Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Party says Obama doesn't HAVE to be eligible to serve as President
Coach is Right ^ | 6/23/2012 | Doug Book

Posted on 06/23/2012 10:04:29 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax

Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their boy at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Democrat Party has finally admitted Barack Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States– and that it doesn’t matter.

According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.” (1)

In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that...

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: barackobama; birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; constitution; cultureofcorruption; democratparty; democratscandals; michaelmalihi; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamawasntvetted; tennessee; worldisgoingbonkers

1 posted on 06/23/2012 10:04:42 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

A person who is not Constitutionally qualified to be President can run for the office, but may not serve. That was established in the lawsuits surrounding Eldridge Cleaver’s nomination as the Peace and Freedom Party Presidential candidate at the age of 31.


2 posted on 06/23/2012 10:08:18 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

oh THAT argument should do well when it reaches the Supreme Court


3 posted on 06/23/2012 10:09:12 AM PDT by evad (STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING. It's the SPENDING Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Democrats have slipped the tethers of reality. Look for an editorial on this topic.


4 posted on 06/23/2012 10:14:51 AM PDT by Lazamataz (People who resort to Godwin's Law are just like Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

And, people want to know what’s wrong with America?


5 posted on 06/23/2012 10:19:33 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Pelosism: open defiance, we do what we want.


6 posted on 06/23/2012 10:20:03 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

So they nominate Obama Jr (Hillary)?


7 posted on 06/23/2012 10:20:27 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

When good men do nothing.


8 posted on 06/23/2012 10:22:32 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Proof-positive that Democrats are Un-American.


9 posted on 06/23/2012 10:26:03 AM PDT by lbryce (BHO-"Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds by way of Trinity, NM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

No way.

Yu want to talk about an up-rising!


10 posted on 06/23/2012 10:28:27 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (Criminaliens or Crimigrants...0bamao's people? Answer: Evidently yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Of course we Democrats can have Ahmadinejad for President if we want it! We Wants it!! The precious!


11 posted on 06/23/2012 10:29:53 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (nobody gives me warheads anyway))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
So they nominate Obama Jr (Hillary)?

Nope. Chelsea Clinton.

12 posted on 06/23/2012 10:30:11 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their boy at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Democrat Party has finally admitted Barack Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States– and that it doesn’t matter.

Two things wrong with the bolded text - (1) NO ONE, Dem, 'Pubbie, or Independent Martian peanut farmer has EVER had to defend zero's eligibility in court. In every single challange to his eligibility, the courts have dismissed the plaintiff as having no standing to bring the action to court prior to ever getting to opening arguments or pre-trial motions, therefore, no one has ever had to defend his eligibility in court. (2) Use of the term "boy" in reference to 0bama is a poor choice of words since the morons in the Dem Party will use that terminology as proof that 'Pubbies, conservatives and anyone else who opposes zero being president is only doing so because they are racists. As much as I hate playing the liberals' PC games, in this sense, we should be careful how we refer to the ineligible Kenyan fraud.

According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.” (1)

The first part of that statement is true - the Tennesee Democrat Party DOES have the right to nominate anyone they choose. HOWEVER . . . . . . . . . the Constitution (which, in a surprise twist to the Democrats, is NOT a living document!) provides very clear requirements for anyone wishing to be president of the United States and SPECIFICALLY lists the eligibility requirements.

So, the Tennessee Democrat Party as well as the Democrat Party as a hole (typo intentional!) need to attend the Hillsdale College lecture series on the Constitution to learn about or refresh their knowledge of the Constitution. Until something changes (over MY dead body!!), the Cnstitution is STILL the law of the land and it applies equally to us all, REGARDLESS of party affiliation!!

13 posted on 06/23/2012 10:32:24 AM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

A full blown people’s raid on the nation’s capital with pitchforks is the only thing that can save this nation. And that’s not going to happen.


14 posted on 06/23/2012 10:33:13 AM PDT by Terry Mross (To My Liberal Kinfolk: Don't call, email or write until you've gotten your brain fixed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Up to now they are correct.


15 posted on 06/23/2012 10:34:08 AM PDT by tsowellfan (Should Obama recuse himself from making any decisions on immigration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
John Boehner sees no problem with Obama’s eligibility.
16 posted on 06/23/2012 10:35:41 AM PDT by tsowellfan (Should Obama recuse himself from making any decisions on immigration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
Obama doesn't HAVE to be eligible to serve as President

A little egg on the faces of the anti-birther republicans right about now.

17 posted on 06/23/2012 10:38:38 AM PDT by tsowellfan (Should Obama recuse himself from making any decisions on immigration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Just a “little” however, he is still in office so the job is not done.

Until you can find a court with the GUTS to rule on this case it’s gonna go no where.

That is a sad fact because I do not believe he is eligible to hold the office given the facts presented.


18 posted on 06/23/2012 10:49:51 AM PDT by cableguymn (If your policies are pushing the economy in to headwinds.. TURN YOUR POLICY AROUND!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
>"Democrat Party says Obama doesn't HAVE to be eligible to serve as President"

GOP Agrees!

19 posted on 06/23/2012 10:55:33 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
I do not believe he is eligible to hold the office given the facts presented.

I agree with you about "the facts presented". But the very fact that he has not provided proof of eligibility should have been enough to consider him ineligible. Sad state we're in in this country.

If Congress took this issue seriously I do think we would be seeing Nancy Pelosi facing prison time. She confirmed him as eligible without any verification.

20 posted on 06/23/2012 10:56:41 AM PDT by tsowellfan (Should Obama recuse himself from making any decisions on immigration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

wasn’t there a song...LIARS, TRAMPS & THIEVES...that seems to apply to the democratic party extraordinaire!
maybe we should make their theme song!


21 posted on 06/23/2012 11:05:03 AM PDT by conservativesister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

By that thinking, I should run my cat and dare them to say an animal can’t be POTUS.


22 posted on 06/23/2012 11:19:31 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax; Revolting cat!; Slings and Arrows
According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.” (1)

And here I thought the guy with the hundred pound scrotum had the biggest ball this week.

23 posted on 06/23/2012 11:26:51 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The media ignored the 40th anniversary of Bill Ayers' Pentagon bombing but not Watergate. Ask Why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

But Republican senate and house critters are not much better for allowing this crap to continue, unchallenged.

Too many PUBs had a hand in getting Obama elected or did not do enough to prevent it — and I am not just talking about GW, Cheney and McClown.

The latter three could have fully identified Obama and his ineligibility but DID NOTHING.


24 posted on 06/23/2012 12:04:36 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

That’s a crying shame.


25 posted on 06/23/2012 12:07:03 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

“....including someone who is not qualified for the office.” (1)

.
We’re not talking about qualification — most of the people we elect to be POTUS are not qualified.

We are talking about ELIGIBILITY!


26 posted on 06/23/2012 12:12:58 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

That’s all the Democrats have. They have known from the beginning that he is not elligible to serve according to the Constitution of the United States of America. They did not spend millions in legal defense motions to keep him in office for nothing. He is not elligible or he would have proved it by now. He was, as his grandmother said, born in Kenya and she was there to witness it. Do you not think it stange that you have not seen a birth certificate?


27 posted on 06/23/2012 12:29:48 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

“She confirmed him as eligible without any verification.”

There are also two copies of the Colorado “Official Certification of Nomination” document with Obama and Biden named and signed by Pelosi and the DNC secretary. They are both notarized and dated 8/28/08.

The second one has a stamped mark saying it was received 8/29/08. It also has the phrase “the following candidates are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” REMOVED.

I downloaded copies of these from a news article, but I do not have a way post them.


28 posted on 06/23/2012 12:41:26 PM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Republican senate and house critters are not much better for allowing this crap to continue, unchallenged. Too many PUBs had a hand in getting Obama elected or did not do enough to prevent it — and I am not just talking about GW, Cheney and McClown. The latter three could have fully identified Obama and his ineligibility but DID NOTHING.

Think "Rubio."

29 posted on 06/23/2012 1:09:12 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Oh, Boehner. Now there’s a tough, principled guy. </sarc>


30 posted on 06/23/2012 1:28:05 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

There they go, “deeming” again.


31 posted on 06/23/2012 1:40:15 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Local CCL class tomorrow 8:00 am

Check this one out !!

32 posted on 06/23/2012 1:49:38 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
If Congress took this issue seriously I do think we would be seeing Nancy Pelosi facing prison time. She confirmed him as eligible without any verification.

Why?
It appears that if just her statement makes it valid, she could confirm her dog as eligible.

The ones who matter and have standing never challenged it.

33 posted on 06/23/2012 2:09:09 PM PDT by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

So, now birthers were right but they are coming out of the closet after the law is changed politically... typical.


34 posted on 06/23/2012 2:12:30 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
“Until you can find a court with the GUTS to rule on this case it’s gonna go no where.”

Today was the deadline given by the Florida judge in the case to remove Obama’s name from the Florida General Election Ballot. Is there any news on this case?
35 posted on 06/25/2012 2:46:45 PM PDT by Yulee (Village of Albion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TBP
[ A person who is not Constitutionally qualified to be President can run for the office, but may not serve. That was established in the lawsuits surrounding Eldridge Cleaver’s nomination as the Peace and Freedom Party Presidential candidate at the age of 31. ]

This looks like a job for:

JOE BIDEN!!!!

So has Biden actually been president these last 3-1/2 years?

That sounds so nice...

So would Joe have to re-sign all those executive orders? Or has he been signing them all along....

36 posted on 06/27/2012 10:54:48 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Lord Monkton is right, A lawyer of a client screwed over by an Obama executive order needs to get case thrown out based of lack of proof of legitimacy.


37 posted on 06/27/2012 10:56:16 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson