Skip to comments.Fast and Furious Noose Tightens Around Justice Department
Posted on 06/29/2012 3:33:52 PM PDT by jazusamo
Explosive reports are now surfacing that Justice Department officials clearly knew about the Fast and Furious gunwalking tactic, in which the federal government actually, a task force comprised of Justice Department agencies and led by ATF, a Justice Department agency allowed upwards of 1400 illegally purchased firearms to be routed to violent Mexican drug gangs. This recklessness led, quite foreseeably, to the murder of at least one federal agent, Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, and probably a second, Homeland Security Agent Jaime Zapata. There are reportedly also scores of victims in Mexico.
The reports, including this one from Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times, explain that this gunwalking information was contained in applications the Justice Department made to the court for wiretapping authorization beginning no later than March 2010 (i.e., over eight months before Agent Terry was killed). Readers of Ordered Liberty will not be surprised to hear this. As I explained in a post last week:
[T]here were wiretaps in the F&F investigation, and when the government seeks a wiretap, federal law requires it to explain what investigative tactics have been used in the case, an explanation that is vetted by top DOJ officials because the government cannot apply for the wiretap without the approval of the attorney general or his designee (a high Justice Department official) it seems highly unlikely, assuming DOJ complied with wiretap law, that top Justice Department officials did not know about the gun-walking tactic until late in the game.
In fact, those who have been following the story here and elsewhere may recall that I started urging the wiretap applications as likely a fruitful source of evidence of the Justice Departments awareness of gunwalking nearly a year ago (see, e.g.,here and here). The required disclosures about investigative techniques are undoubtedly the reason why the Justice Department has stonewalled House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issas demands that the wiretap applications be turned over.
Issa, however, has whistleblower sources inside DOJ. Hes thus been supplied with at least some of the application materials. He has now made some of that public. Though at least some of the documents are sealed, he published some of their contents during the House debate over the vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt. That means he acted under the protection of the Constitutions Speech and Debate Clause, which immunizes members of Congress for statements and acts connected to legislative activity.
The attorney general, of course, has adamantly denied that he and other top Obama DOJ officials were aware of the use of gunwalking in the Fast and Furious operation until weeks after Agent Terrys murder. Indeed, in a letter to the Committee in March 2011 (about three months after Agent Terrys murder), the Justice Department falsely denied that gunwalking had even been used. Holder subsequently retracted that falsehood. Moreover, as the public began to be educated about the federal laws requirements for wiretapping applications, the Justice Department changed its story on that, too. It began claiming that, while it is true the wiretap applications were reviewed by DOJs office of enforcement operations, the Departments top political appointees only perused summaries of the applications which, it was implied, did not allude to gunwalking.
Having worked on and supervised numerous wiretapping investigations in eighteen years as a federal prosecutor in New York, I found these claims implausible. In my experience, the Justice Department reviews wiretap applications from the district U.S. attorneys offices extremely carefully Justice is mortally embarrassed if wiretap evidence gets suppressed due to misstatements, errors, or omissions in applications that the Justice Department headquarters has reviewed. Further, because wiretaps are resource-intensive and thus expensive and burdensome to conduct, they tend to be approved only in very important cases the cases that get a lot of DOJ attention. Finally, Fast & Furious was an OCDETF case: the investigation qualified for extraordinary funding and resources under Justices Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force a coveted designation reserved for the Departments most significant organized crime cases, the cases DOJ tracks most closely. (See here.) It has been inconceivable to me that top DOJ officials would have been unaware of what was happening in Fast and Furious.
In any event, Chairman Issas disclosures, as reported by Mr. Dinan, appear to put the lie to much of what Holder and his minions have been claiming. That includes the bit about summaries; quite apart from the extreme unlikelihood that wiretap application summaries were top officials only source for Fast and Furious information, it appears that even the summaries describe the gunwalking tactic:
The summary of a March 2010 wiretap application shows that federal agents repeatedly lost track of guns they knew were being trafficked back to cartels in Mexico a violation of Justice Department policy that should have raised red flags with top department officials who signed off on the wiretaps, said Mr. Issa, California Republican and chairman of the oversight committee that is looking into the operation. Mr. Issa introduced the summary as part of the Houses debate Thursday before lawmakers held a historic vote to to hold Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in contempt of Congress.
Mr. Issa contends the wiretap application contradicts Mr. Holders claim that nothing in there would have shown gunwalking was going on. The affidavit explicitly describes the most controversial tactic of all: abandoning surveillance of known straw purchasers, resulting in the failure to interdict arms, Mr. Issa said in a letter he placed in the Congressional Record. It appears on pages H4409 through H4411 of Thursdays official chronicle of its debates.
[Yes, that's right: All of these remarkable revelations happened yesterday, but we are just waking up to them now because, as observed here at Ordered Liberty yesterday, Republican leadership chose to go forward with yesterday's historic contempt finding -- the first ever against a sitting cabinet member -- on the day of the Obamacare ruling, when it was sure to get close to zero attention. Nice work, guys.]
Issas revelations, coupled with the contempt holding, will ratchet up the pressure on the Obama administration to quit stonewalling. The committee has been shown only a small fraction of the documents turned over to an internal DOJ inspector general. And, as noted here yesterday, DOJ officials this week after repeatedly insisting they had already given Issa all relevant information offered to show the committee more materials, but only on the absurd conditions that investigators not make copies and not take notes, an offer Issa wisely refused.
Also pressing is the question of why President Obama invoked executive privilege to obstruct the investigation if, as he insists, he had no knowledge of Fast and Furious until after Holder shut it down following Agent Terrys death. It is true, of course, that if new disclosures confirm that the attorney general has been systematically misleading Congress, this will be very damaging to the president who chose Holder and has stood by him during this scandal. But that is nothing compared to the firestorm that would flow from any indications that the White House was clued in to Fast & Furious while the investigation was underway.
Issa talked about this today on Hannity. They are going this route and are asking that the case be expedited so it gets dealt with soon. Obama and Holder are playing rope-a-dope, hoping to get past the election. If Issa can get this expedited, he may be able to force their hand sooner.
I’m very impressed with Trey Gowdy.
SC Freepers—is there any chance that Gowdy will run for Senate against Lindsey Graham in 2014? That’s my dream.
I’ll check it out. Thanks.
Of course Obamacare will cost so much money that we won't be able to afford to have a Nuclear Deterrent, so it's a pointless exercise.
If Obama was President during WWII, the Japanese wouldn't have worried about invading America because we would not have had a gun behind every blade of grass. I'm sure they would have bypassed Chicago. Too dangerous to go in there.
Let’s wait and see what the judge says about Justice handling of the subpoenas. I think we got ‘em there. Holder is scared shitless, that is to say all he can produce is a small poop stain. The best they hope for is dilatory. I think we got ‘em. As that mother-fletcher, ‘Mr. Heimie-town Jesse Jackson said,...”Keep hope alive.” But we must also remember ‘Hope’ is not a strategy. The vice is slowly presseing down on his scrotum and just now putting pressure on his minerals. He does not sleep well. Hell, harrassing the son-of-a-bitch is a reward in itself. But, I think we might have him.
First you invite them to molon labe, then you hakka palle.
I'm all for answering the door screaming hakka palle.
I am a good cook, but I'm not entirely rational when it comes to freedom.
Trey Gowdy is truly on our side. I hope that it’s just a rumor that he’s quitting politics after serving his current term.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.