Skip to comments.The Alinsky-Bernardin-Obama Nexus Part 1 (sickening-Chicago Catholic orgs)
Posted on 07/23/2012 6:45:29 PM PDT by STARWISE
Over at the Blaze, they're running a headline piece on Phyllis Schlafly's new book, "No Higher Power."
Here's the link.
Schlafly has the entire paper trail showing the Archdiocese of Chicago paying for Obama to attend a seminar in California on Alinsky tactics and theory. Praise God, she even has the check stub with "THE CATHOLIC BISHOP OF CHICAGO" emblazoned across the top of the check. The images of that are at the link above.
If you haven't watched my video series below on the Vendee Genocide, please do.
For those of you who have, you will remember that I specifically called out the dead former Cardinal Archbishop of Chicago, Joseph Bernardin, and stated that he was not only a Marxist plant, but also an actual, real-life Satanist, who participated in satanic rituals, "black masses", orgies and child rape.
Guess who the Cardinal Archbishop of Chicago was in 1986 who sent and paid for Obama to attend the conference on Alinsky tactics and theory - the same Alinsky who proudly dedicated his seminal manifesto, "Rules For Radicals" to Lucifer himself?
Joseph Bernardin. Joseph Bernardin, the Marxist plant and satanist, sent Obama to Alinksy training in 1986.
Here is the very short story on what likely happened with Bernardin.
Bernardin was born Catholic in South Carolina in 1928. He had no remarkable zeal for the faith as a youngster, according to his own immediate family. Right after WWII, when the Communists really began their infiltration strategy of both the U.S. and the Catholic Church, Bernardin enrolled in the University of South Carolina pre-med program. All he had ever talked about as a kid was being a doctor.
Bernardin was homosexual, and likely entered into the gay underground scene in Columbia. There he was recruited by satanists. Remember, this is 1948. Satanists and Communists, who many times were BOTH, cultivated and trolled gay bars and the gay underground for recruits. Bernardin was promised power and as much deviant sex as he could ever want if he would enter seminary and be ordained a Catholic priest.
After his first year at USC, Bernardin went home and announced to his SHOCKED family that he was entering seminary. He was ordained in 1952 by Bishop John J. Russell, who was also fingered in depositions as the "celebrant" of satanic rituals.
Russell may have repented, as he offered to testify against Bernardin in a lawsuit brought by one of Bernardin's male seminarian rape victims, but conveniently died before he could testify in the early 1980s.
Bernardin was then speedily elevated up the ranks, being installed a bishop at the remarkably young age of 37. Shockingly, he was made the General Secretary of the Conference of Catholic Bishops (U.S.) in 1968 after being a bishop for only two years, and being only 40 years old. Guess what his job was? Implementing the Novus Ordo Mass, and we can now say with certainty, destroying the Tridentine Mass, and with it the Church itself.
Again, only a few years later in 1974, at the age of 46, Bernardin was elected the President of the Conference of Catholic Bishops (U.S., which is now called the USCCB). He held that post, either himself or through his hand-picked proxies, and pretty much controlled what went on in the U.S., most especially who was elevated to the office of bishop in the U.S. and who ran seminaries, until he died in 1996.
Bernardin, in addition to utterly destroying the Mass, railed against Pope Paul VI's encyclical Humanae Vitae, which explicitly and prophetically condemned all birth control and abortion as objective evil, and laid out the consequences of a contraceptive, abortive culture: skyrocketing adultery, skyrocketing divorce, skyrocketing objectification of women, skyrocketing sodomite perversions, the destruction of the institution of marriage, the destruction of the family as the center of society, economic collapse, and finally total civilizational collapse. Sound familiar???
~ ~ ~
Alinsky-Bernadin-Obama Nexus Part 2
Posted by Ann Barnhardt - July 23, AD 2012 1:18 PM MST
Bernardin's satanic means of coercing Catholics to vote for his Marxist-Communist masters and allies was called the "Seamless Garment" argument.
He told people that it was their duty to vote for pro-abort politicians (read Democrats) because the fact that they wanted to give free s**t to people canceled out the fact that they also wanted to kill babies.
Because, you know, we have to view life as one big seamless garment, and take the good with the bad, or something. If the image of the serpent beguiling Eve in the Garden hasn't popped into your mind yet, now it has.
Since Bernardin was in charge of who got elevated and thus had control over the seminaries, orthodox, heterosexual Catholic men were either rejected or harassed/threatened into leaving.
