Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crony Baloney, Doggy Glitter Edition: USDA’s Market Access Program is Corporate Welfare
Crony Chronicles ^

Posted on 07/02/2012 4:34:59 PM PDT by wewillnotcomply

To view other stories of cronyism, visit here.

Susan Ferrechio at the Washington Examiner writes about the the massive farm bill making its way through congress, and how there are lots of little programs thrown into the bill:

But billions of dollars in the legislation are also dedicated to entities like the Market Access Program, which provides $200 million a year in taxpayer dollars to trade associations to promote U.S. products overseas.

Espree, the company that produces the styling spray for dogs (“Leaves the coat with specks of shiny glitter and aroma of Candy Cane”) was aided by a taxpayer subsidy under MAP.

Paying to advertise for doggy glitter overseas hardly seems to be a legitimate function of government. But it isn’t just small products getting benefits, large and profitable companies are also receiving millions every year to help them pay for advertising. Why are taxpayers paying for this service? Why does the Market Access Program (MAP) even exist? Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, says “The truth is, MAP is classic corporate welfare that takes taxpayer dollars to benefit big businesses’ bottom line.”

A few examples of how the MAP spends its money (amount spent in 2010):

Organization Amount of Funding
Cotton Council International $20,645,807
California Prune Board $3,660,254
National Potato Promotion Board $5,231,810
Sunkist Growers, Inc. $4,072,982
Welch Foods, Inc. $907,177
Wine Institute $7,152,261

We don’t need to pay for companies or industries to market their products overseas. I give this two baloneys:



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: cronycapitalism; cronyism; usda

1 posted on 07/02/2012 4:35:10 PM PDT by wewillnotcomply
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wewillnotcomply

I feel the same way about our “Pure Michigan” ad campaign in Michigan. Taxpayer money going primarily to advertise golf courses, casinos, and high dollar resorts. Meanwhile the primary tourism revenue generators camping, fishing, and hunting type stuff gets barely a mention.

If they want to spend taxpayer dollars they should set up a simple website at minimal cost and let us promote our own state with travel blogs, pictures, stories, etc.


2 posted on 07/02/2012 4:49:14 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson