http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=8379#8379
First one, with the eligibility statement.
Second one, withOUT the elegability statement.
.
Posted on 05/31/2012 8:12:58 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
Upon his investigation a Canadian journalist has concluded that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi submitted TWO DIFFERENT DNC documents attesting and/or pertaining to the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama in 2008.
The Canada Free Press’, JB WIlliams, obtained the two separate documents “prepared by Democrats to certify Barack Obama as their nominee for president in 2008 that suggest House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew there was an unresolved issue with his [Obama’] eligibility under the U.S. Constitution.”
The first verification contains the legal language stating both Obama and Joe Biden “are legally qualified to serve under the provision of the U.S. Constitution.” Nevertheless, the second document which was submitted to all fifty states “was missing the text CONCERNING THE ELIGIBILITY of Barack Hussein Obama.” (emphasis added).
While a same tell tale typo is in both of these official documents Pelosi signed off on, the actual legal language that Obama had eligibility is not in this second document Williams obtained!
Now, another very important notarized affidavit is surfacing in which senior election clerk Timothy Lee Adams on January 20, 2011, swore to the fact that his supervisor came to him and told him, using her Hawaiian dialect, that “Of course, there’s no birth certificate.
What?” He said she just said it to him and walked off. “She was quite a powerful lady.” Included in his affidavit, duly notarized, is the following: “Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii Long Form, hospital generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health, and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the (HI) government.”……
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
I KNEW THIS 4 YEARS AGO
The Hawaiian criminal enterprise will do whatever the larger criminal enterprise (read DNC inc) tells them to do. I’m just surprised they have yet to issue the fraudulent copy they were probably handed when little barry bastard commie’s attorneys flew over to HI just before the usurper ‘released’ his now famous fabricated composite! If Hawaii wants to be criminal to the core, what is going to happen to them for authorizing little barry bastard’s criminal fraud? Nothing, and they arrogantly flaunt this fact every time someone seeks the truth from their lying criminal org.
When this explodes, many Democrat officials in Hawaii, Illinois, and Washington, D. C. should be convicted of treason and jailed for the rest of their lives. This is a direct attack on our nation and its Constitution....that old document that every one of them swore to “uphold and defend.”
When the Democratic Party of Hawaii issued their Official Certification of Nomination for Kerry/Edwards, they included language stating that the two men were constitutionally eligible. The 2008 certification for 0bama/Biden contained no such language.
Pelosi, Obama and the rest of these socialist democrat frauds can run put they can’t hide any longer. Withholder will not prosecute because he was probably in it up to his neck. But any good prosecutor will have no trouble putting many high ranking socialist democrats, here and in Hawaii, in the clinker after the elections for this fraud on the american people. The leftists in the MSM should be embarassed by this fiasco, instead they are co-conspirators.
There’s really only one way for the commie bastards to put this to rest for good. In the not too distant future there will be a break in reported at the records department in Hawaii. Missing will be Barry’s hard copies and the film. The evil bastards will announce this tragedy with weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth and blame it on a right wing, birther, nut job (probably a white Hispanic). They’ll claim that since the documents simply corroborate what they’ve been telling us all along that they are useless to the right wing nut job bent on exposing a fraud that doesn’t exist so the stolen documents will probably just be destroyed; gone forever. Fake documents, supporting a fake man, lost in a fake burglary. End of story.
Sadly, that will not be the case. The euphemistically called ‘justice system’ now protects criminal behavior where it has political implications. ANd the criminal enterprise democrat party has seeded enough judges into the ‘justice system’ so that they can shop for the outcome on process they desire. The corruption in Hawaii is so institutionalized that they don’t even fear exposure now.
I’ve known for years that there exists a deep distrust and resentment towards Ha’oles in Hawaii. Even with this, they chose statehood. Why? Financial advantage? Revenge? Why join the US that they hate?
Another pattern I keep seeing is the Japanese sir names of the individuals in the Records department. Is there something going on here too? Can anyone in Hawaii enlighten me please?
Really? This was known 4 years ago before the election. It was even posted here on FR if I remember correctly. Just more evidence as to the lack of vetting by the media for the current occupier in the Oval Office
My sometimes rather “earthy” farmer Dad had a figure of speech to indicate his opinion that something would never go very far or make much of a difference: “It won’t amount to a pinch of shit!”
I have seen these little penny-ante expose’ deals come and go, and STILL nobody in the entire Country has had the stones to DO anything about it. Therefore, I’m going to emulate ol’ Dad and opine that neither will THIS revelation via Canada amount to even A PINCH, either!
Japanese SURNAMES is correct.
And BTW, you may be onto something. If, as Col. West claims, there are 80+ COMMUNISTS in the Congress of the United States, what would be surprising about a disloyal Japanese/Hawaiian mole here or there in the State gubmint? The way they have shucked and jived and obfuscated over this illegal alien in the white hut’s birth records, nothing would surprise me....other than if someone got to the bottom of the matter and actually DID something about it! THAT would surprise me!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=8379#8379
First one, with the eligibility statement.
Second one, withOUT the elegability statement.
.
Several researchers found it .. I thought they were duplicates, until my eye glanced over them and noted the difference in the amount of text. Then, it was clear they were different docs. I think the jbjd blog had a great deal of detail at that time, and information was sprouting all over the blogosphere .. and that’s likely where they were found.
Another blog reference then
But we’re wacko birthers don’tchaknow!
Lots of folks pick it apart word by word but very few actually understand the glaringly obvious motivation of the "Obama insertion."
It is actually getting hard to find and searches don't even locate MY original posts on FreeRepublic regarding this.
I did find this one.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2283753/posts?page=26#26 (ckilmer)
On April 10, 2008 Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduces Senate Resolution S. Res. 511 to “recognize that John Sidney McCain is a natural born citizen.” The resolution is allegedly meant to clarify that McCain is eligible to be President even though he was born in Panama. Because McCain’s parents were both Americans and he was born in Panama because his father was stationed there while in the military, existing law already covers McCain and he is eligible to be President. McCaskill’s resolution thus serves no purpose – except that language is included to try and provide a “blanket cover” for other foreign born candidates without military backgrounds, in order to enable Obama to be eligible to be President. This is the language that Obama inserted “Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President;” This Clause has no particular relevance to McCain [The language is inserted by Obama.][301,303]
301# http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/obama-born-in-kenya-new-information/#more-3844
303 # http://watchdog.net/b/us/110/sr511
Further searches on other word strings did locate an original post from 2008 addressing the Obama insertion in detail.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2105837/posts
Posted on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:13:02 PM by ransomnote
“2d Session S. RES. 511: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.: In the Senate of the United States.” was Sponsored by Senator McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy, Obama, Coburn, Clinton and Webb. Why? Why were Democratic Senators trying to pass a Resolution making Senator McCain undoubtedly Legally Eligible when this issue had already been cleared up in 2000 and again in 2004? And why did Senators McCaskill and Obama reportedly insert the following Clause?
“Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President;”
(Excerpt) Read more at texasdarlin.wordpress.com ...
The link no longer works.
I would suggest folks save the above links posts to a file, (web archive single File) as there is little available on Internet searches that refer to this.
.
They would have to build a couple of more jails to put all that know about this fraud that is in The White House.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.