Bernardin would frequently make "visits" to seminaries all over the U.S. Whenever he would appear, he would ALWAYS have a young male with him, whom everyone knew was his concubine. Bernardin would then cruise the seminarians for sex, and got quite a bit, since the majority of seminarians were homosexual per his policy.
Bernardin was made the Archbishop of Chicago in 1982. In 1986, Bernardin sent Barack Obama to California to attend a training seminar on Alinsky theory, tactics, and "community organizing", which we all know now is Marxist infiltration and agitation of the proletariat with the objective of crushing the middle class, collapsing the economy and government, and thus enabling a Marxist-Communist-Fascist hybrid revolution, ending with the total destruction of the Church and global totalitarian tyranny.
Continue @ LINK.
(FYI ~~ Ann Barnhardt is very outspoken, pulls no punches, has been known to curse when the occasion deserves it, and is a very religious, traditional Catholic.)
"TheBlaze has secured the alleged documents, which the book says were given to the authors by someone who had access to Church archives and are also presented in the appendix of No Higher Power. In the 1980s, a time during which Obama was on staff with Developing Communities Project, an off-shoot of the Calumet Community Religious Conference, the group received support from the CCHD. Below, see a letter on CCRC letterhead that is signed by Obama; in it, he mentions an IAF training in Los Angeles and seeks a reimbursement for his travels:"
Then, a follow-up note shows a memorandum from the Campaign for Human Development (the name given to the group before Catholic was later added in), which confirms a travel payment to the then-community organizer:
And theres more:
~ ~ ~
I'm sickened beyond belief .. my worst nagging suspicions appear to have grounds. Lord have mercy.
Just as there are eeevil, practitioners in every religion it is inevitable there would be some in my Church as well.
But this goes wayyyyyy beyond simply having a high ranking clergy having fallen and committing despicable acts beyond belief; if true and he did in fact enter the Clergy under false pretenses to advance some Marxist/Pederast philosophy/proclivities, then I hope he is well situated in the darkest corners of HELL with all others who have chosen his path.
I know ... the heart breaks and weeps to even think of such things as Bernardin did as possible, and what appears to be this evil alliance between the Church and progressives .. I could just explode with fury and beat someone senseless. I’ve had this awful, lurking suspicion for the longest time ..
It doesn’t surprise me in the least. Also, there were some other rumors about Bernardin that probably wouldn’t surprise anyone here.
I am fully convinced that he was an evil person. Supposedly, he is the character celebrating the Black Mass in “Windswept House.”
All the other bishops consecrated by or associated with Bernardin (who himself was a “boy bishop,” one of the very young ones appointed by the nuncio for Paul VI at that time) spent their very lengthy careers trying to destroy or corrupt the Faith in the United States.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Likewise, I believe we could expect the same reactions from other Christians, Zoroastrianism, Jews, Buddhist, Shintos, etc.
That said, I got to thinking as to what is the difference between me and my Catholicism (which I automatically reacted to condemn these actions) and others, specifically, the practitioners of the "Religion of Pieces" which no matter what dastardly, eeeevil, barbaric, acts fellow members of their "religion" commit in the name of Islam/Sharia, we almost NEVER see anyone disavowing, challenging or condemning what others do.
Telling, very telling!!!
I’ve long suspected Bernardin and his boys of misbehaving — but this blows my mind.
The war between good and evil is apparently being
waged everywhere, even in God’s house, it appears.
The forces of darkness are rising. Terrifying and
insidious. Keep praying. I’m convinced this chaos
and these calamitous time are simply too massive
and overwhelming for mere humans. Only God can
remedy the multitudes of horrendous crises.
Ah yes, Cardinal Bernadin. He of the “Seamless Garment” notion that liberal Catholics use to downplay the Democrat Party’s support for unrestricted abortion.
The "Seamless Garment" transcends the Catholic Church. It is embraced by anyone justifying a vote for an unrighteous candidate.
my stomach is turning. we need to distribute this material near and far. Am linking it to CHicago Crime thread now.
Will this truth get out and be publicized in the rest of the Catholic church? My question (I am not Catholic so I don’t know how it works), how did such an evil marxist get promoted so far, so fast? Did he keep his liberal tendencies hidden from those above him until he was promoted into the place his communist “handlers” wanted him to be? It sounds like he was ‘fast tracked’ to archbishop from the way Anne Barnhardt talks in the article.
It is amazing how Satan has been working on corrupting every branch of the Christian church in America. This book by Gary North describes how progressives infiltrated the Presbyterian seminaries and took over that denomination. They have pretty much done it to every Protestant denomination. http://www.amazon.com/Crossed-Fingers-Liberals-Captured-Presbyterian/dp/0930464745 They started infiltrating the Presbyterian church in the mid 1800s!
This stuff is pure crap and nothing but the crap.
What if it’s not? That Bernardin was an active gay has been well known for a long time. The rest may be debatable but Bernadin’s tenure in the USCCB was a disaster for the Church in the country, a disaster from which we still have not recovered.
It's a sin to bear false witness against your neighbor. You have no evidence whatsoever that would stand up to scrutiny. Does a long time include the time the Pope put him in office? Is the Pope gay too?
If so, may God who knows and sees all forgive me for not being personally knowledgeable of the claims and naively passing on untruths. But in searching further, there certainly is an abundance of sickeningly distasteful and disturbing information, not the least of which implying the protection/covering up/transferring out of offending abusive priests:
Among Bernardin’s close friends was Monsignor Frederick Hopwood who also worked at the Chancery and lived at the rectory of the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist.
Originally ordained as a priest of the Archdiocese of New York in 1951, Hopwood was sent to Charleston by Cardinal Spellman in January 1952. The reason for the transfer is unclear. In November 1954, the same year that Bernardin began to work at the Chancery, Spellman gave permission for Hopwood to be incardinated into the Diocese of Charleston. Bishop Russell made Hopwood his Assistant Chancellor.
By the late 1950s, Msgr. Hopwood had gained a reputation as the Chancery’s resident pederast. Hopwood routinely sexually abused young boys in his room at the Cathedral of St. John as well as Camp St. Mary in Beaufort. Such criminal activities could hardly have escaped the attention of Hopwood’s superior Bishop Russell or his friend Msgr. Bernardin.
Hopwood’s long record of sexual abuse, which involved more than 100 victims, did not come to light until December 1993 when the first lawsuit was filed against the priest.
All of Hopwood’s victims who pressed charges were eventually paid off by the Diocese of Charleston with the financial and legal assistance from Cardinal Bernardin and lawyers hired by the Archdiocese of Chicago from the premier law firm of Mayer, Platt and Brown. The court records of the Hopwood case were sealed as part of the financial settlement with the priest’s victims and their families. As of June 2004, Rev. Msgr. Hopwood was still listed as a priest (retired) of the Diocese of Charleston.
Whether or not Bernardin was an active pederast alongside Hopwood or simply a silent partner while the Hopwood follies were in full swing in the Diocese of Charleston is not known and it is unlikely that Hopwood, who owes his freedom to the late Cardinal, will enlighten us on the subject any time soon.
As Paul Likoudis points out in Amchurch Comes Out, Msgr. Hopwood was not the only active clerical pederast in the Charleston Diocese during the Russell-Bernardin years.
There was Father Justin Goodwin who was ordained in 1953. He reportedly spent a great deal of his spare time at the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist. In June 1995, Goodwin was charged with the sexual abuse of male minors. Diocesan officials had moved Goodwin from parish to parish not only in the Diocese of Charleston, but also to out-of-state parishes in Washington, D. C., New York, and North Carolina before he left the priesthood.
~ ~ ~
Frank Pellegrini was the organist and choir director for All Saints-St. Anthony of Padua Church in Chicago. On May 30, 1984 he was found brutally murdered at his apartment.
His hands were found to be tied with barbed wire, and he had been stabbed more than twenty times. Apparently, there was no sign of a forced entry. The officials from the police department believed that the murder was committed by a homosexual or a woman.23
According to police who were present at the crime scene, shortly after Pellegrinis body was discovered, Cardinal Bernardin arrived at the murdered mans home to quiz the officers about the killing. The cardinal told police that he did not know the murdered man. This raises the obvious question of how he learned of the killing so quickly, and of what special interest Pellegrini was to him since he did not know the victim.
According to information obtained by Pellegrinis girlfriend, Pellegrini had been in a homosexual relationship with a priest from Chicago. He had also been
involved in a secret priestly “boys club” which included occult activities and sexual abuse of young boys from low income ethnic families from Chicago.
Pellegrinis girlfriend explained to the police that
Pellegrini wanted to get out of the club. She went on to
say that he was planning a meeting with Chancery (Chicago
diocesan) officials to talk about this matter shortly
before his murder, but she never knew if he actually had
met with them.24 “
~ ~ ~
Even Pellegrini’s dog was slashed, leaving it seriously wounded but alive.
In the opinion of police detective/profilers working on the case, the brutality and manner of the killing indicated that it was carried out either by a woman or a homosexual, Callaghan stated.
Pellegrini was stabbed 47 times the same number of years he had lived.
Just after Pellegrini’s body was discovered, and while police were still on the scene of the murder, police observed two unusual incidents, Callaghan reported.
The first involved the arrival of then-Cardinal Archbishop of Chicago and one of the most powerful men in the American Catholic Church Joseph Bernardin. Although there was never an indication that Bernardin met Pellegrini, he arrived at the murder scene and quizzed police personnel on the progress of the investigation.
Left unanswered was how Bernardin learned of the killing and why he should personally visit the scene of a relatively unimportant individual whom he had no reason to know.
The second incident involved Pellegrini’s dog. As the police conducted their investigation at the scene, the dog remained quiet, still suffering from its wounds. When the dog saw priests come into the apartment, it suddenly became aggressive and barked wildly.
The Pellegrini murder occurred in 1984 and was “reopened” with federal funds in the early 1990s, but many of the investigation’s informal police notes have been “lost,” and important leads in the case have never been fully followed up, according to Callaghan. The Pellegrini case, at present, remains one of the many hundreds of unsolved Chicago murders.
Although Callaghan never met Pellegrini, nor participated in the original investigation, he and Adema found that whatever secrets the case entailed posed a direct threat to their own lives.
As Callaghan and Adema pressed on with their investigation on behalf of their client, they learned of a warning, which came through contacts in the Chicago Police Department.
Callaghan learned that mob informants had stated that a contract had been offered on his life, and on that of Adema, by an individual closely tied to the Pellegrini case.
~ ~ ~
Lord, protect and cleanse Your church from any and all evil and evildoers. St. Michael, defend us in battle.
Yes, but I believe the “Seamless Garment’ term, as understood in political terms, originated with Bernadin back in the 70s.
Quite the irony how this is applicable to today's presidential race.
It's pure filthy libelous gossip. You're like an old lady. Maybe you're just a transvestite and you can join Brian Ross on ABC and be the Mourning Defamation Club.
"Among Bernardins close friends was...
Maybe you can cover some of Jesus' close friends and prove He was a fag.
"Left unanswered was how Bernardin learned of the killing and why he should personally visit the scene of a relatively unimportant individual whom he had no reason to know."
He was his Music director and the CPD investigators who knew them both called him you idiot. This is nothing, but filthy maggot infested rubbish.
You’re an old lady too. Grab your dress and you can be on the Brian Ross show with STARWISE on the ABC Mourning Defamation Show. Your frist show together can cover how Mother Theresa was a lesbo, because Bernardin wrote a book about her. You’re a disgrace.
God be with you.
The Catholic Church's leadership here in the U.S. is NOT what people think it is.
Gays in the Clergy
Hello everyone and welcome to The Vortex where lies and falsehoods are trapped and exposed. Im Michael Voris coming to you from St. Peters Square at the Vatican.
Its a subject no one really wants to discuss in the open. Every now and then it emerges in an article or book .. but then gets the short shrift as clergymen pass over it as quickly as possible.
The subject? The powerful and influential homosexual sub-culture .. or should we say semi- sub culture.
Here in Rome .. it is no secret .. and if you get in to discussions with the right people who are well informed .. the homosexual mafia is not only a given .. but their power and influence are more far reaching than almost any Catholic in the pew would ever imagine.
These homosexual clergy and their allies have caused tremendous damage to the Church and its about time the issue was talked about plainly and openly.
Weve touched on this topic every now and then .. from the so-called Gay Masses in St. Josephs Parish in Sydneys Newtown neighborhood to the Gay Mass at St. Francis Xavier in the New York Archdiocese to Londons So-Ho District Gay Mass at The church is Our Lady of the Assumption and St Gregory. It doesnt take a masters degree or a Papal diploma to know these abominations are evil.
Can you imagine St. Augustine or St. Thomas or Venerable Archbishop Fulton Sheen giving their blessings to these?
But heres the larger point. These are allowed to happen .. as well as many other things .. because of the pervasive presence of active and passive homosexuals among Catholic clergy .. many of them very high ranking who wield enormous amounts of influence. And here at the Vatican .. the question is being wondered about and whispered about .. how can this network be put out of business? The problem is that it appears to be so widespread and on every level .. that no one is sure how to tackle it.
While there are a few open homosexuals in the clergy .. some of them bishops like Rembert Weakland who ruled the archdiocese of Milwaukee like his own personal gay Club Med from 1977-2002 when he stepped down in disgrace after his former male lover blackmailed him for nearly half a million dollars. Weakland is just the tip of the iceberg however. The homosexual clergy sex abuse crisis which became public ten years ago has brought a number of homosexual clergy .. including bishops .. to the public eye.
Its not the point of this Vortex episode to go back and re-visit each of those cases .. they are notorious and easily discoverable on the internet .. but rest assured .. there are many of them.
The point it to engage in the larger discussion of the power this network of gay priests and bishops wield and how they use that power not only to live a life of sexual immorality .. but to silence those who seek to expose their evil.
Moreover .. they have been complicit in willfully doing all they could to pervert the liturgy .. seminaries .. schools and every other institutional aspect of church life they could. They have viciously sought to destroy the faith by undermining it at every turn.
This has all tied into a much larger broad based agenda on the part of the homosexual movement in general to force society into accepting same-sex attraction and acting on those attractions as normal and even good.
The movement coalesced in the late 1960s .. in what some have called The Evil 60s for a variety of events that that occurred in that turbulent decade.
Militant homosexual activists began to organize socially and politically in the early and mid-70s .. and it was then that they publicly said it was organized religion that would be their greatest obstacle.
So they first began subtle attacks on Protestant groups .. fighting to have homosexual acts viewed as not being sinful. They joined various denominations and became ministers and leaders and advanced the so-called gay-agenda. At the same time .. modernist Catholics were banging the drum for greater hand-holding with Protestant groups and this trend has continued non-stop since. With a bridge to a more open and welcoming style of theology .. Catholic homosexual clergy now had the opportunity to meet each other through already established social and political networks.
And meet they did. Up to this time .. homosexual Catholic priests had remained somewhat isolated from each other except for the occasional meetings. But with networking channels now available to them .. a sea change happened.
The Protestant Clergy Gay Network model was imported into the halls of Catholic clergy and shortly thereafter .. a whole network began developing .. oftentimes under the banner of social justice. One big organization was Call To Action .. which got its start in the Detroit Archdiocese in 1976.
While many consider it the first .. Call To Action would not be the last. Soon more blatant Catholic groups would begin emerging .. like Catholic Coalition for Gay Civil Rights .. Dignity .. New Way Ministry and others .. which openly protest Church teaching and call for change.
Attached to these mostly lay groups were numerous priests and diocesan staffs all across the country .. various priests who in fact would move up the ranks to become heads of seminaries .. monsignors .. and bishops. And what they shared in common was their homosexuality and their desire for the Church to accept their sin as a virtue.
So they spent decades kicking orthodox straight men out of seminaries .. persecuting priests who fought against them .. and insuring that they get as many homosexuals ordained as they possibly could.
As part of the larger plan to overthrow Church teaching .. they have struggled mightily and quite successfully to undermine ALL sexual morality teachings of the Church.
It was many of the loudest voices who opposed Humane Vitae .. Pope Pauls 1968 condemnation of birth control .. and still oppose it .. who have also come out in favor of greater acceptance of homosexuality in general .. civil unions and even same sex marriage.
While this is somewhat of an overview of WENT wrong and how it happened .. the much more pressing concern is this .. how to eradicate this evil from the bosom of the Church. Here in Rome .. which admittedly moves very slowly with everything .. the fruits of the homosexual clergy culture in the Church .. a mass falling away from the faith .. is only now being realized in all its ugliness.
In many ways .. its very secretive .. and no doubt .. in not a few cases .. it is able to threaten to blackmail. But however its done .. there are those in the Vatican who say .. this network must be exposed and ended before any more souls are lost.
GOD Love you,
Im Michael Voris
Please see the area in bold. There is a reason all this is coming out right now. Denial is pointless, and shooting the messenger is not virtuous.
Hello everyone and welcome to The Vortex where lies and falsehoods are trapped and exposed. Im Michael Voris coming to you from St. Peters Square at the Vatican.
Following up on our report yesterday about the influx of gay positive males into the Catholic priesthood and episcopacy over the past 50 years or so .. there is more than ample evidence that this is the case.
For example .. in 1977.. Christian Brother Gabriel Moran was speaking before the annual conference of Christian Brothers and heavily intimated in his speech that religious communities were the ideal setting for homosexual relations. Then there are the widely publicized cases of priests openly challenging Church teaching on homosexuality and receiving absolutely no reprimand or discipline whatsoever.
For example .. The Jesuit Magazine AMERICA in 1978 .. made the incorrect claim .. "the application of Scriptural texts that condemn homosexuality is dubious at best".
Uh, no they are not dubious .. but they played into a gay party line coming from pro-gay Protestant Churchmen who contested that Sodom and Gomorra were not destroyed because of homosexuality and spread the falsehood that it was because they had not been hospitable to their guests.
Not a few Catholic priests were happy to use that line and say it far and wide in CATHOLIC circles and not a few bishops let them get away with it unscathed.
Then there is Dominican Father Donald Goergen who wrote a widely-circulated, pro-homosexual book entitled The Sexual Celibate.
Far from suffering penalties from the Vatican's Congregation for Religious, Goergen was actually REWARDED and elected Provincial of the Chicago Dominican Province, after the book was published.
Some of this is documented in the now out of print book .. The Homosexual Network. It was written by Fr. Enrique Rueda in 1982 who was in shock at what he was seeing all around him in the clergy .. bishops and well as priests.
Speaking of Chicago .. perhaps no single bishop had a greater hand in advancing the homosexual sub-culture in the United States during the past 50 years than Cardinal Joseph Bernardin.
Stories have circulated for years about how gay or gay friendly much of the Chicago clergy was or is .. and that Mundelein Seminary was a virtual training ground for gay clergy .. and it was not alone. One former student for the priesthood was quoted as saying it was not a seminary .. but a feminary .. enjoying a similar reputation as quite a few others .. including Romes North American College.
And with regard to Chicago .. get this. In the mid to late 80s it was becoming apparent even in Rome .. that the homosexual movement within the Catholic clergy in the United States was strong and growing stronger.
One of the centers of that rebellion was a group called Dignity .. a group of dissident Catholics who claims its sole purpose it quote .. "to unite all gay Catholics, to develop leadership, and to be an instrument through which the gay Catholics may be heard by the Church and society." Dignity clearly states that its aim to "promote the cause of the gay Community.
The Vatican eventually ordered the group out of all Catholic parishes .. something that many diocese in the US were very slow to do .. defying Rome and being disobedient.
In Chicago .. Cardinal Bernardin cleverly used an entirely different tactic. He complied with Romes orders. He refused Church recognition to Dignity. However, he created an office called AGLO (Archdiocese Gay and Lesbian Organization), practically identical to Dignity. That office is still operating today and one of its listed resources is Fr. Richard Sparks, a notorious dissenter from Church teaching.
And moreover .. several former Dignity officers ended up as members of AGLO. So what the Cardinal Archbishop of Chicago .. a prince of the Church .. did .. in effect .. was ended up protecting Dignity by giving it a new and apparently "respectable" identity.
It should be noted that Bernardin requested in his will that the Chicago Gay Mens Chorus sing at his wake in Holy Name Cathedral .. which they did in fact do.
And one further note .. Bernardin exercised quite the influence in the naming of a good number of bishops in the US. Many are his protégés and were advanced for that very reason.
The list of these types of accounts could make a dozen books and hundreds of articles .. and as a matter of fact they have. There was even a website called St. Sebastians Angels which was a meeting place for dozens and dozens of homosexual clergy .. including at least one bishop. The site closed down after it was discovered and the bishop was relieved of his duties.
Its is of course horribly sad to talk about of any of this. But the larger point is this. Men like this .. who hide behind collars and under miters are responsible for the destruction of the faith of GOD knows how many people.
And its not just a question of active homosexuals in the clergy .. but those who are sympathetic to their cause because of existing friendships from days in seminary for example.
The homosexual agenda .. which is antithetical to Catholic thought and teaching has been promoted and advanced .. or at the very least .. ignored or given a wink and a nod by many many of the very people sworn and graced to protect the faith.
Is it any wonder that when it comes to clear and express preaching on Catholic sexual teaching .. so much of the clergy is simply silent. Even now .. in the face of Obamas contraception mandate .. the issue has been twisted into one of religious liberty other than what it actually is .. which is an evil and unjust law because it promotes the intrinsically evil practice of contraception.
Could it be that so much of the clergy has fallen absolutely mute on sexual teaching because so much of the clergy disagrees with it and may actually be living a life contrary to it .. including a vast array of secretive homosexuals who are protected by a network of other homosexuals or those sympathetic to them in the hierarchy?
Given how SO MUCH has gone wrong in the Church in this area of sexual morality and still continues unabatedly .. why has there not been even ONE clear definitive statement from any bishops conference clearly stating what has gone wrong and reaffirming in no uncertain terms the Churchs teaching.
It was after all .. a cleanup effort from the Vatican itself in the wake of the homosexual priests sex abuse crisis .. that hopefully began something of a reform. Why was that effort not forthcoming from the US Bishops themselves .. who clearly MUST HAVE KNOWN what was going on and cannot be unaware of the homosexual network in their own ranks and among their own clergy and religious orders.
The sex abuse crisis did not drop out of the sky. It was homosexual in nature. It was homosexual priests preying on teenage boys. It was bishops .. some of whom with questionable associations with homosexual clergy and sympathetic to them who engaged in a massive cover up.
And even today .. it is still many bishops and their staffs that allow the so-called Gay Masses to continue right in their diocese and performed by their clergy. These priests are promoted .. given positions of authority .. sometimes in high Church circles and continue to undermine Church teaching with very alarming regularity.
And they continue to go unpunished .. undisciplined and unexplained. Here in Rome .. clergy will tell you quietly and privately that even they cannot say some of this publically for fear of retribution.
But the truth of this ongoing situation must be exposed.
Good and faithful Orthodox Catholics .. laity and clergy .. cannot continue to run into this buzzsaw of twisted theology and modernist clap trap promoted by a secretive homosexual militancy every time they want to advance the truths of the faith.
The same thing has always been true in the Church .. accept the teaching or leave .. but dont work to undermine the faith for the advancement of your own diabolical and wicked ends.
Years after the miraculous vision of Our Lady at Fatima .. Sr. Lucy one of the three children who the Queen of Heaven appeared to said .. a diabolical disorientation .. her words .. would seize hold in the Church. Could this be what she was referring to?
GOD Love you,
Im Michael Voris
This post might answer some of your questions.
As I see it, there appears to be no mechanism of reform open to the laity.
The only option available to the laity is to rear up righteous sons. Then in 50 years ( maybe) these sons will be in the leadership positions to make reform possible. So?...Does that sound like a rational plan? A half century or more to see any meaningful change and even that is not guaranteed since exiting homosexuals promote and mentor other homosexuals.
Then if the Catholic leaves the corrupt church they are emotionally threatened ( in a cult-like manner) with eternal damnation. Wow! What a Catch 22.
Also, money is fungible, so there is no way to fully guarantee that donations to the Catholic Church are not going to promote more evil.
Michael Voris is one of God’s relentless and committed brave warriors, speaking/writing truth and revealing the false fronts and sickening charades. God bless him. We need his voice today very badly.
Love is not tolerance
BISHOP FULTON J. SHEEN
Christian love bears evil, but it does not tolerate it.
It does penance for the sins of others, but it is not broadminded about sin.
The cry for tolerance never induces it to quench its hatred of the evil philosophies that have entered into contest with the Truth.
It forgives the sinner, and it hates the sin; it is unmerciful to the error in his mind.
The sinner it will always take back into the bosom of the Mystical Body; but his lie will never be taken into the treasury of His Wisdom.
Real love involves real hatred:
whoever has lost the power of moral indignation and the urge to drive the buyers and sellers from the temples has also lost a living, fervent love of Truth.
Charity, then, is not a mild philosophy of “live and let live”; it is not a species of sloppy sentiment.
Charity is the infusion of the Spirit of God, which makes us love the beautiful and hate the morally ugly.
There is NO WHERE else to go. If the Catholic Church is not the Church Christ founded, then NONE are, and Christ was a liar and a deceiver, because He would have failed to keep His promise that the gates of Hell would not prevail against His Church.
"52 The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying: How can this man give us his flesh to eat? 53 Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say unto you: Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you. 54 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in the last day. 55 For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed. 56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, abideth in me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father; so he that eateth me, the same also shall live by me. 58 This is the bread that came down from heaven. Not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead. He that eateth this bread, shall live for ever.
59 These things he said, teaching in the synagogue, in Capharnaum.
60 Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it? 61 But Jesus, knowing in himself, that his disciples murmured at this, said to them: Doth this scandalize you? 62 If then you shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before? 63 It is the spirit that quickeneth: the flesh profiteth nothing. The words that I have spoken to you, are spirit and life. 64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning, who they were that did not believe, and who he was, that would betray him. 65 And he said: Therefore did I say to you, that no man can come to me, unless it be given him by my Father.
66 After this many of his disciples went back; and walked no more with him. 67 Then Jesus said to the twelve: Will you also go away? 68 And Simon Peter answered him: Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. 69 And we have believed and have known, that thou art the Christ, the Son of God.
So...the choice is to support evil or leave and go to hell.
Who said anything about supporting evil? Yes, the Church is infested, but so is everything else in this wicked world. The question is, “What is the Truth?” Was Jesus lying when He said that the gates of Hell shall never prevail against His Church? Notice, He said “prevail,” not “infiltrate.” There is a difference!
When time and money is given to an organization infested with evil, in which the common members have no means to reform it, that is supporting and enabling evil.
From your post it is evident that the evil extends thoroughout the leadership from the lowest rungs of the seminary clear to the Vaticant.
It appears that the only choices open to the lay member is to join with evil or go to hell. Great choice, there.
There is always a way to clean up the Church: PRAYER!! and Fasting and Sacrifice. Just because no one has devised a program to do it, does not mean that Jesus can’t. We who are faithful are being called to suffer, and it is not for us to ask why, any more than we should ask why Jesus had to suffer for us on the Cross.
Rather than being evil Herself, I believe that the Church, the Bride of Christ, has been raped. It can’t be undone, but it can be healed and Christ can heal the Church, just as He heals us. It will take a lot of time and a lot of prayer and a lot of suffering, but in the end, the Bride of Christ will be glorious and spotless once again.
Don't be ridiculous. I'm a faithful Catholic and I do not support evil. In fact, I oppose it with every fiber of my being, and was deeply involved in getting a number of homopederasts removed from my own diocese. For those efforts I was branded an "enemy of the diocese" by the previous bishop. But that's not a big deal in the big scheme of things, and I still believe with every fiber of my being that there is no where else to go.
In South Carolina? In 1948?
Columbia, South Carolina was just crawling with gay Satanist Communists trolling for recruits and determined to infiltrate the Catholic Church in 1948?
Who was the kingpin? Strom Thurmond?
Whatever you've been smoking must be pretty potent.
Search the web for info on the book “Windswept House.”
Amen to post 8, You are not alone, but I am not quite anymore! So something is happening to serve Gods plan I think. I pray! However I do not think we have hit bottom yet. Evil does not like to be called out and when it is it will strike back viciously first then it will lose and fall back.
It says it's a novel that starts with a black mass in Rome in 1963. I guess that was possible in a big city like Rome.
Gay Communist Satanist Underground in Columbia SC in 1948? Not so much.
There IS evidence. Do a little bit more digging.
Voris etal have been at this for quite some time. They have no evidence, only propaganda such as repeated accusations, dubious associations and other pure fabrication buried in mounds of rubbish intended to confuse and disorient. Note that it's not my job to prove a negative. The KISS principle always applies. If there's no evidence, then the accusations and claims are false.
As accusers, Voris et al have the moral duty to provide the evidence for their defamatory business campaign. Voris et al have produced and provided zero evidence. Yes, business. Voris gets paid to defame dead people and cause others to sin. His fruit is filthy rotten from the beginning — pure sin.
Now. "There IS evidence." Produce it! Produce the evidence!
Malachi Martin, the author, said that his book was 85% factual. There is a huge amount of info if you would search. Just because you don’t think it could be true, doesn’t mean it isn’t.
Malachi Martin, the author, said that his book was 85% factual. There is a huge amount of info if you would search. Just because you don’t think it could be true, doesn’t mean it isn’t.
I am not interested in his book, the DaVinci Code, or other piece of wacky fiction. I am only interested in seeing the real, hard evidence backing up the filthy allegations made here on FR and to the world in general made about a faithfully departed Cardinal. Do you have such evidence to present?
" There is a huge amount of info if you would search.
I have no allegations to make against the Cardinal. It's the job of an accuser/prosecutor to provide evidence.
" Just because you dont think it could be true, doesnt mean it isnt.
I am a hard man. Like God, or any other sentient, rational being that values the truth, I require hard evidence, or I don't believe the claim is true, or have faith in the person making the claim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.