I posted this a while ago, don’t remember when, but here it is again:
If someone is an Article II natural-born citizen, it doesn’t matter where he or she was born. It could have been in a hospital, a barn, the back seat of a car, anywhere as long it was to two American citizen parents and here in the U.S.A. The first president to have been born in a hospital was Jimmy Carter. Others before him were home births.
Home birth?
So what?
“Home birth? So what?
_________________________________________
No one is disputing that a home birth is fine, as long as it was in Hawaii.
The dispute is over what country he was born in, and Obama’s obfuscation.
Home birth?
So what?
No witnesses. Could have been anywhere.
“Home birth? So what?”
Home birth is not an issue. However, if the box 6c has a typed entry of “Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital” and the handwritten code next to it is the code that indicates a home birth, then there is a discrepancy that points to tampering with the original document.
Somebody changed what was typed in that box, and didn’t know the significance of the handwritten notation and that it would result in a contradiction.
So what?
No other president had gone around claiming he was born in a foreign country as did Obama for so many years before he started running for president. Had he not done that, no one would have thought much about a home birth in Hawaii, but since he had been leading everyone to believe that he was FROM Kenya, he was no longer entitled to the benefit of the doubt.
If you go around lying about being born in a foreign country, when it comes time that you want to prove you were born in the U.S., you D@mn well need to come up with unequivocal proof. He has not done this.