Skip to comments.Will Romney go the sheepish way of John McCain?
Posted on 06/17/2012 9:07:34 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Will Romney go the way of loser John McCain who was so polite he refused to let supporters go after Obamas alleged lack of Natural Born Citizenship status as required by Article II, Section 1 of our Constitution? Talk show host Michael Savage certainly thinks thats what is going on!
Romney is taking a position similar to that which McCains advisors talked him into in his failed 2008 challenge to Barack Obama, that being an absolute refusal to call out a president who cannot, will not produce authentic documents average citizens need to just get a drivers license.
Savage said Romney is being run off the rails by the same bad advice McCain was given. Advisors . . . want him to lose, Savage told his listeners this week. The Establishment wants Romney to lose.
In the false axiom to provide fairness, the elites who control both parties want the Dems to have 8 years because the GOP had their eight, to play out the childhood saying of Turn About is Fair Play! (1)
Savage was astounded that Romney disavow[ed] the Super Pacs attempt to...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Romney claimed he could not prevent the super pac attacks againt Newt. He even claimed he never viewed them BUT he disavowed the super pac attacks on Obama and his connection to Rev. Wright. Go figure.
Anybody who astounds Savage is all right with me.
Anyway, Romney wants to win the election, so he won’t take bad advice from a misnamed blog.
Not necessarily. We are talking about a person who is a chronic liar, a druggie, probably a sexual degenrate who long ago sold his soul and is an affirmative action product of our twisted society and he has never ‘earned’ anything in his life that required work and delayed gratification. even the circumstances of the ‘autobiographies’ smell of his procrastinating until someone elese di it for him. If he has been lying his whole life, he would try to maintain the fraudulent persona he created long before the books were written. That shcuk and jive laziness is also one of the characteristics the commies profiled for recruiting shills and American treacherous agents.
Of course Romney is going to fold. Isn't he the GOPE (liberal) pick?
Whatever Romney gets, it won't be with a majority of the conservative base and if he can win without that - he's a better man than I.
If you tell a lie BIG enough people will believe it- Joseph Stalin
By your logic, what would be the motive for a Honolulu newspaper to print a birth announcement back in the 1960s?
Sometimes mistakes are just mistakes.
If you don’t know the answer to your question you have not been paying attention. It was a common practice at the time for those wanting to make newborns Americans, so to speak.
I haven’t seen much evidence of sheepishness in Romney, not in the primaries, when I wish he would have had some, nor now, when I would like him to rip Obama a new one, and then do it all over again, repeating until Obama is back with his Chicago mob, or better yet, off to Kenya to be a rising political star in African politics.
Yeah, Romney sickens me sometimes, but I’m still voting for him.I hope that everyone else on FR will as well. But the guy doesn’t have to disavow anything that a Superpac does. In fact, if I had the bucks to run a Superpac, I’d ignore Milt and say what needs to be said about the Marxist Punk anyway. Bob
Sadly, yes. We are going to fall because of half-measures and this maddening timidness on the part of our leadership.
The grandparents put it in. 1961 was not Pony Express days. But the long form image of the b/c is a fraud. I’m sure that the doctor signed his name with a smiley face! It doesn’t matter much at this point, except if he used his Kenyan birth to become a foreign exchange student, with the concomitant benefits entailed. Bob
The premise of the article is stupid. The idea that the best / only / most courageous place to attack Obama is on the issue of birth is just ridiculous. There are many areas to attack boldly, and frankly, Mitt is doing better than I feared he would.
I do not know for sure where Obama was born, but I do know for sure where he is a foreigner - in his heart and mind - where he hates America - and we are much better off removing him for what he believes than for where he was born. I’m all for removing him for any reason whatsoever, but it is the liberal belief system that needs to be defeated.
A birth certificate issue simply will not do that.
Over the past several years Obama's fraud has become more and more obvious. His administration is very worried about it or they wouldn't have gambled on a poorly forged long form. That long form could still end up being his undoing. I am anxiously waiting to see what else Sheriff Arpaio's Posse has found.
It is the blatant disregard for the rule of law that tears at me. Our "President" is a fraud. It has been proved that his official narrative is a complete fabrication. I am completely astonished that there are so many people who apparently only care about the political ramifications and say we shouldn't worry about the crime that has been committed. Even many of Obama's supporters have to acknowledge that his stories don't add up. Obama is constantly contradicting himself.
(sarc) But I am sure you are right... he got away with it fair and square when he was sworn in... twice... Nothing to see here lets just move on. (/sarc)
"Narrative" is a favorite word of the liberals. It isn't concerned with facts.
I agree, the debate over Obama’s birth ended when he was sworn in. We could come up with a photo of 1day old Obama it could show in the background it was not Hawaii, it would not matter. He was sworn in. He was not vetted.
As for the other question, will Mitt fight?
I think the Mitt Campaign has shown allot of fight. Since he has sewn up the GOP race, he has taken the fight to Obama, he has jumped on Obama’s gaffes and all the bad news that has hit the Obama White House.
I have seen more fight in the last two weeks of Mitt’s Campaing than I have seen in the entire McLame campaign 4 years ago.
Mitt’s is the sheepish path; no question. . .
Yes “narrative”... what a word. It is lawyer speak isn’t it? You are absolutely right, in the liberal mindset there is no requirement that a “narrative” is factual. Because what is truth anyway... The movie “Pearl Harbor” is more “true” to most of us than the memories of those who were actually there.
I don't know about disavowing, but the candidate can't be seen controlling the SuperPac.
So the only one reading something into it is Savage, who seems to buy into more conspiracy theories than the maximum allowed for a sane person...
Believe me...I am convinced. Sad isn’t it?
I wish romney would hammer obozo on his college transcripts and ask what he is hiding.
I think that is were the problem lies for obozo and that he got loans and grants for being a FORIEGN Student and had lousy grades, alos the SSI number he used then and the one he uses now could be differant.
The birth issue is old news to most people.
Is this the same Michael Savage who donated $5000 to Jerry Brown’s 2006 CA AG campaign? Also the same Michael Savage who one day would sing the praises of President Bush, and the very next day attempt to cut President Bush’s legs out from under him? Michael Savage is, at the very least, suffering from bi-polar disorder.
I think Mitt wants to win one for his dad so this might give him the fire in his belly to step away from his nice guy persona when he has to.
In every stump speech Romney has been SCATHING on our Dear Leader and his failed policies. Just one of his speeches hits Obama harder than all of McCain’s combined. Like him or not, Romney plays hardball.
Not that he is 'much' less that the picture this gives; but he is more reasonable; and he is not wanting America to be the 'low man' on the totum pole; which is where, Obama believes, we belong.
When Mitt can say that Obama is a Marxist/Leninist et al. . .and give name to Obama's 'Change' for WHAT IT IS. . .then we will see a real Leader who is not afraid to speak the truth.
Showing no fear by 'just 'asking' mind you - 'why it is' that Obama has a Connecticut Social Security number - that belonged to a 'citizen' in the l890's - would reassure, that we had a Leader, one that is not cowed by political correctness.
And one more; have Mitt 'speak' to the Fort Hood TERRORIST Et Al debaucle; so we can see again; authentic concern for our Military and serious recognition of our enemies at hand. (Does/can. . .Mitt say 'terrorist'?)
Imagine the campaign against George Bush; if his credentials were those of Obama. . .he would not have a 'fighting chance'. And in truth; Obama should not either. Nor ever. . . Lead on, Mitt; please. . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.