Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Party says Obama doesn't HAVE to be eligible to serve as President
Coach is Right ^ | 6/23/2012 | Doug Book

Posted on 06/23/2012 10:04:29 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax

Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their boy at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Democrat Party has finally admitted Barack Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States– and that it doesn’t matter.

According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.” (1)

In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that...

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: barackobama; birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; constitution; cultureofcorruption; democratparty; democratscandals; michaelmalihi; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamawasntvetted; tennessee; worldisgoingbonkers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Oldpuppymax

wasn’t there a song...LIARS, TRAMPS & THIEVES...that seems to apply to the democratic party extraordinaire!
maybe we should make their theme song!


21 posted on 06/23/2012 11:05:03 AM PDT by conservativesister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

By that thinking, I should run my cat and dare them to say an animal can’t be POTUS.


22 posted on 06/23/2012 11:19:31 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax; Revolting cat!; Slings and Arrows
According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.” (1)

And here I thought the guy with the hundred pound scrotum had the biggest ball this week.

23 posted on 06/23/2012 11:26:51 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The media ignored the 40th anniversary of Bill Ayers' Pentagon bombing but not Watergate. Ask Why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

But Republican senate and house critters are not much better for allowing this crap to continue, unchallenged.

Too many PUBs had a hand in getting Obama elected or did not do enough to prevent it — and I am not just talking about GW, Cheney and McClown.

The latter three could have fully identified Obama and his ineligibility but DID NOTHING.


24 posted on 06/23/2012 12:04:36 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

That’s a crying shame.


25 posted on 06/23/2012 12:07:03 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

“....including someone who is not qualified for the office.” (1)

.
We’re not talking about qualification — most of the people we elect to be POTUS are not qualified.

We are talking about ELIGIBILITY!


26 posted on 06/23/2012 12:12:58 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

That’s all the Democrats have. They have known from the beginning that he is not elligible to serve according to the Constitution of the United States of America. They did not spend millions in legal defense motions to keep him in office for nothing. He is not elligible or he would have proved it by now. He was, as his grandmother said, born in Kenya and she was there to witness it. Do you not think it stange that you have not seen a birth certificate?


27 posted on 06/23/2012 12:29:48 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

“She confirmed him as eligible without any verification.”

There are also two copies of the Colorado “Official Certification of Nomination” document with Obama and Biden named and signed by Pelosi and the DNC secretary. They are both notarized and dated 8/28/08.

The second one has a stamped mark saying it was received 8/29/08. It also has the phrase “the following candidates are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” REMOVED.

I downloaded copies of these from a news article, but I do not have a way post them.


28 posted on 06/23/2012 12:41:26 PM PDT by MikeSteelBe (Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Republican senate and house critters are not much better for allowing this crap to continue, unchallenged. Too many PUBs had a hand in getting Obama elected or did not do enough to prevent it — and I am not just talking about GW, Cheney and McClown. The latter three could have fully identified Obama and his ineligibility but DID NOTHING.

Think "Rubio."

29 posted on 06/23/2012 1:09:12 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Oh, Boehner. Now there’s a tough, principled guy. </sarc>


30 posted on 06/23/2012 1:28:05 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

There they go, “deeming” again.


31 posted on 06/23/2012 1:40:15 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Local CCL class tomorrow 8:00 am

Check this one out !!

32 posted on 06/23/2012 1:49:38 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
If Congress took this issue seriously I do think we would be seeing Nancy Pelosi facing prison time. She confirmed him as eligible without any verification.

Why?
It appears that if just her statement makes it valid, she could confirm her dog as eligible.

The ones who matter and have standing never challenged it.

33 posted on 06/23/2012 2:09:09 PM PDT by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

So, now birthers were right but they are coming out of the closet after the law is changed politically... typical.


34 posted on 06/23/2012 2:12:30 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
“Until you can find a court with the GUTS to rule on this case it’s gonna go no where.”

Today was the deadline given by the Florida judge in the case to remove Obama’s name from the Florida General Election Ballot. Is there any news on this case?
35 posted on 06/25/2012 2:46:45 PM PDT by Yulee (Village of Albion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TBP
[ A person who is not Constitutionally qualified to be President can run for the office, but may not serve. That was established in the lawsuits surrounding Eldridge Cleaver’s nomination as the Peace and Freedom Party Presidential candidate at the age of 31. ]

This looks like a job for:

JOE BIDEN!!!!

So has Biden actually been president these last 3-1/2 years?

That sounds so nice...

So would Joe have to re-sign all those executive orders? Or has he been signing them all along....

36 posted on 06/27/2012 10:54:48 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Lord Monkton is right, A lawyer of a client screwed over by an Obama executive order needs to get case thrown out based of lack of proof of legitimacy.


37 posted on 06/27/2012 10:56:16 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson