Skip to comments.Eric Hovde Needs a History Lesson in “Grand Compromises”
Posted on 08/08/2012 10:42:44 AM PDT by 92nina
When Eric Hovde claims that he pledges to support reducing tax rates, he is really hoping that voters ignore prior statements where he has promised otherwise. Hovde has told Wisconsin voters that he would accept a tax hike deal with Democrats as part of a grand compromise.
According to Politifact, Hovde has told voters that he would accept a budget-balancing deal that gets $10 in spending cuts for every $1 in new revenue.
Hovdes admission leaves voters wondering if he understands the basic premise of a budget compromise. Perhaps Eric Hovde is not aware that budget compromises between Republicans and Democrats do not work. He should examine the 1982 and 1990 budget compromises.
In 1982, President Reagan was promised three dollars in spending cuts for every one dollar in tax increases. Whether Hovde remembers this or not, Congressional Democrats never delivered on their promise to cut spending.
In 1990, President George H. W. Bush was promised two dollars in spending cuts for ever one dollar in tax increases. He fell for the bait and violated his Pledge to not raise taxes. After a $137 billion tax hike, spending actually rose by $22 billion. If the 2011 debt-ceiling deal taught us anything it is that when Republicans hold the line on taxes, spending cuts occur. John Boehner understood this and it is a shame that Eric Hovde does not.
Eric Hovdes willingness to negotiate with Democrats like Harry Reid on tax hike compromises further proves that he is not the conservative leader he claims to be, said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. If thirty years of so-called compromises have taught American taxpayers anything it is that at the end of the day, they are stuck paying more taxes with no realized spending cuts. It is a shame Eric Hovde is leaving tax hikes on the table.
Read more: http://atr.org/eric-hovde-needs-history-lesson-grand-a7115#ixzz22yfeupfz
Take the offer- but the spending cuts come first this time....
(Actually if they just did the $10 in spending cuts they would not NEED the tax hikes.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.