Skip to comments.Press Secretary Says Contention that Obamacare Is Tax “Idiotic”
Posted on 06/30/2012 12:11:29 AM PDT by John Semmens
Press Secretary Jay Carney sought to get out ahead of the GOP's campaign rhetoric alleging that Obamacare is a huge tax imposed on the middle class.
There's no way this is a tax, Carney insisted. The President doesn't call it a tax. The legislation doesn't say it's a tax. Calling it a tax is idiotic. The President has made it quite clear that the $2,000 a person has to pay for refusing to buy health insurance is a punishment for disobedience, not a tax.
The fact that the Supreme Court decision upholding Obamacare was founded on Chief Justice John Roberts' finding that the so-called penalty is a tax is irrelevant, according to Carney. Roberts' convoluted logic isn't binding on anything, Carney said. All that matters is that the Court voted to sustain the law. Whatever reasons he or any other Justice might give are irrelevant.
To further bolster his case against Obamacare being a tax, Carney cited the waivers granted by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. Secretary Sebelius has no authority to waive taxes, Carney pointed out. She does, however, have the authority to excuse persons from complying with the mandate. Those who think the mandate is oppressive ought to be trying to get on her good side. I don't think that castigating the Affordable Care Act for political advantage is a course likely to achieve that.
Thus far, Sebelius has issued over 1,000 waiversmost of them to organizations and businesses supporting the Administration's political agenda.
In related news, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal (R) suggested that, based on the Court's decision, the government might mandate the consumption of tofu or the purchase of a Chevy Volt under threat of being assessed a penalty for noncompliance. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) dismissed such fears as misplaced. It is the government's job to promote the general welfare. If eating healthier food and driving non-polluting vehicles is deemed the appropriate way of promoting that welfare who is Mr. Jindal to say that the government shouldn't penalize those who won't cooperate?
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news posts you can find them at...
Everybody in this administration is a lying peice of socialist excrement.
Has anyone noticed that o’zeros lips look just like a pigs ass? I only know this because Eric Holder is the love child of billy Clinton’s and J’nut O’renos, and o’zero has been kissing O’holders ASS for a long, long time.
The media will side with them. “It’s NOT a tax” and that will be the mantra.
I beg to differ as excrement has a valid and beneficial use as fertilizer which is good for plants. I would suggest that they are nothing but the foul odor that is left when all the beneficial products of excrement have been used.
Yeah, the SCOTUS was WRONG to call it a tax, but RIGHT to uphold it? That’s a tough pill for even the average 20-something liberal bimbo female to swallow.
Problem is Alito, Kennedy, and Scalia are on their side too. They wrote in the dissent that it’s not a tax.
Socialist/communist, whats the difference?
My name john Semens. I no ken write. So I steal hedlines, real storries end slap my title on it & call it satire. Itz mucho eazier than write my own stuff for humur.
America must declare war against the Obamataxcare.
I cant stomach hearing or looking at any of them
Even Jay Carney is smarter than Chief Justice Moron.
Proving even further that Roberts is delusional. Roberts is a coward and a traitor.
Wow... what arrogance!
Tyranny is coming.
You can take your toys and go home Jay.
Next up, a regency fee for the honor of Obama allowing us to worship him.
I see an image of a dingbat on a stick like they did to Bush.
We’re not worthy.
We’re not worthy.
Truth is, it really matters very little what you call it, because the effects will be the same! What's the over/under on years to the Great American Bankruptcy if this tripe goes through?
There’s no way this is a tax, Carney insisted. The President doesn’t call it a tax. The legislation doesn’t say it’s a tax. Calling it a tax is idiotic.
Carney finally said something true. Only an idiot would call this a tax. Roberts is that idiot. May he soon leave the court.
Problem is Alito, Kennedy, and Scalia are on their side too. They wrote in the dissent that its not a tax.
That’s because they are correct. The only constitutional ruling would have been to call it a mandate and declare it unconstitutional. Calling it a tax is not to our long term advantage and it’s not honest.
If it is not a tax, then is it now unconstitutional?
The extent to which a work of satire goes undetected is at once a tribute to the satirist, and a warning about his subject.
Yesterday Obama called Justice Roberts a Liar,. Now Carney calls him an idiot.
It was Roberts who passd their bill through the Supreme Court by calling it a tax and now they attack him for doing it.
We have 3 branch’s of Government, and we cannot trust any of the three.
Yours is the correct answer.
WTF Roberts did will always be a mystery.
Why he did it will be a mystery.
The whole thing should have been tossed in the trash.
Perhaps he knows something we don’t or perhaps he is crazy as a loon.
John Roberts sure managed to piss everybody off with his idiotic ruling.
Indeed they are.
Alinsky Rule No 5: Ridicule is mans most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.
Ha! The Supremes called it a tax. The Supremes said that is the only way it is legal. The dems are going to rewrite the Supremes’ ruling, then? Hahha, can’t wait to watch this unravel.
Mr. Semmens - you have done your job when 30 out of the 32 people that have responded don’t realize it is satire.
Punishment for disobedience,the King has ruled obey or else.
With this group in DC satire practically writes itself. If most of the readers believe the article at first glance then it is good satire, this is good satire
Did anyone ask why the Obama lawyer argued it was a tax in front of the Supreme Court?
‘”The President has made it quite clear that the $2,000 a person has to pay for refusing to buy health insurance is a punishment for disobedience, not a tax.
YOU BETCHA! “[D]isobedience,” no less. Imperial presidency, indeed. I’d get that into an ad, fast.
I'm not so sure. If the media says it's not a tax, that means the media has to agree with Scalia that it's not a tax. The mainstream media doesn't like to agree with Scalia and Thomas. I think most of the media will agree with Roberts that it is a tax so that they don't have to side with Scalia.
I disagree because the media knows that what is not reported is not so - like Fast And Furious. They do not have to report anything that Scalia said just. I think that could be their approach. We'll have to wait and see but we know their ultimate goal is to protect Obama and if that means siding with Scalia they will. They would side with Ronald Reagan if it meant another 4 years of Obama.
They still think that they are the only source out there for the news. It's an insult to our intelligence.
You could very well be right.
Personally, I think Scalia and the other conservatives are right and that it is a penalty and not a tax. If the media says it’s not a tax, this will be one of the rare times that I agree with the media.
We’ll see. ;-)
My “I disagree” I wanted to change to something a bit more softer but I clicked send too quickly. You made some good points also. We’ll have to wait and see. Like you, I have no trust in the media. There’s no telling what they will do.
That’s NOT a problem. It’s the truth. Only the NAME of the rose has changed.
Good one, John. It helps ease the pain.
In related news, in anticipation of semi-satire-induced insubordination, Chief Justice Roberts left a message with his staff that anyone reading Semmens' column this week will be taxed (or whatever) from their jobs .
Another fine column John!
“Did anyone ask why the Obama lawyer argued it was a tax in front of the Supreme Court?”
Most folks seem to have missed that point. Obama’s lawyer tried it both ways during oral arguments.
John, another great satire, and thanks again for the ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.