Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House GOP Still Flailing Around on Pension Reform
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 6/7/2012 | Jack McHugh

Posted on 06/08/2012 12:56:03 PM PDT by MichCapCon

Michigan House Republicans have so far failed to say "yes" to a Senate-passed bill that would close the school pension system to new employees and instead offer them a generous 401(k) plan.

The failure is based on a concern promoted by teachers unions and state pension bureaucrats that if the system is closed, then accounting rules require allocating hundreds of millions of dollars over several years to "front load" the amortization of unfunded pension liabilities.

Ironically, these new converts to the "holy writ" of accounting rules were all but silent during 10 years of serial pension-rule violations by this state in the form of persistent annual underfunding of the school retirement system. All that contribution low-balling is a major reason taxpayers here now carry a burden of $22 billion in unfunded pension liabilities, or some $6,000 per Michigan family (pension fund investment returns not meeting expectations is the largest reason). In only two of the past 10 years has the state met or exceeded a "required annual contribution" to the pension system. In most years the shortfall was 10 to 28 percent.

Given the incentives inherent in all government pension systems, it would be foolish to expect unfunded liabilities not to grow even more in the future. This is why closing the system to new employees is the single most important reform Michigan could make right now.

Nevertheless, rather than leaping to say "yes" to the Senate-passed bill doing just that, some in the House Republican caucus have bought into the union and the "pension industrial complex" claims that doing so requires coming up with hundreds of millions of dollars almost immediately to "catch up" more quickly on all that past underfunding.

It doesn't, and in any event the House has already found a better answer to a genuine concern those false claims exploit: The money to "catch up" on unfunded pension liabilities has to come from somewhere. The House proposes doing this with a simple change in the formula for allocating those "catch-up" costs to future school district budgets.

There is zero chance that Michigan won't meet its obligation to future retirees, and everyone knows it. The bad faith arguments being made by a special interest with zero credibility on the issue aren't about accounting rules, but instead are part of a campaign to halt a transformational reform: Making Michigan just the second state in the nation to place itself on a glide path to eventual elimination of government employee legacy costs.*

House Republicans should say "yes" to the Senate and stop listening to people who have good reasons to mislead them.

* A State Police pension system would remain open, but this is tiny compared to the system for school employees and the one for state employees (which was closed to new hires in 1997). Separate municipal pension systems would also remain open. But the magnitude of these bits of uncompleted business pales in comparison to the acheivement that having closed both the state and school employee pension systems to new members would represent.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: michigan; pension

1 posted on 06/08/2012 12:56:15 PM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Don’t know what they’re afraid of.

The very first thing any Michigander does after qualifying for his big, fat union pension is to pack-up and move to Florida.

None of them will be around to vote against the Pubbies for cutting this.


2 posted on 06/08/2012 2:25:35 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Some states and locales have already cut pensions for employees who are new/future hires as their answer to the problem.

The best answer is default: the only way to shut the robbers down for good and all.


3 posted on 06/08/2012 2:40:17 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

I have heard the calling to confiscate 401k plans to supplement and shore up social security. I have a better idea... confiscate the funds in the public union pension plans and roll then into social security.. don’t worry public employees, your money will be there when you are 62 years old, just like my money will be there....


4 posted on 06/08/2012 2:41:56 PM PDT by joe fonebone (I am the 15%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson