortune in qualifying for ISO status only to gain it, and find it wasn’t worth it, or was restrictive of their business, and drop out.


19 posted on 05/03/2012 3:56:11 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Yaelle; butterdezillion

This “Executive” Order is just another way for Obama to say the following:

“America has no laws that I can’t break.

Just look at me, ALL of my personal documents are forged or “missing,” (wink, wink), I went to Occidental College in California as a Foreign Student, never graduated from Harvard, never took the Lawyers Bar exam, and here I am!

Your “Constitution” hasn’t been enforced in YEARS!

If I can do it, anybody in the World can rule you! It was REALLY easy!

Besides, with my Nobel Peace Prize in hand, I have the moral authority to send a drone to assassinate anyone in the World who objects to my Marxist vision of the World. Nobody will dare to stop me. Deal with it!

You Americans really are a stupid bunch of sorry people.”

BTW, I’ll bet the Liberal Agenda Media (LAM) will ask him: “What was your Golf score today?”


20 posted on 05/03/2012 4:46:10 AM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

I listened to part of Rush’s show yesterday. I hadn’t realized that the past 3 years without a budget means that our government is funded by a continuing resolution, so the choices are “pass this continuing resolution or the government will be shut down”.

IOW, the budget is held hostage by dems having control of the necessary 2 of the 3 law-making entities (House, Senate, White House). The nation is being managed by impulse spending, Our credit cards are maxed out, we’re in debt beyond what anybody will ever be able to pay back, and we’re going through the store picking up whatever junk food looks good at the moment because if we don’t eat something we’ll starve.

At the same time, the House is doing the best they can to keep the treasonous Senate dems in gridlock, to foil their efforts to sell the country down the river. So Obama is the only ruling force, and he is ruling by dictates (executive orders).

How is any of this different than a dictatorship? It’s not. We’re already living in a dictatorship.

We’ve got the framework for accountability, supposedly. But Eric Holder, NARA, Obama, etc have all laughed in the faces of Congressional hearings/investigations and inspector general audits/reports. Unless and until somebody is thrown in jail by these entities, we have no accountability.

Unless and until we have some way of making sure that the votes that are “counted” even vaguely resemble who real people in real voting booths actually voted for, the whole electoral “accountability” is a farce - a billion-dollar dance where people go through the motions pretending any of it has any relation to what the “election results” are going to say.

What we have here is cancer that has pervaded the entire US system. If this putrid system then plugs into the cancerous bloodstream of a communist-Islamist world system (which is what the UN is, for instance), there will be no way for us to ever be healed.

And from what Bill Ayers is telling college students, it sounds like that rotten bloodstream is feeling pretty confident that they’ve got us beaten.

People need to know this. They need to know that this is and has been a complete coup, and that the Bill Ayers/George Soros/Barack Obama/Hezbollah/Muslim Brotherhood alliance is saying to them as well as to Rush Limbaugh, “Obama’s minions are taking over and there’s nothing you can do about it.” They’re flipping the bird at the whole system and at each one of us individually, saying “Might makes right. Now bend over and take what you’ve got coming.”


21 posted on 05/03/2012 6:06:46 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; Yaelle; blam; Oldeconomybuyer; detective; hocndoc; Brown Deer; bitt; ...

” - - - I hadn’t realized that the past 3 years without a budget means that our government is funded by a continuing resolution, so the choices are “pass this continuing resolution or the government will be shut down”.

I had not realized that either.

Shutting the Federal Government down would be the ultimate method of reducing Federal Spending, and is the “shut down and control” purpose that Sen. Reid has refused to allow a budget to be passed in the US Senate for the last 3 years.

With the US Federal Government shut down, the Liberal Agenda Media can then easily villianize the sorry RINO Party as having caused the shutdown to protect the rich, who aren’t paying their fair share, etc., etc., etc.

The RINO Party will Cave-In, fall on their sword, and slink off into History.

