Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jjotto
Opposing an ethanol mandate is one thing, trashing people for trying to thrive by the rules our elected representatives established is quite another.

I must disagree. Those who claim to value small government and capitalism, but disavow themselves of said principles for every illicit opportunity tossed to them as an incentive for re-election by their representatives are scum. Just because they claim, "But I'm just playing by the rules," doesn't change anything, it is why we are where we are today in terms of creeping socialism and encroaching big government. And yes, I feel the same way about all government subsidies and tax deductions designed to encourage immoral or irresponsible behavior. In this case it is both immoral and irresponislbe; immoral because it gives an unfair advantage to an industry that could not exist under ordinary market conditions, raising the cost of food for the masses at the expense of a few greedy farmers and processors. Irresponsible because of the effects on food prices and the damage done to our small engines, and other unintended consequences not thought through.

14 posted on 08/17/2012 6:59:30 AM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: LambSlave

Actually, I agree with your arguments exactly and apply them to Mitt Romney, where FReepers line up to “disavow themselves of said principles”.

Except you’ll have a tough time convincing anyone that tax deductions for business expenses are immoral.


15 posted on 08/17/2012 10:13:04 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson