and America takes another one in the........
Posted on 05/02/2012 6:44:20 AM PDT by Whenifhow
When it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist. He firmly believes that more "global governance" (the elite don't like to use the term "global government") will make the world a much better place. Throughout his time in the White House, Obama has consistently sought to strengthen international institutions such as the UN, the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. At every turn, Obama has endeavored to more fully integrate America into the "global community". Since he was elected, Obama has signed a whole host of new international economic agreements. He regularly speaks of the need for "cooperation" among global religions and he has hosted a wide variety of different religious celebrations at the White House. Obama once stated that "all nations must come together to build a stronger global regime". If you do not want to live in a "global regime" that is just too bad. To globalists such as Obama, it is inevitable that the United States of America will be merged into the emerging global system. Just this week, Obama has issued a new executive order that seeks to "harmonize" U.S. economic regulations with the rest of the world. This new executive order is yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a North American Union and a one world economic system. Unfortunately, most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.
The American people need to understand that Barack Obama is constantly looking for ways to integrate the United States more deeply with the rest of the world. The globalization of the world economy has accelerated under Obama, and this latest executive order represents a fundamental change in U.S. economic policy. Now federal regulators will be required to "harmonize" their work with the international community. The following is how this new executive order was assessed in a recent Businessweek article....
Obama’s order provides a framework to organize scattered efforts to promote international regulatory cooperation, the chamber’s top global regulatory official said today.
“Today’s executive order marks a paradigm shift for U.S. regulators by directing them to take the international implications of their work into account in a consistent and comprehensive way,” Sean Heather, vice president of the chamber’s Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation, said in an e-mailed statement.
Members of the Obama administration are touting this as a way to "reduce regulation", but the truth is that this is much more about aligning ourselves with the rest of the world than anything else.
Obama's "Information Czar", Cass Sunstein, authored a piece in the Wall Street Journal on Monday in which he stressed the need to eliminate "unnecessary regulatory differences across nations" so that the United States can compete more effectively in our "interdependent global economy". The end result of this process will be that we will now do things much more like how the rest of the world does things....
In an interdependent global economy, diverse regulations can cause trouble for companies doing business across national boundaries. Unnecessary differences in countries' regulatory requirements can cost money, compromising economic growth and job creation. Think of divergent requirements for car headlights, or the labeling of food, or standards for container sizes.
Recognizing this, President Obama's Jobs Council has called for U.S. agencies to better align U.S. regulations with those of our major trading partners. And today the president is issuing an executive order, "Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation," with a simple goal: to promote exports, growth, and job creation by eliminating unnecessary regulatory differences across nations.
But a one world economic system is not going to arrive overnight. Initially, it is much more likely that there will be a very strong push toward North American integration first. The goal will be to shape North America into an integrated regional economic unit similar to the EU. Cass Sunstein discussed how this new executive order will affect North American integration on the White House website on Tuesday....
The new Executive Order will build on work that is already underway. We have started close to home, with President Obama launching Regulatory Cooperation Councils with Prime Minister Harper of Canada and President Calderon of Mexico. The Councils are implementing work plans to eliminate or prevent the creation of unnecessary regulatory differences that adversely affect cross-border trade; to streamline regulatory requirements; and to promote greater certainty for the general public and businesses, particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises, in the regulation of food, pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology, and other areas. The United States and Canada released the United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Action Plan last December. In February, we announced the United States-Mexico High-Level Regulatory Cooperation Council (HLRCC) Work Plan.
Most Americans have absolutely no idea how far plans to integrate the United States, Canada and Mexico have advanced.
Last year, Barack Obama signed an agreement to create a "North American security perimeter" and most Americans never even heard about it because the mainstream news networks almost entirely ignored it.
But this is exactly what the globalists want. They don't want people to become alarmed by these moves toward North American integration. In fact, a document uncovered by Wikileaks shows that those involved in the effort to integrate North America believe that an "incremental" approach is best. Apparently they believe that small moves toward integration are less likely to alarm the general population. The following is from an article that appeared in The National Post last year....
The integration of North America’s economies would best be achieved through an “incremental” approach, according to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable.
The cable, released through the WikiLeaks website and apparently written Jan. 28, 2005, discusses some of the obstacles surrounding the merger of the economies of Canada, the United States and Mexico in a fashion similar to the European Union.
“An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers,” the document said. “The economic payoff of the prospective North American initiative … is available, but its size and timing are unpredictable, so it should not be oversold.”
If the people of Canada, the United States and Mexico were told that there was a plan to merge all three economies, there might be massive protests to stop it, and the globalists do not want that.
A few years ago, the "Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America" (SPP) that was being promoted by President George W. Bush started to generate quite a bit of negative publicity. That caused those seeking to integrate the economies of North America to back off for a little while.
But as an article by Jerome Corsi last year detailed, the eventual goal is to turn North America into another version of the eurozone. That includes a common currency for North America called the "amero"....
The SPP in the administration of President George W. Bush appeared designed to replicate the steps taken in Europe over a 50-year period following the end of World War II to transform an economic agreement under the European Common Market into a full-fledged regional government, operating as the European Union, with its own currency, the euro, functioning as the sole legitimate currency in what has become known as “the eurozone.”
The concern under the SPP has been that the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, could be evolved into a regional government, the North American Union, with a regional currency, the amero, designed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar.
So will we ever see the "amero" replace the U.S. dollar?
Hopefully not.
If the globalists try to introduce the "amero", it would probably be after a horrible financial crisis in which the U.S. dollar falls apart. The "amero" would be heralded as the "solution" to the problems that were plaguing the dollar.
If there ever is a move to get rid of the U.S. dollar for an international currency of some kind, the American people will need to resist it with all of their might.
The more integrated the world becomes, the more likely it becomes that we will see nightmarish global tyranny someday. It is very frightening to think of what someone very evil might do if they had the chance to run the entire planet.
Once our national sovereignty is gone, it will be incredibly difficult to get back. If the American people don't take a stand while they still can, their children may wake up someday as citizens of a very oppressive "global regime".
I listened to part of Rush’s show yesterday. I hadn’t realized that the past 3 years without a budget means that our government is funded by a continuing resolution, so the choices are “pass this continuing resolution or the government will be shut down”.
IOW, the budget is held hostage by dems having control of the necessary 2 of the 3 law-making entities (House, Senate, White House). The nation is being managed by impulse spending, Our credit cards are maxed out, we’re in debt beyond what anybody will ever be able to pay back, and we’re going through the store picking up whatever junk food looks good at the moment because if we don’t eat something we’ll starve.
At the same time, the House is doing the best they can to keep the treasonous Senate dems in gridlock, to foil their efforts to sell the country down the river. So Obama is the only ruling force, and he is ruling by dictates (executive orders).
How is any of this different than a dictatorship? It’s not. We’re already living in a dictatorship.
We’ve got the framework for accountability, supposedly. But Eric Holder, NARA, Obama, etc have all laughed in the faces of Congressional hearings/investigations and inspector general audits/reports. Unless and until somebody is thrown in jail by these entities, we have no accountability.
Unless and until we have some way of making sure that the votes that are “counted” even vaguely resemble who real people in real voting booths actually voted for, the whole electoral “accountability” is a farce - a billion-dollar dance where people go through the motions pretending any of it has any relation to what the “election results” are going to say.
What we have here is cancer that has pervaded the entire US system. If this putrid system then plugs into the cancerous bloodstream of a communist-Islamist world system (which is what the UN is, for instance), there will be no way for us to ever be healed.
And from what Bill Ayers is telling college students, it sounds like that rotten bloodstream is feeling pretty confident that they’ve got us beaten.
People need to know this. They need to know that this is and has been a complete coup, and that the Bill Ayers/George Soros/Barack Obama/Hezbollah/Muslim Brotherhood alliance is saying to them as well as to Rush Limbaugh, “Obama’s minions are taking over and there’s nothing you can do about it.” They’re flipping the bird at the whole system and at each one of us individually, saying “Might makes right. Now bend over and take what you’ve got coming.”
” - - - I hadn’t realized that the past 3 years without a budget means that our government is funded by a continuing resolution, so the choices are “pass this continuing resolution or the government will be shut down”.
I had not realized that either.
Shutting the Federal Government down would be the ultimate method of reducing Federal Spending, and is the “shut down and control” purpose that Sen. Reid has refused to allow a budget to be passed in the US Senate for the last 3 years.
With the US Federal Government shut down, the Liberal Agenda Media can then easily villianize the sorry RINO Party as having caused the shutdown to protect the rich, who aren’t paying their fair share, etc., etc., etc.
The RINO Party will Cave-In, fall on their sword, and slink off into History.
Who then will ride in on the proverbial white horse of goodness? Why, none other that the Coward from Kenya himself: Dictator, High Poo-Bah, Illegal Foreign White House Occupier, “You Lie” Obama, followed by the Las Vegas planner of GSA Conventions, Sen. Reid.
Then Price, Profit and People Control, (PPPC), will reign until after Obama is re-elected in a landslide. Afterall, NOBODY wants to change horses in the middle of a stream filled with the voter’s threatened Entitlements!
BTW, the next scheduled shutdown of the “non essential” staff of the US Federal Government is estimated to be next month, when the delayed Budget deal of last year expires. Well, some experts say that could be delayed until October.
BTW, BTW, should US Senators be included as non-essential Federal employees? Of course they would be considered to be non-essential only during THE BUDGET CRISIS OF 2012. Then they can be re-instated to their former status of doing nothing.
BTW, BTW, BTW, Obama and Reid’s ace in the hole is that Romney has already started to soften his negative comments to Obama. Whatta team player Romney is to “both” political parties!
WORK TO ACHIEVE AN OPEN CONVENTION IN TAMPA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Andrew Breitbart left us knowing more than he had time to disclose to us.
What did he know that we need to re-discover, document and publish?
Why are ALL of Obama’s important early documents forged?
Where was Obama during his “Lost Years?”
Why are there so few known Obama childhood friends?
How many of Obama’s childhood buddies are still alive?
Was Obama a FOREIGN student at Occidental, Columbia or Harvard?
Who wrote the checks for Obama’s education?
Where these question that Andrew Beitbart knew some of the answers to?
____________
To tie the above with some speculative food for thought, please indulge me, (but DO ponder the speculations), as I re-post one of my recently updated comments as follows:
A dictator, such as Obama, only has the power that the people give him.
Currently, at least 40 % of polled American voters are gladly willing to give Obama the necessary power to continue his arrogant dictatorship.
About 47 % of American voters pay NO Personal Federal Income Taxes. These voters are the “fair share” voter base for Dictator Obama. We, in the 53 %, then are paying this 47 % to vote for Obama by virtue of us paying taxes for ourselves AND them.
In this manner we are supporting the voters who vote for Obama, and they will vote to do so again in November.
Dictator Obama has designed Obama”care” to become active only AFTER he is to be re-elected, thus enabling THE NINE SUPREMES to delay ruling on the Constitutionality of the dictate of the individual mandate until Obama is once again the Illegal Foreign White House Occupier, (IFWHO).
The purpose of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack is simple: 1.) Regulate; 2.) Control; and 3.) Destroy. By his own count he has already achieved 60 % of his goals, according to the note he says he carries in his pocket.
Obama’s obvious arrogant and deep hatred of America could have only come from what he was taught in his childhood.
Since there are no known networks of childhood friends from Obama’s past, Obama was probably a member of a Marxist sleeper cell funded by wealthy men with a Marxist view of the World.
The lack of credible documents that has NOT been forged requires a long-term, highly skilled and well-funded support group.
Who the key members of Obama’s probable support group and probable sleeper cell were and are is well known to the Interpol, CIA and the FBI.
Will “Citizen Journalists” such as Breitbart Editor Joel Pollack be able to out-spy the latter two US tax-funded spy entities?
BTW, forget about the LAM, (Liberal Agenda Media), as they are saving their notes to write their tell-all Obama books after Obama has SAFELY retired back home in Kenya.
BTW, BTW, to all the doubters of the above speculations: what does your gut tell you?
______________________
The questions we ask
Are simple to say,
One wonders why they
Were not asked,
Back in the Day?
Meanwhile the drumbeat of Dictator, (in his own mind), Obama grows louder:
regulate —— control —— destroy —— Regulate —— control —— destroy —— REgulate —— control —— destroy —— REGulate —— control —— destroy —— REGU
After only a quick read by me, does anyone else see the implications of this Executive Order for enhancing the international interests of the Moslem Brotherhood or foreign governments like the new ones in Libya or Egypt?
” At the same time, the House is doing the best they can to keep the treasonous Senate dems in gridlock, to foil their efforts to sell the country down the river. So Obama is the only ruling force, and he is ruling by dictates (executive orders).
How is any of this different than a dictatorship? It’s not. We’re already living in a dictatorship.”
I don’t even have to read it. Everything Obama does helps groups like the Muslim Bro’hood and/or moves us a step closer to the North American Union of Socialist Republics.
>>That will continue with Romney. It does not matter which one will be in office.
Obama is a communist. Romney is a “capitalism for the wealthy, socialism for the masses” guy. I’m not sure what you label that, but it seems to be the direction of the US under two republican and one democrat presidents from 1988 to 2008.
Obama hates white people. Romney seems to like white people.
Obama thinks America is evil. At worst, Romney thinks America is misguided.
America can survive a Romney presidency. It can’t survive another 4 years of ObaMao.
Romney is Obama lite. It’ll be the same commie carp just perhaps a bit slower. There is no longer a two party system.
“An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers,”
Somebody's view in 2005. This dog won't hunt now, not in Canada. It is absolute nonsense.
and America takes another one in the........
Memo to those who think that NOT suffering a vote for Mitt is better than having Obama for four more. Can anyone imagine; that Obama could/would usurp entire Constitution in time? Who has stopped him, thus far? The man has all but promised. And we know what he is capable of.
Who can safely, 'reasonably' doubt?
We have an actual voters list for every poll (precinct). When you show up to vote, you show ID and they cross off your name. The number of ballots used must equal the number of voters who showed up, in other words the number of names crossed off the voters list. We use paper ballots that are deposited in voting boxes. Scrutineers from all the political parties are present at all times. The votes are counted on site by the scrutineers, the results tallied, and the ballots are sealed up and sent to a central office. The process is simple. Fraud is virtually unknown and recounts are rare.
PING : “ - - - People need to know this. They need to know that this is and has been a complete coup, - - - “
Thanks for the ping!
Their ambition has always been that the US has to go to the United Nations to take a leak, and if you decide to defend yourself without written permission from the UN the destination shall be the World Court. I guess what they want to see is lots of blue helmets in your streets.
One World Government = United Nations, where a block of some 70+ muslim countries and a bunch of dictators call the shots.
Zero doesn’t represent the US, he represents the UN, and is probably on the verge of being annointed a future LEADER.
The other parties hold anti-Americanism as a basic tenet of their existence. At this point the Liberals are in the process of destroying themselves (they haven't had a real leader in years) and the NDP (socialists) have very little support outside of Quebec and very shallow support in Quebec. I can't see either of them forming a government. If they do, being anti-American will be a basic policy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.