Skip to comments.Another Ridiculous Lie From Liberal Media – Distorting Romney’s “WAWAs” Hoagie Speech
Posted on 06/18/2012 4:45:20 PM PDT by radioone
Another example of how ridiculous the media is in their uncompromising struggle to distort the truth in order to make sure Obama wins and Conservatives lose.
Today its being widely reported that Romney had a moment were he was amazed at the existence of WAWAs, a convenience/gas store, and the electronic touchtone ordering of sandwiches. They have spun this to make it seem like hes out of touch BUT THE VIDEO IS EDITED DECEPTIVELY:
(Excerpt) Read more at soopermexican.com ...
The MSM can report on him what he says, what he does, his record and have plenty of fodder..good grief there is no need to lie about the man or his family.
Romney, the GOPe’s RINO coward HIDES and lets his wife
and the DNC control the media.
Mr. RomneyCARE, if he was a Conservative, would
be attacking the criminal Obama administration, but
no, Mr. RomneyCARE has the exact same policies as Obama,
from RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE to globalwarming.
And the libs introducing the deceptively edited video were unaware of the deception (a rhetorical question)? And notice how smug were their smirks.
But there's no real story here (just like there wasn't really one with Bush).
The Huffington Post is trying to go after him for saying "WaWa's" instead of "WaWa," but everybody does that.
WTH is a “WaWa”?
Convenience Stores in Philadelphia area. Like 7-11 but speak English.
Conservatives will lose even if Romney wins.
I saw my first WaWa’s driving through Kissimmee, FL on Saturday.
I know I was surprised.
Just shows how “out of touch” I am LOL
Are you working to reelect President Obama?
100 times better than 7-11!
I hate ordering sandwiches that way. Every place i’ve done it at the food is low quality and blows.
I agree. Probably should have made a better comparison.
I understand. Totally.
From my perspective, everybody loses if Romney wins, too. Consider that Romney is entirely on-board with the environmentalist agenda, an agenda which has already decayed considerable of our energy and food production; it is every bit as lethal and shackling as nationalized health care. Romney's mindset is that of an authoritarian liberal, issue to issue. He would resent and punish any conservative efforts to "hold his feet to the fire" because he is a liberal, and moderates in Congress, with the GOPe, would back him. Truly, the prospects with Romney are different, but just as destructive as Obama.
If it's O v R, we're faced with the cold fact that unless we get a miracle, either president is going to be an active enemy of limited government, and without a champion for limited government, everybody loses.
I figured from the start there was a pretty good chance Romney would get the nomination for 2012, in part because I knew he cheats, so this scenario is something I've been pondering for awhile. Our votes as conservatives are powerless to avoid an authoritarian statist presidency no matter who we vote for, even if it's third party (unless we have a mircacle, and they do happen). Labeling Romney an "authoritarian statist" is absolutely accurate, by the way.
Romney offends every wisdom on both the moral and the limited government fronts. For me, Romney is as off the table as voting for Obama. Both common sense and morality make it so. Yet I have a duty to vote.
I hope and pray that enough go third-party to split the results into a plurality where the winner only gets a little more than a third of the vote. He would enter office on the defensive and politically vulnerable to his enemies in his own party as well as the other party.
Heard about this on the Red Eye radio show last night with Harley and McNamara. They called it crap journalism. I guess that makes Andrea Mitchell a crap journalist.