Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEA "Speaking Out Against Drug Legalization" Claim 4 - a rebuttal
(self) | June 8, 2012 | (self)

Posted on 06/08/2012 12:53:33 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies

The DEA Web pages on "Speaking Out Against Drug Legalization" are linked with some regularity on FR. They're full of errors in fact and logic; since I couldn't find a comprehensive rebuttal online, I've started creating one. Here's my rebuttal to their "Fact 4;" more to come as time permits. ("Fact 1" rebutted at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2858443/posts; "Fact 2" rebutted at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2861557/posts; "Fact 3" rebutted at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2864032/posts.)

Claim 4. "Smoked marijuana is not scientifically approved medicine. Marinol, the legal version of medical marijuana, is approved by science."

  • Claim: Medical marijuana already exists. It’s called Marinol.

  • A pharmaceutical product, Marinol, is widely available through prescription. It comes in the form of a pill and is also being studied by researchers for suitability via other delivery methods, such as an inhaler or patch. The active ingredient of Marinol is synthetic THC, which has been found to relieve the nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy for cancer patients and to assist with loss of appetite with AIDS patients.

    Facts: "The poor solubility of Marinol in aqueous solutions and its high first-pass metabolism in the liver account for its poor bioavailability; only 10-20% of an oral dose reaches the systemic circulation. The onset of action is slow; peak plasma concentrations are not attained until two to four hours after dosing. In contrast, inhaled marijuana is rapidly absorbed. In a study comparing THC administered orally, by inhalation, and intravenously, plasma concentration peaked almost instantaneously after both inhalation and intravenous administration" ( http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6376&page=203)

    Several other cannabinoid chemicals available in marijuana - but absent from Marinol - have also been clinically demonstrated to possess therapeutic value. Clinical data indicate that the interaction of these compounds is likely more effictive than synthetic THC alone.

  • Claim: Unlike smoked marijuana—which contains more than 400 different chemicals, including most of the hazardous chemicals found in tobacco smoke— Marinol has been studied and approved by the medical community and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nation’s watchdog over unsafe and harmful food and drug products. Since the passage of the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act, any drug that is marketed in the United States must undergo rigorous scientific testing. The approval process mandated by this act ensures that claims of safety and therapeutic value are supported by clinical evidence and keeps unsafe, ineffective, and dangerous drugs off the market.

    Fact: This very same DEA page admits that comprehensive, scientifically rigorous study of marijuana has been done - see below.

  • Claim: There are no FDA-approved medications that are smoked. For one thing, smoking is generally a poor way to deliver medicine. It is difficult to administer safe, regulated dosages of medicines in smoked form. Secondly, the harmful chemicals and carcinogens that are byproducts of smoking create entirely new health problems. There are four times the level of tar in a marijuana cigarette, for example, than in a tobacco cigarette.

    Fact: See what the Institute of Medicine says below.

  • Claim: Morphine, for example, has proven to be a medically valuable drug, but the FDA does not endorse the smoking of opium or heroin. Instead, scientists have extracted active ingredients from opium, which are sold as pharmaceutical products like morphine, codeine, hydrocodone or oxycodone. In a similar vein, the FDA has not approved smoking marijuana for medicinal purposes, but has approved the active ingredient-THC in the form of scientifically regulated Marinol.

    Fact: See above on the deficiencies of Marinol.

  • Claim: The DEA helped facilitate the research on Marinol. The National Cancer Institute approached the DEA in the early 1980s regarding their study of THC’s in relieving nausea and vomiting. As a result, the DEA facilitated the registration and provided regulatory support and guidance for the study.

    Fact: Despite the DEA's complete lack of expertise in medical research. The DEA's "facilitation, support, and guidance" was only needed because the DEA was getting in the way in the first place.

    Claim: California, researchers are studying the potential use of marijuana and its ingredients on conditions such as multiple sclerosis and pain. At this time, however, neither the medical community nor the scientific community has found sufficient data to conclude that smoked marijuana is the best approach to dealing with these important medical issues.

    Fact: See what the Institute of Medicine says below.

  • Claim: The most comprehensive, scientifically rigorous review of studies of smoked marijuana was conducted by the Institute of Medicine, an organization chartered by the National Academy of Sciences. In a report released in 1999, the Institute did not recommend the use of smoked marijuana, but did conclude that active ingredients in marijuana could be isolated and developed into a variety of pharmaceuticals, such as Marinol.

    Fact: Here's what the Institute of Medicine's comprehensive, scientifically rigorous report actually says: "for certain patients, such as the terminally ill or those with debilitating symptoms, the long-term risks are not of great concern. [...] it will likely be many years before a safe and effective cannabinoid delivery system, such as an inhaler, is available for patients. In the meantime there are patients with debilitating symptoms for whom smoked marijuana might provide relief. [...] Until a nonsmoked rapid-onset cannabinoid drug delivery system becomes available, we acknowledge that there is no clear alternative for people suffering from chronic conditions that might be relieved by smoking marijuana, such as pain or AIDS wasting." ( http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6376&page=7 and page 8)

  • Claim: In the meantime, the DEA is working with pain management groups, such as Last Acts, to make sure that those who need access to safe, effective pain medication can get the best medication available.

    Fact: The DEA is also making sure that some treatments remain unavailable - even by prescription.



TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: cannabis; dea; drugs; drugwar; marijuana; marinol; medpot; pot; warondrugs; wod; wodlist; wosd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: AlmaKing
Personally I'm waiting for recombinant DNA technology to take care of the problem ~ and that deal with the cancer causing MJ in England suggests that might well be a done deal.

Smoke 'em while ya' got 'em.

21 posted on 06/09/2012 5:06:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-18283689

Already posted and rebutted here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2892457/posts

Like many medicines, cannabis has harmful side effects. Cannabis, alcohol, tobacco, and bacon double cheeseburgers are all bad for one's health - why should that be reason to ban only the first?

22 posted on 06/09/2012 2:40:51 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
You're too kind.
23 posted on 06/09/2012 2:47:43 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
Did I say to ban anything? I say this, if it gives you cancer and you like it, do more of it. Be my guest, but don't expect me to vote for ObamaKKKare.

You are on your own.

24 posted on 06/09/2012 5:34:27 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AlmaKing

I suppose you can legalize MJ provided you also have a Stand Your Ground law. Absent SYG, MJ is fair game for restriction.


25 posted on 06/09/2012 5:36:49 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Did I say to ban anything?

So you're opposed to the marijuana ban? Glad to hear it1

don't expect me to vote for ObamaKKKare.

You are on your own.

Nobody said a word about Obamacare. Are you having some sort of psychotic break?

26 posted on 06/09/2012 6:04:26 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I suppose you can legalize MJ provided you also have a Stand Your Ground law. Absent SYG, MJ is fair game for restriction.

That settles it - you are having a psychotic break. Maybe medical marijuana would help.

27 posted on 06/09/2012 6:06:23 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

Better you provide me with my government supplied firearms ~ suitable for use in the militia (that way it can be liberal or conservative, and still a gun eh).


28 posted on 06/09/2012 6:24:21 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
Interestingly, the DEA has pulled the Web version of these pages from their Web site. You can still find them at http://web.archive.org/web/20110528164246/http://www.justice.gov/dea/demand/speakout/index.html.
29 posted on 09/13/2012 1:50:44 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Rebuttal to “Fact 5” at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2932390/posts


30 posted on 09/17/2012 10:51:37 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson