CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE ANALYSIS
We all know that Obama should never have been POTUS for more than one reason and that he was put there not by the voters but by people like Soros.
posted on 06/15/2012 5:10:15 AM PDT
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
Hawaii has fake documents in their files, If they have an exact copy of the fake Obama posted. Hawaii should be ashamed to participate in such a poorly conducted and obvious fraud. It’s lazy, poorly done, half-witted, like everything else about Obama, who is nothing more than an embarrassing, Affirmative Action cliché. The State of Hawaii should not stoop to the level of our unprincipled, mainstream media.
posted on 06/15/2012 7:45:33 AM PDT
The most important piece of information is missing from that document:
the Date of Birth.
Repeal Hawaii’s statehood and backdate it.
To: SeekAndFind; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...
Note that this carefully worded statement does not say that the Bennett copy is identical in appearance to the original record. Nor does it even say that the information in the Bennett copy is identical to the information on the original record. It says "information ... matches." This could mean matching in a generic sense, where the meaning is the same but the wording is not. Or it could indicate that the information on the Bennett copy (the forgery) is a subset of what's on the original record (the forgery has less data), or a superset (the forgery has additional data).
When somebody signs and dates a legal document, customarily a single pen is used throughout -- not three different pens.
What if I am wrong about this? In that case, there are two possibilities: (1) there is no substantive difference in information between the forgery and the real birth certificate in the Hawaii Department of Health file cabinet, and the White House released the forgery to "screw with the birthers"; or (2) the scam is a wider conspiracy involving more people than just employees of the White House -- likely including compromised Hawaii Department of Health employees -- and we can't be at all sure what really is on the genuine birth certificate.
posted on 06/15/2012 11:52:52 PM PDT
by Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
posted on 06/16/2012 2:08:09 AM PDT
("I'm not concerned about the very poor." -- severely conservative Mitt 'Etch-A-Sketch' Rmoney)
Sorry, but I find the author’s quite well-researched conclusion to be absurd.
Obama and his handlers have spent millions to keep whatever is in Hawaii’s files secret.
Hushing up an out-of-wedlock birth simply isn’t worth that kind of money.
He as much as admitted they were never married in the book Ayres ghostwrote for him. And remember Michelle’s comment that Stanley Ann was “very single when she had him”?
Suppose an authentic birth certificate were to surface that said what his author proposes. It would not matter in this age of loose morals when 40% of births in the country are out-of-wedlock, and most among those most likely to vote for him.
The author also accepts as fact some things that are most assuredly open to question, like the name of the birthing hospital(if he was actually born in a hospital).
Nope. Not buying it.
posted on 06/16/2012 6:53:16 PM PDT
Butterdezillion has verified in a round about way that his records have been amended. I suspect two name changes. Adoption to Soetoro to become Indonesian, then back to Obama. He is hiding the legal adoption and loss of citizenship.
posted on 06/17/2012 3:22:56 AM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson