Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Poll Proves Mitt May Lose - Coulter Right the First Time?
PolitiJim.com ^ | 7-19-12 | PolitiJim (@politiJim)

Posted on 07/19/2012 1:37:16 PM PDT by rightjb

CoulterVCoulter

Completely ignoring her original CPAC speech claiming that the GOP would loose if Mitt Romney was their nominee, she and others proceeded to make the exact opposite case that ONLY Mitt Romney had a chance in hell of winning in November.  It seems hell is closed for expansion renovations.

A new Economist/YouGov poll shows that twice as many Americans believe that Mitt Romney eliminated many jobs as opposed to creating many.  Wasn’t this supposed to be his big selling point?

Remember, all the reasons the RINO’s, and betraying turncoats like Coulter, gave us to toss aside the most powerful conservative Speaker in our time who could legitimately claim the creation of 12 million jobs while balancing the budget four consecutive times, and beginning entitlement reform?  Let’s take a quick mid-term grade report:

Reason to Nominate Mitt

Grade

He can match Obama in Money

C

He has the best campaign media team

C-

He can attract Independents

B

He is considered a job creator

D-

As mentioned yesterday, since Mitt can’t spend is general election dough and can only use his primary money he is getting hammered in total ad spending.

Conn Carroll writes this morning:

Continued at: New Poll Proves Ann Coulter Was Right the First Time

(Excerpt) Read more at politijim.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012election; anncoulter; chosenloserromney; loserromney; mittromney; rinoromney; romney

1 posted on 07/19/2012 1:37:23 PM PDT by rightjb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightjb
The headline is laughable. "Poll proves Mitt may lose."

How can one use a POLL to PROVE that someone MAY lose?

2 posted on 07/19/2012 1:42:32 PM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb
A new Economist/YouGov poll shows that twice as many Americans believe that Mitt Romney eliminated many jobs as opposed to creating many.

Those respondents think "many" jobs were eliminated because the regime and its "media" direct them to believe it.

3 posted on 07/19/2012 1:42:32 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

This from the same guy who lied in the Quick Summary of Sheriff Arpaio’s
press conference and misspelled his name seven times?

Not a lot of credibility there...


4 posted on 07/19/2012 1:45:11 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks ( 'If you've got a business you didn't build that, somebody else made it happen' 0bama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Ann Coulter supports Romney now because she feels trapped now. It’s sad, really.


5 posted on 07/19/2012 1:45:33 PM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Who was the sample group comprised of? Was it a scientific sample?


6 posted on 07/19/2012 1:45:51 PM PDT by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

The FOREIGNER IS TOAST. Anybody that gets the nomination will slaughter him. There are not enough socialist democrat commies still clinging to this fraud for him to win.


7 posted on 07/19/2012 1:45:56 PM PDT by spawn44 (moo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Romney is ahead FOR THE FIRST TIME in the liberal, Dem +7 CBS/NYT poll. Vis-a-vis 0bama, Romney is sitting in the nearly exact same position he was in before this invented “controversy” came to light.

Romney hasn’t even been nominated yet, nor has he selected a running mate. There are many cards yet to be played.


8 posted on 07/19/2012 1:46:34 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb
As mentioned yesterday ...
This is this the same ignorant blog that referred to "Reverend Jeremiah White" yesterday.
If you're going to be a blog pimp, at least link to one that isn't run by grammar school children.
9 posted on 07/19/2012 1:47:26 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

I say nonsense.

The average person will vote for their team, regardless of whose running. Mitt will votes and so will that narcisstic thief, Obama.

Republicans will hold Mitt to a higher standard than the Dems with Obama. He could have a gay preteen sleep over in the Lincoln bedroom and no one would report it. Or, if they did, they’d say it was a Save the Children from the Republicans or Fill the Tank for Obama Campaign Contributions.

People are burned out on all this back and forth, contradictory nonsense. They’ll vote the party line. And, that could be worrisome. We need to learn to go head to toe with Acorn.


10 posted on 07/19/2012 1:49:48 PM PDT by imemyself
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

The human brain does this. We see a stock we own falling in price and a part of our brains thinks the thing will fall to zero, stay there, hurt us, impoverish us. We see a trend and unconsciously project said trend to infinity.

In my experience, whatever a poll may say today is objectively meaningless with the single exception of polling data on 0bamacare. There, the numbers have been remarkably constant. But I divert from my point.

Polls mean nothing. They are snapshots of bright objects which have the effect of generating buzz. And that’s all they generate.

With the idea of getting Romney’s goat, 0bama, I believe, got Romney’s goat with his Roanoke “you didn’t do that” speech. I’m highly encouraged by Romney’s reaction, and I’m highly encouraged by his refusal to release more tax returns. This is a strategy shift, and it shows subtle but powerful smarts on Romney’s side.

I think Romney latches onto this Roanoke thing and beats 0bama over the head with it; at least I hope he does. The challenge is going to be to connect those random neurons in lib heads that if there is no business, there are no jobs. I hope he can do it verbally via persuasion instead of having the economy collapse and prove it.


11 posted on 07/19/2012 1:50:28 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

The thing that really pisses me off is that some lefty dims in the rust belt where they are too politically correct to make voters prove they are even here legally, can “manufacture” votes for their socialist bastard and get him crowned and I have to suffer!


12 posted on 07/19/2012 1:55:07 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ("Get that evil, foreign, muslim, usurping bastard out of MY White House!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

The GOP-E just had to get their guy into the nomination.

Hope they enjoy their loss in November.


13 posted on 07/19/2012 1:55:10 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (not voting for the lesser of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Romney will win.

IMO


14 posted on 07/19/2012 1:55:19 PM PDT by Justice4awe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Plus I have to read about how the party rejected Newt. That horse left the barn.

And maybe I’m really mistaken but I hardly think the election will be decided by a poll taken in July on whether Romney created jobs at B.

Also, I would be more concerned about being outspent on ads, however, am I wrong that the PACs do not have the same limitations and that referring only to primary versus general election spending by the Romney campaign is misleading?


15 posted on 07/19/2012 1:55:30 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lormand

Coulter was sure right about Judge Roberts.


16 posted on 07/19/2012 2:02:16 PM PDT by MNDude ( Victimhood is the Holy Grail of liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

As long as I don’t see a Utube video of Mitt Romney pulling a “Sanduskey” on a 10 year old boy I will be voting against Obama in November.


17 posted on 07/19/2012 2:04:08 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb
By the time in November King Obama will have bought over half of the voting population. We ARE in trouble and only fools would not think so. We have to get behind Romney and quit this silly foolish trying to take him down. We have a few hard core liberals on FR that want King Obama to win.
18 posted on 07/19/2012 2:05:22 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justice4awe

Your opinion matches mine: I think Romney will win.

Don’t know whose heads are going to explode first; the Liberals or the Romney haters.

I don’t love him...but I will vote for him.

If Obama does win, we have a pretty good idea of who voted against Romney - right on this website.

That’s sad......


19 posted on 07/19/2012 2:09:04 PM PDT by OhioBuckeye ("Here sir, the people govern." - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Romney will win. It will just slow the inevitable march to full-blown socialism, but he will win. So, basically, no matter who wins, they win, we lose. I stopped voting for Republicans because they NEVER do what they say they are going to do. I stopped voting for Democrats because they ALWAYS do what they say they’re going to do.


20 posted on 07/19/2012 2:11:06 PM PDT by huckfillary (qual tyo ta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
As long as I don’t see a Utube video of Mitt Romney pulling a “Sanduskey” on a 10 year old boy I will be voting against Obama in November.

I think you're lying. Even if such a video existed, you'd still consider Romney the lesser of two evils, voting for him over the antichrist, Satan incarnated, and over an open Marxist that you believe will end free elections and haul you off to a prison camp.

21 posted on 07/19/2012 2:12:01 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Nothing to see here, just Ann making a fool of herself again.


22 posted on 07/19/2012 2:14:17 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

Ann Coulter supports Romney now because she feels trapped now. It’s sad, really.

Didn’t she want Christie for President?


23 posted on 07/19/2012 2:16:32 PM PDT by DefeatCorruption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lormand

I didn’t get past the “GOP will LOOSE...” headline. I don’t need badmouthing from a pundit who can’t spell.


24 posted on 07/19/2012 2:16:51 PM PDT by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DefeatCorruption
Didn’t she want Christie for President?

I recall that. She said at the time that she thought Christie could win, but that Romney would lose. Now that she's stuck with Romney, she's got to make the best of it.

She seems to be unable to consider anyone who doesn't have an R next to his name.

25 posted on 07/19/2012 2:23:05 PM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Rush went over most of the latest polls this morning and Romney was ahead or at least even in almost every one of them. On top of that, Coulter has turned into Maureen Dowd in her old age.
26 posted on 07/19/2012 2:49:10 PM PDT by fish hawk (Religion: Man's attempt to gain salvation or the approbation of God by his own works)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

You might have a point


27 posted on 07/19/2012 2:58:37 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Romney will lose because that’s what he’s been hired to do. If he has to, and nothing else works, he’ll resign, like McCain did, before it’s over.


28 posted on 07/19/2012 3:07:13 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb
A lot is being said in the media about Mitt Romney not being "likable" or that he doesn't "relate well" to people. Frankly, I struggled to understand why. So after much research, I have come up with a Top Ten List to explain this "unlikablility."

Top Ten Reasons To Dislike Mitt Romney:

1. Drop-dead, collar-ad handsome with gracious, statesmanlike aura. Looks like every central casting's #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief.

2. Been married to ONE woman his entire life, and has been faithful to her, including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS.

3. No scandals or skeletons in his closet. (How boring is that?)

4. Can't speak in a fake, southern, "black preacher voice" when necessary.

5. Highly intelligent. Graduated cum laude from both Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School...and by the way, his academic records are NOT sealed.

6. Doesn't smoke or drink alcohol, and has never done drugs, not even in the counter-culture age when he went to college. Too square for today's America?

7. Represents an America of "yesterday", where people believed in God, went to Church, didn't screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS!

8. Has a family of five great sons....and none of them have police records or are in drug rehab. But of course, they were raised by a stay-at-home mom, and that "choice" deserves America's scorn.

9. Oh yes.....he's a MORMON. We need to be very afraid of that very strange religion that teaches its members to be clean-living, patriotic, fiscally conservative, charitable, self-reliant, and honest.

10. And one more point.....dumb asses say because of his wealth, he can't relate to ordinary Americans. I guess that's because he made that money HIMSELF.....as opposed to marrying it or inheriting it from Dad. Apparently, he didn't understand that actually working at a job and earning your own money made you unrelatable to Americans.

THE TWO GIANT BRAINS BELOW AGREE WITH ME .... LOOKS LIKE I'M IN GOOD COMPANY....
29 posted on 07/19/2012 3:29:18 PM PDT by jimsin (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson