Skip to comments.Who’s science and math do you buy? The EPA’s?
Posted on 06/05/2012 5:42:55 PM PDT by Mark Landsbaum
Government agencies, who have a vested interest in justifying what they spend, expanding what they do and making a case for more of both, are hardly disinterested parties.
Witness the EPA, that political entity dating to the Nixon Administration, which was created much like opening a Pandoras box. The unforeseen consequences continue to pour forth to degrees not even Rachel Carson could have imagined.
One of the short-comings of the mainstream media is that it swallows then regurgitates so much of what the government has to say about itself without bothering to critically examine, or even to seek out other views.
A recent case in point is . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at orangepunch.ocregister.com ...
Killing the EPA would save millions of people and trillions of dollars. Let’s not leave it for our children. KILL THE EPA!
At the EPA, there is no “science” and they only use “Jeopardy Math”.
That’s were they already know the answer they want, so there job is to back into the equation that produces that answer.
This has been ongoing for decades starting with DDT, continuing with Second Hand Smoke and most recently, with the phony Gorebull Warming Hoax and what they consider dangerous/pollutant Carbon Dioxide.
Well, ok, not the EPA,
but I also prefer usual
American spelling -
such as whose - instead of whos.....
ifthe epa ro any federal entity dod included sais the sun would rise in the east on wednesday i would wake up early to watch before i would belive them.
The EPA’s skill at turning gold into lead isn’t very useful.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.