Skip to comments.Joe Biden Tells Federal Judge He Will Have to Rule on Implanted Microchips (Roberts)
Posted on 07/03/2012 11:52:45 AM PDT by Whenifhow
In the video clip below, Katherine Albrecht, author of the book "Spy Chips" explains how microchips work, and how RFID tracking is used in all kinds of products, and then explains how embedded microchips work in the body. Watch carefully near the end of the clip, when Joe Biden, a Senator at the time asks Justice John Roberts at a Confirmation Hearing: "Can a miniature tag be implanted into a human body to track his every movement? You will rule on that, mark my words, before your tenure is over." This statement by Biden clearly exposes the heart of the Illuminati agenda, which is to insert a microchip into every human being and control them as our ancestors of long ago controlled their slaves. This is absolute proof that the New World Order not only exists, but is entering the final stages of a totally controlled police state where citizens lose all of their rights, even their right to live. This is what George Orwell warned about in "1984" which was written 60 years ago. Big Brother is here and staring us in the face.
joe biden mark my words (RFID)
JOE BIDEN RFID CHIP
joe biden mark my words (RFID)
RFID Chip for all Americans in 2013
ObamaCare Mandates RFID Implants in All Americans by March 23rd 2013!
Lord only knows what happened to Obama's cocaine habit.
Harry Reid obviously has some sort of problem, and then there's Speaer Boehner.
Chips gotta' be a step up from this chemistry stuff.
What can be tracked, can be jammed.
And Pelosi has had so many face lifts, she speaks through the hole in her butt.
What was Robert’s answer?
Being a "made man's" daughter didn't help her anyway ~ those people have no frontal cerebral cortex.
Yup, and Short Bus and Roberts can both jam it. A temporary and uncharacteristic moment of decorum and manners prevents me from saying where.
I said retina scan, the article I posted is about iris scans. Iris scans can be done at a greater distance than retina scans.
Biometrics is exactly what they are after.
The Holy Grail of Population Manipulation and Control, Part I: The Genesis
What was Roberts answer?
Evidently whatever it needed to be to maintain the charade
I have been looking for the answer to that question.
I have listened to 51 minutes of this and haven’t heard the question yet.
Roberts Confirmation Hearing, Day 3 Part 2
Sep 14, 2005
If you have some time, please check here:
Supreme Court Nomination Transcripts - Westlaw’s Collection
Mystery scars on Obama’s head prompt another question from conspiracy theorists - has the President had brain surgery?
Chief Justice John Roberts Has Seizure
Biden Shows evidence of Stroke
Someone messing with their heads?
Heck, just play XBOX with KINECT.
It scans your image, and stores your 'ID'. It also has a wireless capability, which it can use to upload that data to some massive database.
get one of those nice round refrigerator magnets and center the hole over the implanted transponder.
STOP! You're going to make him cry ....
You can block EMF by proofing a hat or clothes with Velostat
Being a “made man’s” daughter didn’t help her anyway 90% of
Hollywood is “made” but once they hit the $gazillion dollar mark we become serfdom to them - village idiots that don’t know how good socialism and communism are good for us.
Better to say: "What can be tracked, can be jacked."
Perhaps the Roberts ruling on obammycare was caused by a malfunctioning chip.
“Evidently whatever it needed to be to maintain the charade”
Funny now how Roberts has lost all credibility. I think life in the U.S. will be forever difficult for him.
“17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”
That little chip will be accepted by many starving people desperate to get their U.N. “food stamp” benefits.
A crisis like a global food shortage will not be wasted by the Anti-Christ.
What was Roberts answer?
Roberts didn’t answer - this was part of a long speech by Biden with no opportunity for Roberts to respond. It is about 1/3 of the way down on the page.
U.S. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HOLDS A HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF JOHN ROBERTS TO BE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT SEPTEMBER 12, 2005
Transcript: Day One of the Roberts Hearings
BIDEN: And we’ll be faced with equally consequential decisions in the 21st century.
Can a microscopic tag be implanted in a person’s body to track his every movement? There’s actual discussion about that.
You will rule on that — mark my words — before your tenure is over.
Can brain scans be used to determine whether a person’s inclined toward criminality or violent behavior?
You will rule on that.
And, Judge, I need to know whether you will be a justice who believes that the constitutional journey must continue to speak to these consequential decisions or that we’ve gone far enough in protecting against government intrusion into our autonomy into the most personal decisions we make.
Judge, that’s why this is a critical moment. There are elected officials in this government, such as Mr. DeLay — a fine, honorable, patriotic man — and others who have been unsuccessful at implementing their agenda in the elected branches. So they have now poured their energy — as the left would, if it were different — and now poured their energies and resources into trying to change the court’s view of the Constitution.
And now they have a once in a lifetime opportunity, the filling of two Supreme Court vacancies, one of which is the chief and the other is for associate justice — the first time in 75 years.
Much easier to do it when they have you look into the box for the eye-test.
Wakestock music festival first in UK to use microchips (electronic wristbands for visitors)
BBC ^ | Monday, 9 July 2012 | By Greg Cochrane
The bands look like standard material festival bands except they’re fitted with an RFID (radio frequency identification) microchip, the same technology as London’s Oyster card public transport swipe cards.
Festival-goers are scanned in and out of areas at the site with either turnstiles or hand-held devices, with organisers able to monitor the data...
Designers claim the advantages to fans are that they can pre-load them with money to pay for food and drink, check into social networks and ensure they have a “cleaner experience”.
The microchips can be cancelled if they’re lost or stolen.
Stuart Galbraith said the main benefit for him was knowing exactly how many people were on site, but admitted that the technology was “fairly expensive” to have installed...
>>What was Roberts answer?--------------
Roberts didnt answer - this was part of a long speech by Biden with no opportunity for Roberts to respond. It is about 1/3 of the way down on the page.
He unjustly levelled against Justice Clarence Thomas during his own Supreme Court nomination:
Senator Biden was the first questioner. Instead of the softball questions hed promised to ask, he threw a beanball straight at my head, quoting from a speech Id given four years earlier at the Pacific Legal Foundation and challenging me to defend what Id said. I find attractive the arguments of scholars such as Stephen Macedo, who defend an activist Supreme Court that would strike down laws restricting property rights. That caught me off guard, and I had no recollection of making so atypical a statement, which shook me up even more. Now, it would seem to me what you were talking about, Senator Biden went on to say, is you find it attractive the fact that they are activists and they would like to strike down existing laws that impact on restricting the use of property rights, because you know, that is what they write about.pp 235-236 of "My Grandfather's Son" by Clarence Thomas
Since I didnt remember making the statement in the first place, I didnt know how to respond to it. All I could say in reply was that it has been some time since I have read Professor Macedo But I dont believe that in my writings I have indicated that we should have an activist Supreme Court. It was, I knew, a weak answer. Fortunately, though, the young lawyers who had helped prepare me for the hearing had loaded all of my speeches into a computer and at the first break in the proceedings they looked this one up. The senator, they found, had wrenched my words out of context. I looked at the text and saw that the passage hed read out loud had been immediately followed by two other sentences: But the libertarian argument overlooks the place of the Supreme Court in a scheme of separation of powers. One does not strengthen self-government and the rule of law by having the non-democratic branch of the government make policy. The point Id been making was the opposite of the one that Senator Biden claimed I had made.
Thanks for your post.
Ran across some articles and other info that showed Biden had some interesting comments at other SCOTUS confirmation hearings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.