Skip to comments.Adventures in Politicking II : No Shot
Posted on 05/27/2012 2:34:45 PM PDT by NaturalBornConservative
Repetitious Rhetoric vs. Genuine Policies
By: Larry Walker, Jr.
According to Barack Obama, the Presidents job is to make sure everyone has a fair shot." But as I explained in Part I, the United States Constitution declares that a Presidents real job is, to the best of his/her Ability, to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Whether or not Mr. Obama has abided by the true standard will soon be revealed, with the Supreme Courts ruling on Obamacare. However, when judged according to his self-contrived measure, based upon his job performance to-date, Mr. Obamas policies actually ensure that future generations of Americans will have no shot.
In my post entitled, Stimulus: How China Created 22.0 Million Jobs While Obama Squandered 3.3 Million, I compared the goals of the Chinese government to those of the Obama Administration. The reason Mr. Obamas stimulus plan fell short wasnt because the federal government didnt spend enough; Chinas two-year stimulus package cost an estimated $595.4 billion, while the Obama Administration spent more than $830 billion. The main reason the Obama-Plan faltered was because it didnt raise the bar high enough. You see, the Chinese government set a goal of reaching full employment, while the Obama Administration merely sought to create 3.5 million jobs, by January of 2011. The fact that Mr. Obama set a goal of creating just 3.5 million jobs, at a time when more than 15 million Americans were unemployed, is telling.
Mr. Obamas employment policies havent lived up to his self-contrived ideal of what a President should do. If a Presidents job is to make sure everyone has a fair shot, then why didnt Mr. Obama make full employment his objective? Wouldnt this have been more consistent with a fair shot, than squandering $800 billion to salvage a mere 3.5 million jobs, while leaving 11.5 million people on the sidelines, to make due on unemployment benefits, welfare and food stamps? Although his repeated use of the catchwords fair shot may play well in politicking, if he means that everyone should have an opportunity to participate in the economy, then Mr. Obama has failed.
According the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since December of 2008, a month before his inauguration, the Civilian Labor Force has declined by 261,000 (from 154,626,000 in December of 2008, to 154,365,000 by April of 2012). See chart below.
During the same time-frame, the Working Age Population (Civilian Noninstitutional Population) grew by 7,749,000 (from 235,035,000 in December of 2008, to 242,784,000 by April of 2012). See chart below.
So while the Working Age Population has grown by nearly 8 million, during Mr. Obamas term, the Labor Force has contracted by 261,000. Is the fact that nearly 8 million newly added Working Age Americans havent gotten a shot at participating in the economy, since Mr. Obama took the oath, consistent with his rhetoric? That depends on your definition of the catchphrase, to make sure everyone has a fair shot. Is no shot synonymous with a fair shot?
To top it off, the Number of Working Americans (Employment Level) has declined by 1,463,000 during Mr. Obamas term (from 143,328,000 in December of 2008, to 141,865,000 by April of 2012). See chart below.
Has Mr. Obama learned the lesson and since shifted his policies towards a goal of full employment? Not as far as we know. All we hear from him lately is that everyone should have a fair shot, pay their fair share of taxes, and play by the same rules, as if this hasnt always been the case.
Aside from repetitious rhetoric, what grand policy is Mr. Obama now promoting to advance his goal of fairness? Will the act of raising taxes on millionaires, and everyone else for that matter, open up new opportunities for the next generation? If so, how does that work? Will offering tax credits to small business owners that hire more workers and pay them higher wages, while simultaneously raising their tax rates, do the trick? Not in my opinion (see Obamas Economic Fallacy: The Not-To-Do List).
The Bottom Line: Since Mr. Obama believes that his job has been to make sure everyone has a fair shot, and since the Labor Force has declined by 261,000, while the Working Age Population has expanded by 7,749,000, and the number of Working Americans has fallen by 1,463,000, all since the beginning of his four-year reign, and since he has taken a pass on making full employment his goal, it may be concluded that what Mr. Obama really means by the expression, a fair shot, is no shot. However you slice it, Mr. Obama had his shot, and failed. He has no shot at reelection.
Adventures in Politicking I : A Presidents Job
Hope and Change on Ice
Manipulation 401 : U-3 vs Real Unemployment
To Give Americans a Fair Shot, Obama Should Stop Violating Our Rights
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.