[AU72]

Chief Justice Roberts rocks!

[xkaydet65]

This gives the Left a chance to yell activist. While I see the result as a good, how does a conservative court or justice make a ruling on an issue that was not argued before the Court? This recalls Scott v Sanford. Sanford’s lawyers argued that Scott had no standing to bring suit. Taney and the majority could have stopped there but they went far beyond. Denying black citizenship and overturning both the Missouri Compromise and Popular Sovereignty regarding slavery.

[FlingWingFlyer]

“Sotomayor blasted...” ROTFL! I wonder what she’d be doing for a living if Barry hadn’t give her this sham job on the Supreme Court.

[Psycho_Bunny]

“Sotomayor blasted the majority for reaching out to decide issues that had not been briefed or argued before the court “

lol...k, n00b.

[PubliusMM]

“The court weighed in on the fight over the rights of public employee unions...”

That is the essence of the progressive, marxist mindset...the unions have rights that supersede the rights of the PEOPLE who make up the membership of the union.
Only in Libtardia does that make sense.

[microgood]

Sotomayor blasted the majority for reaching out to decide issues that had not been briefed or argued before the court

Baloney. The union stance is that they will just take the money and force you to get it back via lawsuit. Opt-out enables that even more. The court was striking down the union hardball tactics resulting in violation of people's 1st Amendment. They are basically restoring their rights in a tangible rather than theoretical way.

[Boogieman]

Requiring dues from non-members is racketeering, plain and simple.