Who then will ride in on the proverbial white horse of goodness? Why, none other that the Coward from Kenya himself: Dictator, High Poo-Bah, Illegal Foreign White House Occupier, “You Lie” Obama, followed by the Las Vegas planner of GSA Conventions, Sen. Reid.

Then Price, Profit and People Control, (PPPC), will reign until after Obama is re-elected in a landslide. Afterall, NOBODY wants to change horses in the middle of a stream filled with the voter’s threatened Entitlements!

BTW, the next scheduled shutdown of the “non essential” staff of the US Federal Government is estimated to be next month, when the delayed Budget deal of last year expires. Well, some experts say that could be delayed until October.

BTW, BTW, should US Senators be included as non-essential Federal employees? Of course they would be considered to be non-essential only during THE BUDGET CRISIS OF 2012. Then they can be re-instated to their former status of doing nothing.

BTW, BTW, BTW, Obama and Reid’s ace in the hole is that Romney has already started to soften his negative comments to Obama. Whatta team player Romney is to “both” political parties!

WORK TO ACHIEVE AN OPEN CONVENTION IN TAMPA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


22 posted on 05/03/2012 9:36:22 AM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Andrew Breitbart left us knowing more than he had time to disclose to us.

What did he know that we need to re-discover, document and publish?

Why are ALL of Obama’s important early documents forged?

Where was Obama during his “Lost Years?”

Why are there so few known Obama childhood friends?

How many of Obama’s childhood buddies are still alive?

Was Obama a FOREIGN student at Occidental, Columbia or Harvard?

Who wrote the checks for Obama’s education?

Where these question that Andrew Beitbart knew some of the answers to?

____________

To tie the above with some speculative food for thought, please indulge me, (but DO ponder the speculations), as I re-post one of my recently updated comments as follows:

A dictator, such as Obama, only has the power that the people give him.

Currently, at least 40 % of polled American voters are gladly willing to give Obama the necessary power to continue his arrogant dictatorship.

About 47 % of American voters pay NO Personal Federal Income Taxes. These voters are the “fair share” voter base for Dictator Obama. We, in the 53 %, then are paying this 47 % to vote for Obama by virtue of us paying taxes for ourselves AND them.

In this manner we are supporting the voters who vote for Obama, and they will vote to do so again in November.

Dictator Obama has designed Obama”care” to become active only AFTER he is to be re-elected, thus enabling THE NINE SUPREMES to delay ruling on the Constitutionality of the dictate of the individual mandate until Obama is once again the Illegal Foreign White House Occupier, (IFWHO).

The purpose of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack is simple: 1.) Regulate; 2.) Control; and 3.) Destroy. By his own count he has already achieved 60 % of his goals, according to the note he says he carries in his pocket.

Obama’s obvious arrogant and deep hatred of America could have only come from what he was taught in his childhood.

Since there are no known networks of childhood friends from Obama’s past, Obama was probably a member of a Marxist sleeper cell funded by wealthy men with a Marxist view of the World.

The lack of credible documents that has NOT been forged requires a long-term, highly skilled and well-funded support group.

Who the key members of Obama’s probable support group and probable sleeper cell were and are is well known to the Interpol, CIA and the FBI.

Will “Citizen Journalists” such as Breitbart Editor Joel Pollack be able to out-spy the latter two US tax-funded spy entities?

BTW, forget about the LAM, (Liberal Agenda Media), as they are saving their notes to write their tell-all Obama books after Obama has SAFELY retired back home in Kenya.

BTW, BTW, to all the doubters of the above speculations: what does your gut tell you?

______________________

The questions we ask
Are simple to say,
One wonders why they
Were not asked,
Back in the Day?

Meanwhile the drumbeat of Dictator, (in his own mind), Obama grows louder:

regulate —— control —— destroy —— Regulate —— control —— destroy —— REgulate —— control —— destroy —— REGulate —— control —— destroy —— REGU


23 posted on 05/03/2012 9:40:46 AM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf; All; Spunky; ~Kim4VRWC's~; ~Peter; 1035rep; 2ndDivisionVet; 3D-JOY; 4woodenboats; ...

After only a quick read by me, does anyone else see the implications of this Executive Order for enhancing the international interests of the Moslem Brotherhood or foreign governments like the new ones in Libya or Egypt?


24 posted on 05/03/2012 12:43:26 PM PDT by FARS (Be Healthy, Happy and Thrive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FARS

” At the same time, the House is doing the best they can to keep the treasonous Senate dems in gridlock, to foil their efforts to sell the country down the river. So Obama is the only ruling force, and he is ruling by dictates (executive orders).

How is any of this different than a dictatorship? It’s not. We’re already living in a dictatorship.”


25 posted on 05/03/2012 12:59:42 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FARS

I don’t even have to read it. Everything Obama does helps groups like the Muslim Bro’hood and/or moves us a step closer to the North American Union of Socialist Republics.


26 posted on 05/03/2012 1:27:10 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ivory49

>>That will continue with Romney. It does not matter which one will be in office.

Obama is a communist. Romney is a “capitalism for the wealthy, socialism for the masses” guy. I’m not sure what you label that, but it seems to be the direction of the US under two republican and one democrat presidents from 1988 to 2008.

Obama hates white people. Romney seems to like white people.

Obama thinks America is evil. At worst, Romney thinks America is misguided.

America can survive a Romney presidency. It can’t survive another 4 years of ObaMao.


27 posted on 05/03/2012 1:33:59 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ivory49

Romney is Obama lite. It’ll be the same commie carp just perhaps a bit slower. There is no longer a two party system.


28 posted on 05/03/2012 2:14:08 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
I hate to be a wet blanket, guys, but where Canada is concerned, there is absolutely NO APPETITE for a North American union. None. Zero. It is political suicide to advocate one.

“An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers,”

Somebody's view in 2005. This dog won't hunt now, not in Canada. It is absolute nonsense.

29 posted on 05/03/2012 2:18:57 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
and America takes another one in the........

30 posted on 05/03/2012 2:51:23 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
This dog won't hunt now, not in Canada.
When is the next election up there and who is going to be counting the votes?
31 posted on 05/03/2012 2:52:02 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FARS
There are limits to Executive Orders. . .'checks and balances' of a sort?

Memo to those who think that NOT suffering a vote for Mitt is better than having Obama for four more. Can anyone imagine; that Obama could/would usurp entire Constitution in time? Who has stopped him, thus far? The man has all but promised. And we know what he is capable of.

Who can safely, 'reasonably' doubt?

32 posted on 05/03/2012 4:24:55 PM PDT by cricket ( It is not just 'the economy' and Newt knows it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Three or four years and the electoral system is ENTIRELY different.

We have an actual voters list for every poll (precinct). When you show up to vote, you show ID and they cross off your name. The number of ballots used must equal the number of voters who showed up, in other words the number of names crossed off the voters list. We use paper ballots that are deposited in voting boxes. Scrutineers from all the political parties are present at all times. The votes are counted on site by the scrutineers, the results tallied, and the ballots are sealed up and sent to a central office. The process is simple. Fraud is virtually unknown and recounts are rare.

33 posted on 05/03/2012 5:04:28 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Simply put...this is Treason.

Obama, and his installed coterie, are working against the interests of the U.S.A.

Treason.
34 posted on 05/03/2012 5:25:15 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
Three or four years and the electoral system is ENTIRELY different.
So in three or four years that dog could hunt?
35 posted on 05/03/2012 6:21:00 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Brown Deer; bitt

PING : “ - - - People need to know this. They need to know that this is and has been a complete coup, - - - “


36 posted on 05/03/2012 7:59:54 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...


“ - - - People need to know this. They need to know that this is and has been a complete coup, - - - “
37 posted on 05/03/2012 9:06:36 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Thanks for the ping!


38 posted on 05/03/2012 9:24:17 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Their ambition has always been that the US has to go to the United Nations to take a leak, and if you decide to defend yourself without written permission from the UN the destination shall be the World Court. I guess what they want to see is lots of blue helmets in your streets.

One World Government = United Nations, where a block of some 70+ muslim countries and a bunch of dictators call the shots.

Zero doesn’t represent the US, he represents the UN, and is probably on the verge of being annointed a future LEADER.


39 posted on 05/03/2012 9:56:13 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Ok, the Conservative party is in power right now. That's why our economy is so strong. This is the party that is friendliest to the US.

The other parties hold anti-Americanism as a basic tenet of their existence. At this point the Liberals are in the process of destroying themselves (they haven't had a real leader in years) and the NDP (socialists) have very little support outside of Quebec and very shallow support in Quebec. I can't see either of them forming a government. If they do, being anti-American will be a basic policy.

40 posted on 05/04/2012 3:58:15 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Don't think Romney would be 'as in' to Executive Orders that dimninish America's power/influence in the world. Obama, OTOH. . .appears compulsive in his desire to do just that. . .

There ARE differences, folks. . .

41 posted on 05/04/2012 6:05:33 AM PDT by cricket ( It is not just 'the economy' and Newt knows it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww
Romney is equally on par with Obama in this..with his own "footsoldiers"

It well may be 'no accident' that we are faced with two 'similar' (albeit 'not') candidates per both Parties. Still; there are differences; there is 'still' a ideological war going on; competition among the Globalists; et al. There are better choices amongst the worst of them. We need to find the highest ground we can; so as to not lose any more than we already have.

Forget 'Forward'. . .we need to move 'UPWARD'; by whatever increments in power we can hold to.

Cannot overlook the Party demographics either, of Massachussetts, a very Liberal state. Am betting that today; the 'carbon perspective' is a bit more enlightened and suspect that Mitt is as well. If not; then the right VP may set his mind straight or 'more straight'. He will not have a communist, in any event; controlling 'Education'. The first key; of course; is who we send off to Congress. . .

That said; when it comes to a literally, communist agenda; NO Republican candidate can match Obama,Inc. and all his Czars . Not to mention; the now 'Father/son' Soros Team'. Think the Soros hand; while present, perhaps (the hand print IS global sized); cannot lay as heavy on Mitt; as it does on Obama.

42 posted on 05/04/2012 6:34:05 AM PDT by cricket ( It is not just 'the economy' and Newt knows it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

0bama went to Canada before the 2008 election. It was summer, and I thought it a violation of the Hatch act. I can find no reference to that now, but I remember it specifically because of the pic of him, surrounded by NOI security, on a tarmac in Canada. The middle of Canada, too, which made me think there was oil negotiations or whatever involved. I believe he made some statements about trade/oil afterward that are still around.

I wish someone could dig up that story.


43 posted on 05/04/2012 3:14:23 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Might find it there...

http://www.reobama.com/ObamaEh.htm

Definitely was in Canada in 2008:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2008/06/18/f-ng.html


44 posted on 05/04/2012 4:22:35 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
"Unless and until we have some way of making sure that the votes that are “counted” even vaguely resemble who real people in real voting booths actually voted for, the whole electoral “accountability” is a farce - a billion-dollar dance where people go through the motions pretending any of it has any relation to what the “election results” are going to say."

Doubtful if there is any way that we can be sure of the integrity of the ballot count with a private company from Spain collecting, integrating and counting the votes. All we can do is continue to 'pretend' lest we rise up as a nation and require a bloody recompense.

45 posted on 05/07/2012 7:47:14 PM PDT by Eastbound (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

If you want to be on or off the Agenda 21 ping list, please notify me by Freepmail. It is a relatively low volume list in which we have been exploring the UN Agenda21 and related topics. We have collected our studies with threads, links, and discussions on the Agenda 21 thread which can be found here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2738418/posts

NEW ACTION THREAD:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2861644/posts


46 posted on 05/15/2012 7:10:29 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson