Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Plan For World Without Nuclear Weapons—Ours (he must be defeated)
Investors Business Daily ^ | 7-7-2012 | Investors Business Daily

Posted on 07/07/2012 1:51:42 PM PDT by no-llmd

The Obama Record: In pursuit of a world without nuclear weapons, the president finalizes plans to decimate our nuclear deterrent and reduce our warhead count beyond even treaty commitments. (snip) President Obama has decided that indeed we are going to tempt them with weakness. According to an Associated Press report on conversations with current and former administration officials, Obama is finalizing plans, perhaps to be released later this month, to cut the U.S. nuclear arsenal to between 1,000 and 1,100 warheads with the goal "in the longer term, (of) eliminating nuclear weapons."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; bowingtotyrants; caliphate; chicoms; commanderinchief; comradeobama; dhimmitude; flexibility; iran; jihad; kgbputin; medvedev; mensareject; missiledefense; nationaldefense; newworldorder; nuclearweapons; nwo; obama; openmike; putin; religionofpeace; religionofpieces; sovietunioncomeback; surrendermonkey; thejerk; treason; twelvers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last
Let's keep our nuclear defense and send barry packing
1 posted on 07/07/2012 1:51:49 PM PDT by no-llmd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

Meanwhile, Iran can build as many nukes as they want; it’s their “right”, after all. (Oh wait; their claim that their nuke program is for “peaceful” purposes is in earnest, of course.)


2 posted on 07/07/2012 1:55:09 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

John Bolton, former U.N. ambassador and undersecretary of state for international security during the George W. Bush administration, said in an interview that the administration’s plan to cut the nuclear force to as low as 300 “alone is sufficient to vote against Obama in November.”


3 posted on 07/07/2012 1:56:39 PM PDT by no-llmd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd; Lera; chicken head; 444Flyer; MrB; Ezekiel

with the goal “in the longer term, (of) eliminating nuclear weapons.”

Ah, world “peace”

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+8:25&version=KJV

Daniel 8:25

King James Version (KJV)

25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand;
and he shall magnify himself in his heart,
and by peace shall destroy many:
he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes;
but he shall be broken without hand.


4 posted on 07/07/2012 1:58:40 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, 5:13; John 3:17-18, 6:69, 11:25, 14:6, 20:31; Rom10:8-11; 1 Tim 2:5; Titus 3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

And the average 20-something bimbo female says, in response to this: “0bama wants world peas.. I think that’s wonderful!” Problem is, it will get us all killed, or speaking Farsi, Korean or Chinese.


5 posted on 07/07/2012 2:06:15 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd
In pursuit of a world without nuclear weapons, the president finalizes plans to decimate our nuclear deterrent and reduce our warhead count beyond even treaty commitments. (snip) President Obama has decided that indeed we are going to tempt them with weakness.

Why do I suspect that Obama's BFF...

...you know, this guy...

...might somehow have a hand in this objective?

6 posted on 07/07/2012 2:08:31 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd
There is no putting the genie back in the bottle.

Our nuclear arsenal HAS been a deterrent. It was Communists in America who helped the USSR to wage an arms race.

Barack Obama, as Commander in Chief, engages in naked treason to aid foreign powers.

7 posted on 07/07/2012 2:14:48 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Fools.Damn fools.Welcome to the USSA. Socialism is slavery to the State and the Supreme Court did it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128343176

“The nine countries known to have nuclear bombs currently possess about 23,000 of the things.”

300. That would be on submarines deployed around the world, domestic silos, etc.

Of course, Barack has already said he's taken the concept of a US nuclear response to ANY attacks off the table (at least with him as Commander in Chief).

Dereliction of duty.

8 posted on 07/07/2012 2:21:04 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Fools.Damn fools.Welcome to the USSA. Socialism is slavery to the State and the Supreme Court did it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

The new socialist President of France just made it clear that he has no intention of reducing France’s nuclear force. We have Pakistan and India continuing to increase their weapons and delivery systems. Russia continues to get more militant and China..we suspect that the stole some of our weapons secrets..including the neutron bomb and an EMP weapon..which they then perfected via computers.
Yeah..great time to disarm.


9 posted on 07/07/2012 2:24:25 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
Why do I suspect that Obama's BFF...you know, this guy....might somehow have a hand in this objective?

What a foolish suggestion...he was "just some guy in the neighborhood".

10 posted on 07/07/2012 2:28:11 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd
Democrat Obama’s record:Let in 4 million foreign immigrants.
Zero jobs created.5 trillion $ added in debt on every one of us.
Gave amnesty to illegals by decree against the will of Congress.
Sent our jobs, technology and factories to China.
With Obama care took away our freedom to choose doctors and added 13,000 pages of new government regulations to further burden businesses and to take away our freedom.
And yes rank and file democrats actually believe that the people who run the dept of motor vehicles are better suited to give us the cutting edge technologies and treatments to save our lives. democrats love being slaves.
Obama want the UN to take our guns, tax us. Obama wants to take away our nuclear arsenal and missile defense.
Obama has done a million more Crimes against America and freedom that I don't have room to post there.

Heard this monologue on Hannity form a Guest woman host. It was imo the most Amazing monologue I've heard:
http://www.hannity.com/videos/?uri=channels/400391/1681628

11 posted on 07/07/2012 2:40:20 PM PDT by rurgan (Sunset all laws at 4 years.China is destroying U.S. ability to manufacture,makes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

12 posted on 07/07/2012 2:41:05 PM PDT by tomkat (FU barry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

Obama MUST Be Defeated.


13 posted on 07/07/2012 2:41:52 PM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
Has Russia disarmed their doomsday machine (to autolaunch a strike at the West if detonations are detected on Russian soil)?

Inside the Apocalyptic Soviet Doomsday Machine
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/17-10/mf_deadhand?currentPage=all
By Nicholas Thompson 09.21.09

The Soviets Built a Doomsday Machine. It’s Still Working.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/09/the-soviets-built-a-doomsday-machine-its-still-working/
By Nicholas ThompsonEmail Author September 22, 2009

A terrorist could detonate at attack in Russia to spawn a missile volly at the US.

14 posted on 07/07/2012 2:42:22 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Fools.Damn fools.Welcome to the USSA. Socialism is slavery to the State and the Supreme Court did it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

Too much of this “administration” stinks the same stink as that SOB. His life seems to have revolved around an effort to dismantle that which we hold dear.

The Droid known as BARACK seems to be a creation of Ayres financed by the knowns, and unknowns of the Left.

I’ll bet Ayers chuckles himself to sleep every night so satisfied with his cleverness.


15 posted on 07/07/2012 2:42:22 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

In my dreams, SOMEWHERE, is a Republican Party that is willing to NOT rubber-stamp this president’s plan to leave us defenseless.

But it is still a DREAM...


16 posted on 07/07/2012 2:48:51 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

Someone will be along soon enough to tell us how Obama’s nuclear disarmament plan is modeled after something Romney did in Massachusetts.


17 posted on 07/07/2012 2:49:02 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd; All

I hate this traitor,POS, democrat Obama.

I would like to see this POS defeated and humiliated in the November election. and then I will rejoice in the defeat of Obama and the media.

Heard this monologue on Hannity form a Guest woman host. It was imo the most Amazing monologue I’ve heard, a real call to arms:
http://www.hannity.com/videos/?uri=channels/400391/1681628


18 posted on 07/07/2012 2:49:09 PM PDT by rurgan (Sunset all laws at 4 years.China is destroying U.S. ability to manufacture,makes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd; All

I hate this traitor,POS, democrat Obama.

I would like to see this POS defeated and humiliated in the November election. and then I will rejoice in the defeat of Obama and the mainstream liberal media.

Heard this monologue on Hannity from a guest woman host. It was imo the most Amazing monologue I’ve heard, a real call to arms:
http://www.hannity.com/videos/?uri=channels/400391/1681628


19 posted on 07/07/2012 2:51:00 PM PDT by rurgan (Sunset all laws at 4 years.China is destroying U.S. ability to manufacture,makes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
It's an open secret that when Israel and South Africa jointly developed nucs, Argentina was the 3d partner in the deal.

It is assumed Brazil has a few as well.

When the Norks tested theirs, the informed opinion was that Japan could have one in 90 days, if they did everything wrong, 45 if they did it right.

20 posted on 07/07/2012 3:00:50 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

Again, we knew how Obama felt about nuclear weapons BEFORE he was elected. I wish people would stop acting all surprised when Barry does what he said he was gonna do. The people (idiots) who voted for him didn’t care then and they don’t care now.


21 posted on 07/07/2012 3:03:22 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; TigerLikesRooster

Best guess: When the Norks detonated a nuc, did Japan quietly make a few too?


22 posted on 07/07/2012 3:03:46 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

With this and the UN treaty on weapons ownership.. Obama has the gall to push these measures in the second half of an election year.. imagine what he`ll push for in Term #2.


23 posted on 07/07/2012 3:12:23 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

With this and the UN treaty on weapons ownership.. Obama has the gall to push these measures in the second half of an election year.. imagine what he`ll push for in Term #2.

Yeah and don’t forget that Obama passed the Dream act Amnesty by dictate. It bypassed Congress to decree Amnesty for illegals. Imagine what it will do in term 2.


24 posted on 07/07/2012 3:24:03 PM PDT by rurgan (Sunset all laws at 4 years.China is destroying U.S. ability to manufacture,makes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I could live with 300 nuclear weapons if we have a president with the “stones” to use them when/if needed. Super accurate, advanced decoy devices to assist with reentry and defeat any anti-missile systems, combined with a willingness to use them at the slightest attack on any American interest, I could accept this low number.
But since we know there is NO Democrat with he “stones” to use force against anybody except what most of us refer to as patriotic American citizens, then I reckon we need to defeat this worthless oxygen thief and keep our level of nuclear weapons at at higher number; say about 5,000 and use them or other weapons as needed to protect America.


25 posted on 07/07/2012 4:00:39 PM PDT by rustyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the Current Quarter Expenses.


Every time a Freeper or Lurker signs up to be a New Monthly Donor

A generous Freeper donates $10!!

Please sign up now!

26 posted on 07/07/2012 4:32:04 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

This is incorrect. Obama can not affect or control what other countries do. Obama is pursuing a world where the UNITED STATES has no nuclear weapons.


27 posted on 07/07/2012 4:33:53 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

Liberalism rots out the human brain rather quickly.
They’re going to get us all killed.


28 posted on 07/07/2012 4:54:49 PM PDT by lgjhn23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rustyboots; All
I could live with 300 nuclear weapons if we have a president with the “stones” to use them when/if needed. Super accurate, advanced decoy devices to assist with reentry and defeat any anti-missile systems, combined with a willingness to use them at the slightest attack on any American interest, I could accept this low number.

Don't kid yourself my FRiend, 300 nukes in an arsenal might be sufficient for perhaps a nation like Israel, or Japan, or even Britain or France who would most likely NOT be facing a future situation where they would have to engage in a literal global thermonuclear exchange with the only other true superpower (in terms of military hardware), i.e., Russia.

300 nukes would NOT be a sufficient deterrent to the Russians, because they know (as we do as well) that out of those 300 nukes, there have to be allowances made for the following potential conditions, should they be used:

- malfunction of the launch vehicle (if ICBM or SLBM)

- malfunction of the nuclear device itself (which is increasingly likely due to the lack of actual nuke testing of weapons in our inventory, to establish the potency of those warheads in 'active' service)

- interception of an incoming U.S. nuclear weapon by anti-missile defenses of the target nation.

- destruction of any number of those 300 nukes by a surprise attack.

Considering that Russia is in fact our most likely nuclear adversary should hostilities break out, 300 nukes would not even be sufficient to cover all the targets as designated in the SIOP (Single Integrated Operational Plan). On top of that, it has long been U.S. nuclear policy that IN the event of a nuclear war, that a certain percentage of warheads would be held back in reserve for the contingency of a second or even third retaliatory strike on our enemies, this is because you can bet the rent that among the potential targets that Moscow would be aiming at would be our nuclear research, development and production facilities, the Pantex site comes to mind. So whatever we have in inventory is very likely to be all that we have for any nuclear conflict. There won't be time or opportunity to "build more", we'll have to rely on whatever we have available.

You can bet the rent that if any executive shithead in the White House manages to roll back the total number of warheads in our inventory to as low as 300, they might as well just get rid of them all, because those 300 will be all but useless, why?

If you fire every one of those 300 warheads and assuming that every one of them explodes on target, what is our next step when the Russians respond with another 1000 warheads on U.S. soil?

That whole '300 warhead' gambit is nothing but setting us up for national suicide, i.e., Moscow informs us at some future point that if we launch ANY of those 300 warheads, they will respond with 10 for every 1 we launch.

In that scenario, our goose is cooked nuked.
29 posted on 07/07/2012 5:08:09 PM PDT by mkjessup (Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: plain talk; All

I was born in 1967..at that time... during the JOHNSON administration...the US had over 31,000 nuclear warheads—and over 5000 were HIGH—YIELD bombs—some as high as 25MT!! Now, I realize that with modern targeting and guidance systems we do not need all that many high-yield bombs, BUT we should STILL have a “few” say 50 of them or more of at least 5MT—in case some really “serious crap” occurs—where we need to take out whole cities at once—and not just bases. I am SURE the Russkies still have some SS-18’s out there—loaded with the 25MT or larger”region killer” warhead, after all.... I feel we need something as capable as the Titian II—with it’s 9-10MT warhead, with modern technology,and maybe even a MARV RV,—as a “brute force” weapon—and to SHOW that “if you really mess with us we WILL mess BACK!!

I would say-—we should still maintain around 10K warheads—and their delivery vehicles—with at least 2500 of them over 500KT or so—and 100 or so—over 5MT or so...


30 posted on 07/07/2012 5:09:52 PM PDT by Rca2000 ( NEVER underestimate the power of "one little election", in WI.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd
the boy's attempt to destroy the country will escalate in direct proportion to his chances of reelection diminishing so as to do as much damage as possible before he's thrown out on his azz..
31 posted on 07/07/2012 5:14:29 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

This is the proverbial finger in you eye from the spoiled child that is the pResident.

Whiel Iran and the Ruskies arm up...we stand down. That’s just marvelous.


32 posted on 07/07/2012 6:05:44 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
To All Those who support this jerk or who voted for him.....

DOES THIS SCARE YOU YET????

IT DAMN WELL BETTER SCARE YOU...

THIS JERK IS DANGEROUS....

33 posted on 07/07/2012 6:14:44 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

He must be impeached!


34 posted on 07/07/2012 6:16:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

Bolton’s too much of an interventionist for my taste, but at least he believes in the need for a strong defense. Obama gives us the worst of both worlds- an international meddler who does not support the military strength to protect tha nation from the dangers inherent in endless crusades. Nuclear weapons are a deterrent to general war, but history and common sense make no impression on the hyper emotional, illogical leftist mindset.


35 posted on 07/07/2012 6:16:22 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

The guy is a freaking idiot. And traitor. Impeach his ass!!


36 posted on 07/07/2012 6:17:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

If he plans on a nuclear-free world, that must mean that he plans on invading, taking control over, and dismantling the nuclear WMDs in... Russia, China, Pakistan, India, Israel, France, North Korea, Iran...


37 posted on 07/07/2012 6:56:34 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

“Of course, Barack has already said he’s taken the concept of a US nuclear response to ANY attacks off the table (at least with him as Commander in Chief).”

Could you please provide a citation for that? I’d be interested to see it.


38 posted on 07/07/2012 7:12:26 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Pray for America!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

You have some good points. I don’t want to go that low. And while you are right about the “problems” that could occur with just 300 warheads, I guess the main point would be to have a president with the courage to protect this country. I think we might be able to do with a smaller military if others were always afraid we would defend this country. Right now, with this oxygen thief, I don’t think the dog catch in any Iranian town is afraid of him.
Put money into R&D, always update and modernize our nuclear arsenal and it delivery systems, make damn sure the conventional side of our defense is modern, hard hitting and protective of our men. And always; the number 1 ROE, do what you need to do to insure minimum American casualties with maximum enemy casualties. And I really wouldn’t worry about “collateral damage.” Don’t even think about training our new “allies” to defend themselves. Afghanistan has proven what a great program that can be.
It isn’t so much we need 5,000, 10,000, or however many some people may suggest. Have enough to deter, and a willingness to make damn sure they KNOW we will use them.


39 posted on 07/07/2012 7:18:17 PM PDT by rustyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd
We're spending huge sums right now on OHIO Class and D5 missile replacement programs designed to maintain our undersea nuclear deterrence capability through 2080. We won't be firing paint balls.

Some things are wisely institutionalized enough to overcome and outlive four misguided years from a two-bit community organizer.
40 posted on 07/07/2012 8:00:44 PM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
absolutely
41 posted on 07/07/2012 8:04:54 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rustyboots

I agree with your philosophy, although I advocate military superiority which always delivers the ultimate in deterrence. ‘Sufficiency’ is quite frankly a bullshit pipe dream which was promoted by the disarmament crowd back in the late 60’s and 70’s and was proven to be utterly invalid as a strategic concept. American nuclear policy post-World War II was to eliminate the need for a huge standing military (personnel wise) due to our ability to literally decimate our potential future enemies with nuclear weapons.

After the traitorous Rosenbergs sold us out to the Soviets, it became necessary to embrace the concept of massive retaliation and absolute military superiority, as championed by General Curtis E. LeMay (just to name one great patriot).

There is little doubt in my mind that had America been sucker punched by the Soviets during the closing years of the Truman Administration, or the eight years of Eisenhower, JFK’s brief partial term, LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, GHWB, even Clinton, and GWB, America would have responded with everything we had. The two notable exceptions? The buffoon from Georgia Jimmy Carter and the current Kenyan phuckwit stinkin’ up the White House, THOSE two imbeciles exist in a mindset which believes it to be a viable option to NOT retaliate and in fact to surrender, i.e. “they’d rather be red than dead”.

America has kept the global peace since 1945 due to one reason, and one reason only: massive nuclear superiority and the will to use those weapons, and to be sure our enemies both proclaimed and potential, know that we WOULD use them if necessary. As Ronald Reagan stated so clearly on more than one occasion, “America has never ended up in a war because we were too strong” (paraphrased).

Weakness invites foreign adventurism and challenges on a global scale, and what was once the Party of Truman, JFK, LBJ, Hubert Humphrey and Scoop Jackson, has died, replaced by the current DemoCommunists running the show, and their goal IS to weaken America to the point where we are no longer a factor in world affairs, they are all traitors to the core, and deserve the penalty reserved for traitors.


42 posted on 07/07/2012 8:14:19 PM PDT by mkjessup (Romney is to conservatism what Helen Thomas is to a high fashion model walkway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

I mean after all, nuclear deterrence never worked anyway. /s

Here this jackass is trying to get us down to zero nukes, but won’t take a firm stand against Iran getting them.

If Iran gets them, Saudi Arabia and a number of nations in the Middle-East will want them in short order.

Then Hezbollah and other terrorist groups will get the technology and Europe is history.

This ass-hat nine year old must go.


43 posted on 07/07/2012 8:28:51 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Okay, this is treason as far as I am concerned.


44 posted on 07/07/2012 9:11:16 PM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: no-llmd
From "45 Communist Goals", as per "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:
Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35
January 10, 1963:

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

'Goals' 4-45 can be found here:
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm

46 posted on 07/07/2012 9:32:13 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd
Open Mic Catches Obama Asking Medvedev for Space on Missile Defense
March 26, 2012

"In a private conversation about the planned U.S.-led NATO missile defense system in Europe, President Barack Obama asked outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for space on the issue.

This is my last election,” Obama told Medvedev. “After my election I have more flexibility.”

“I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” Medvedev said, referring to incoming President Vladimir Putin."

http://fox8.com/2012/03/26/open-mic-catches-obama-asking-medvedev-for-space-on-missile-defense/
__________________________________________________

Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space.”

Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ...”

Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”

Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”

“This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” That statement tells us much about the president’s mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration. Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president’s comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase “on all these issues,” implying more is at stake than just missile defense.”

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn’t be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/

47 posted on 07/07/2012 9:38:36 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd

Six and a half more months is way too long. The country is in grave danger NOW.


48 posted on 07/07/2012 9:39:05 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Check out "The New Leviathan" by D. Horowitz on Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd
Russia’s military spending soars
February, 2011

Russia has revealed details of its ambitious plan to upgrade its army over the next ten years, planning to spend US$650 billion on the project.

­The unveiled large-scale plans of the Russian defense ministry propose the spending of vast sums of money up to 2020.

First and foremost, Russian defense will focus on the development of strategic nuclear weapons, construction of over 100 military vessels for Russian Navy, including construction of four originally French-made Mistral-class amphibious assault ships, and the introduction into the Air Force of over 1,000 helicopters and 600 military planes, including fifth generation PAK-FA fighter.

Most of the military hardware will be equipped with next-generation weaponry.

http://rt.com/news/military-budget-russia-2020/
______________________________________________________________

China and Russia Launch Military Exercises
April 22nd, 2012 [Lenin's birthday -ETL]

China and Russia launched joint naval exercises Sunday in the Yellow Sea between the east coast of mainland China and the Korean peninsula.

Sixteen Chinese surface vessels and two submarines as well as four Russian warships will take part in the six days of drills. ...

China and Russia have conducted four bilateral and multilateral military exercises since 2005.

http://blogs.voanews.com/breaking-news/2012/04/22/china-and-russia-launch-military-exercises/

49 posted on 07/07/2012 9:40:51 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-llmd
KGB Putin thinks the "COLLAPSE" of the mass-murdering communist Soviet Union was the "greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th Century"

"the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the [20th] century" -Russian leader Vladimir Putin on the collapse of the Soviet Union...
"World democratic opinion has yet to realize the alarming implications of President Vladimir Putin's State of the Union speech on April 25, 2005, in which he said that the collapse of the Soviet Union represented the 'greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century.'
http://www.hooverdigest.org/053/beichman.html
____________________________________________________

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"'The Black Book of Communism,'; a scholarly accounting of communism’s crimes, counts about 94 million murdered by the supposed champions of the common man (20 million for the Soviets alone), and some say that number is too low."

Forgetting the Evils of Communism: The amnesia bites a little deeper
By Jonah Goldberg, August 2008:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmY0MjI1MDgyYjg1M2UwNDMzMTk2Mjk5YTk0ZTdlMWE=
____________________________________________________

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

50 posted on 07/07/2012 9:42:20 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson